Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Yes, he should... (Score 1) 338

"The Obama administration should not have attempted to misuse its instruments of state to stop criticism of its ruling party candidate."

When foreign entities hack the email of a U.S. political party and then tries to influence U.S. elections with that information, you better believe the PotUS should step in and stop it.

Comment Re:US Post Office always secure. (Score 1) 454

Nope, it's not "way more susceptible". As Paul Gronke said, election fraud is rare. It's generally isolated to smaller community elections where a few hundred votes can sway the outcome. But even then it's hard to hide, just like the case in West Virginia that was cited. Trying this same technique on the state or national level and get away with it would be a herculean effort. Also, simple practices would make vote-by-mail far more safe than it is now. Oregon seems to be doing just fine with it. They haven't collapsed into a pit of corruption.

Comment Re:US Post Office always secure. (Score 1) 454

I'm wagering that you only read the headline of the first link in your Google search. The article actually makes an argument for the pros and cons of vote-by-mail. You concerns are kind of silly because they aren't any different than someone picking up the local paper and voting exactly how they "recommend" you vote. Vote-by-mail has been going on for decades and there is no evidence that the system is fatally flawed. Voting will never be 100% secured.

Slashdot Top Deals

Somebody's terminal is dropping bits. I found a pile of them over in the corner.