I don't know why, but it looks like a cool background for a movie or series into credits.

Wow. a news for nerds story that is actually pretty damn cool. Even a summary that is interesting.

A one year series for calculus, physics, or chemistry, that's just the basics, nothing deep.
Most other core classes generally have one class on a topic. Maybe there is an advanced elective. How is that a deep dive?

By "deep dive" I am thinking at least a master's level where you spend a few quarters (or more) researching something. Or the master's version of the class picks up where the undergrad core and elective advanced left off. So you have to take that advanced elective if you did not have it as an undergrad.

Sure an undergrad class can be hard, or it can be a lab class that takes a lot of time, but that's not what I considered "deep". Getting a bachelors is really just basic proficiency in some field, qualified for more advanced studies or likely to be productive in the work force. Either of which will involve much more learning.

...then Alexa will make your vacuum cleaner trip you on the stairs

Maybe don't point it at the sticky notes on your screen or the bottom of your keyboard

To be honest, listening to Bank of America when they tell you to install their phone app and connect it to your accounts is really not the smartest thing to do either. A phone app should only see credit cards where you will not be held liable for false charges you report. Never an ATM card attacked to check or savings, or checking and savings themselves. And when only doing such credit cards you should really be using something like Apple or Google Wallet where there is some additional protection and an indirect connection to your bank, making the bank's own app unnecessary, and one less point of attack.

So change the coding interview to match what they will do on the job. If they aren't going to turn a requirement described in natural language into code that implements and tests that requirement, the test them on their ability to review a code implementation and the set of corresponding tests. The latter can provide some of the struggle they need to learn. And how well their code review goes can help distinguish between those that know more from those that know less. Those that actually debigged agentic code and those that just trust agentic code.

Nobody should be working for any government, givernment jobs should be stigmatized, people working for government should be stigmatized, gobernments shouldn't have employees. People working for governments should be scared that other normal people will find out.

Finally, good advice from too-big-to-fail banks. ;-)

Nope. Business school is a graduate school. These people have both a Bachelors degree, 60% is a STEM field, plus some real world job experience.

Degree plus work experience is what is meant by "a background".

Nope. Not at the bachelor's level. The deep dive is for graduate school, MBA programs excluded (they are surveys of all the major fields of large organizations).

Nope. In business school getting separated into groups is for the permanent team assignments. With 5-6 person teams there is usually barely enough accounting background folks for one on each team. You see business school is very team oriented. Besides team projects a person with expertise in a given area is supposed to tutor teammates that are having problems with the material. So this distribution of backgrounds across the teams, at least one each of accounting, management, and STEM creates are broad enough set of capabilities for tutoring within the team.

Nope. The word "allegedly" means there is no evidence. Thank you for proving my point.

Hack the EPA cuz I'd prefer the pollution regulators to be more occupied with being doxxed than with keeping an eye on my waste disposal practices...

Hack the IRS cuz I don't want my creative accounting to rise above the noise floor of all these new weird charges on the auditors' own credit cards...

Or hack the FBI cuz I *really* want to rob that bank across state lines *and* get away with it...

Would my friend (and not me) be a
-common criminal
-budding mafioso
-terrorist

Asking for a friend.

Same thing was done with lead. Along with a healthy put down of the chemical warfare specialists (the only government scientists studying it at the time) who said it was a bad idea with the argument that if it was that bad, they would have used it during the Great War.

Didn't Colossus demand that Dr Forbin be placed under video surveillance as well?