Because the coders never designed the table to match commercially available parts.

If he uses off the shelf parts, the table won't look right and the physics will be different.

My first thought was 'why doesn't he just use parts available on the market?'

But if what you create doesn't look and feel like Space Cadet.... the effort feels like a waste of time.

There is damage inherent in humanity. Catholics call it original sin but even if you're not a believer, I think it's pretty apparent.

People are damaged which means it'll never happen that we all agree to uphold a moral standard. Should we do better? Of course we should. But reality is reality.

Where being a believer helps is in the fact that there is something good about all of this. If it gets bad enough, people start to reevaluate priorities and suddenly, more will stand behind that moral standard and things change for a time.

It's a painful process but it's also an opportunity. What can I say, my faith tasks me with beeing a bloody optimist. It's hard work ;).

Well, you've just proven that you don't know what the term means if you think Europe is ultra-fascist. You can try to pre-empt disagreement all you want, if you're being a dumb-dumb, people will call you a dumb-dumb.

There are fascist tendencies. That I could agree on.

They're giving GREAT tools into the hands of good people...

Until they're in the hands of not so good people.

People are not careful enough in these regards.

Yes and he is absolutely correct on the matter.

So what you're saying is if we tell Elon, he'll want to build a station orbiting the sun where they just hold the wavers with a mask against the sun and wait for the magic to happen.

Now THAT would be fun to watch!

I haven't seen using no AI being a requirement in the job offers talked about here.

IF that is part of the job then indeed using AI to create your resume is a pretty stupid idea.

However, if it's not a requirement then I'd say I don't understand the article... Everything starts sounding tye same? Good! Filter those out. Find the ones you are unsure whether AI was used. Follow up on those.

Responsible use of AI is like using your friend's class notes to learn. Irresponsible use is like handing in a copy of your big brother's same assignment from two years ago. The former is always to be commended!

I see nothing positive in your behavior.

"...because voters aren't all that bringt..." Whoa there, Mao Zedong...

RAIDZ with 30TB drives... you, sir, are a much more courageous man than I.

If you can exclude the poverty you pretty much can sugarcoat every civilization ever.

If you exclude the sacrifices, life was pretty good under Aztec rule.

If you exclude the Holocaust...

If you exclude Gulags....

You get my drift?

For anyone interestet, GPT5.2 scored 1462, so we're talking a 10 percent increase in score.

Seriously.

144 elo points better than ChatGPT? Okay. So how many does ChatGPT get? 112? 1345? 13634? 98123?

Giving this number would elevate the summary from useless to useful.

More crap, faster. That's what the world needs.