How would you benefit if the economic powerhouse of the USA were destroyed? Vlad, is that you?

Taxpayers gave ATT literally hundreds of billions of dollars to build out last mile high speed internet. Actually, this goes back so far that SBC and even Pacific Bell were receiving this money here in California. Pacific Bell once promised all subscribers would be able to get ADSL by the year 2000!

ATT (and others, but ATT is the single largest beneficiary) handed this money out to shareholders and executives instead of delivering that access. These phone lines they are trying to shut down now are among those which they promised to deliver high speed internet access to, then never did.

If ATT were a person, we'd have thrown it in prison for decades.

The solution to the ATT problems here in California is the same as the solution to the PGE problem: Nationalization. Both corporations are frauds right on their faces; they take the money they're handed, but they don't meet any of their obligations. There is literally no way in which they are doing what they say they are doing. Why is fraud bad for me, but great for AT&T?

Yeah, but no shrimp or mixed fiber fabrics.

Congress controls government spending and finances. I indirectly vote via my elected representatives.

Blue Origin is far, far from having "caught up". They've had three launches, with a 33% mission failure rate. They are now where SpaceX was fifteen years ago, but with a much worse record (Falcon 9s first mission failure was launch 19, though it did have a partial failure on launch 4 -- primary payload successful, secondary payload failed). New Glenn has done better on booster recovery, but they weren't the ones learning how to do it.

And even if SpaceX never manages to make Starship fully-reusable, they can always punt, build a lighter, fully expendable second stage and have a launch platform that blows every other heavy lift vehicle in the world away.

The Chinese are moving pretty fast but they're also a generation behind.

Maybe, but the problem is that the electronics have to run at those temperatures and not have solder joints start popping, or other fun failures.

As far as I know, it is just real-time. And it didn't even slow down at the flashing red light. So either it recognized that someone was waving it on or it didn't see the flashing light at all.

I *think* that number actually is counting them, though it's hard to be certain. I'm pretty sure servers are outnumbered by PCs by a large margin.

Most of the energy consumption is now moved to the customers bill, so there's nothing saved. Just redistributed.

And to think they made Jimmy Carter sell his peanut farm.

Actually it's LAW. The buyer has the legal right to engage their own independent agent who represents their interests.

I got wifi 7 for twenty bucks. well, TBF I paid maybe $24 with antennas.

The argument is over the MRED desire to list internally on their *private* network of local agents (and via Compass listings) before making it public on Zillow.

MRED want to give their member agents a chance to sell the property first, before opening it up to the general public via Zillow. Compass lists properties publicly -but with a paywall ("like what you see? pay us to get the full details!")

Zillow wants to have the same (day 1 full info) access as the MRED (and Compass) members -or else Zillow won't carry the listing at all.

There's apparently lots of bribe money to go around.

Cameras and LIDAR. I am not a self-driving car engineer, but from what I understand, it seems likely that it is possible to detect water with even just cameras, at least under the right circumstances, and with cameras plus LIDAR under a lot more circumstances. But doing so would require proper training data; it's not like there's a "Ooh, that's water" recognizer built into the hardware or whatever.

More to the point, they would have to train it how to recognize that some particular sensor return pattern (e.g. zero LIDAR reflections off the ground) is a problem, and do so in a way that doesn't over-correct for flooded potholes, an inch of water in the street, etc. Presumably, detecting water is the easy part; detecting the depth of water is the hard part unless you know exactly how high the curbs are.

I'm a little spooked when I see Tesla FSD beta demos where the car plows right on ahead through slightly flooded streets as though there's nothing there. It makes me wonder whether it saw it and ignored it or just didn't see it. It's the same feeling I got this morning when someone was signaling me to go ahead at a flashing red light and FSD beta (12.6.4) went right on ahead. I wonder if it somehow saw the hand gestures, or if it just didn't see the flashing red light at all.

That's what makes all this stuff fun.