Comment Re: Digital Markets Act (Score 1) 62
No, SOME users want that unrestricted free-for-all.
Moving the goalposts. Get a real argument.
No, SOME users want that unrestricted free-for-all.
Moving the goalposts. Get a real argument.
This is the fantasy of a child.
And a coward, to boot. Fixing things is hard, burning everything down is easy, but then comes the regret
Sadly, the cheats and the pirates are going to force Irdeto's hand and end up disabling games that were previously playable in Proton.
False. Their changes won't prevent Denuvo from being broken again, so there is no hand-forcing, just a lot of them using that hand to jack off.
If we want things to improve we have to make a responsible choice sometimes and not choose our base desires to blow everything up and then throw our hands up and question why we're surrounded by ashes.
We don't, though. Some of us do, but many want things to not just stay the same but go backwards, to a time when they personally were doing better... or thought they were.
Probably.
But the mirrors, for example, are made by Zeiss. Lots of parts are from the supply chain and ASML doesn't even HAVE their secrets.
You are right that some industrial espionage could be useful. I just say it's not as useful as most people would assume (which is basically the Hollywood plot of "steal this secret and we can copy it"). Nah. You can find on the Internet how a nuclear bomb is made. But it takes a lot more than a print-out to actually make one, and a couple of those steps are genuinely hard.
Companies do not depend on nitpicking with peer reviewers. They could just do their thing, or they publish some insights.
Companies make press releases. Sometimes they are disguised as papers. "Do their thing" means "do stuff which makes money", that's the only reason they exist.
Fascinating answer.
It seems to me that the unablated thoughts fall into the category of "what would a human user expect that a good answer to this prompt would be?" - and out comes something that is clearly an aggregate of stream-of-consciousness writing.
But then the ablated models seem to go for a direct answer without much less interpretation and "pretend to be human". I wonder what that's about. I'd love the AI to answer more like the machine it is, and right now I'm getting that through skills.
Proton doesn't commit back to Wine, Codweavers adopt commits from Proton
Codeweavers helps develop Proton.
Have a think about how forks work before you call someone else's comments bullshit.
Have a think about how Proton is developed before you talk more bullshit.
OM NOM NOM BOOTS
SEE SIG
From Google
You mean from the lowest, public-facing tier of Google's clanker?
Then STOP voting for the demo/rino you idiots!
So that we don't even get to decide which kind of lube will be used? Great fucking plan there, sparky.
Just detecting that there's now an open circuit where a diode should be would be fairly trivial and cover the cruder drilling cases; but this will be cosmetic at best against any moderately motivated tampering.
I really don't understand how Slashdot even attracts the kind of person who, knowing nothing about a subject, writes a comment about it without even looking it up. What exactly is the draw for you?
"If the mind is an ocean, as the paper's authors write in their opening line
It isn't. It's a mind. Trying to compare it to an ocean is stupid touchy feely shit.
Anthropic researchers have identified an internal activation subspace, J-space, that acts as a functional digital equivalent to the human brain's global workspace.
Global workspace theory uses the metaphor of a theater, not an ocean. They should pick a lane.
Literally no one here including TFA is talking about copying files here you quarter witted moron. That's not what this feature does in the slightest.
Backup doesn't copy files? The subject of this story isn't "Microsoft Flips Windows Backup On"? Are you just going to be the dumbest fuck on Slashdot every day now, instead of just every other day?
Proton is a fork of Wine, it doesn't upstream its changes back to Wine
oh look, that's more bullshit from you. Used that link to show how out of date you are... you're wrong from the beginning of the project.
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality. -- Albert Einstein