They patched it rapidly only to have a very similar vulnerability affecting the very same components drop like a day later.

Arguably the patching effort lacked real analysis, that should have been triggered, and got pushed out with the first obvious fix applied. On the other hand leaving users with only the option to implement a workaround that disables ipsec while a full fix is investigated, is also a problem...

I am not criticizing anyone here, disclosure vs time to patch, and regression avoidance in complex software systems is a difficult problem. While it speaks to things like code quality and security priority, I don't think when it comes to large software projects you can really charaterize either of those things with a methodolgy that amounts SELECT COUNT(*) FROM cve WHERE project = ....

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/...

Citadel CEO. I have seen work that would normally be done by people with a masters or PhD in finance over the course of weeks or months, being done by AI in hours or days.

I have no other words to characterize idiocy like "A 5000 year old country doesnt forget its roots or what a brutal dictatorship they were ruled over by the Shah for 26 years" so yea if the shoe fits wear it. I provided objective reasons to support my characterizations of your remarks. You on the other hand have nothing substantive to say and can't support your positions. You are just wasting everyone's time.

Unfortunately? What part of unreasonable search and seizure is hard to understand? You know how the Founding Fathers fixed what is accurately called an oversight? They’re called Amendments.

And we have plenty that should be preventing this abuse. Even written while the Founding Fathers were still around to declare “oh crap, we thou fucked up.”

If you need to use the term “loophole” to describe your job, then the only “job” you’re doing is marketing the bullshit required to call that anything but criminal.

Your statements were factually incorrect. What is your issue with the NYT article? Are there any facts in it that you dispute? If so which ones? Do you dispute Mossadegh held a sham referendum that got 99.96% of the vote to give himself powers he was not constitutionally entitled?

There is no definition of coup that includes someone with the constitutional right to do something legally doing that thing. This would be like saying had Nixon not resigned and was impeached and the removal vote succeeded he was ousted in a "coup". That isn't a thing and makes no sense. The king always had the power to remove Mossadegh and he exercised it on Aug 15th 1953. This is an indisputable fact. A coup is when a member of the state exceeds their authority to gain power they are not legally entitled. Nothing like that happened.

As for the CIAs involvement it is way overblown. There was real popular support for the king and this at is how he won the legitimacy contest with Mossadegh who was convicted and jailed for three years for his illegal coup attempt. The CIA absolutely had plans and tried to help the king but their role was minimal. The real power came from a coalition of Iranian supporters who won the day.

It's Nancy Pelosi. But if you won't go after her and her family, then I doubt you're serious about going after the real problem "investors" here. I bet they're going after the rich, connected assholes' competition.

So, what's the point here? To produce a 21st century version of the James Bond plate flipper?

https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=46.37.685

Personally, I prefer mud. It's a small traffic infraction by comparison.

Your ignorance is beyond words. The Iranian regimes raison d'etre is literally "exporting the revolution". It has wreaked havoc thought the region for decades doing exactly that. The fact Iran is the worlds leading state sponsor of terror is not merely an empty slogan.

The regime has the blood of the entire region on its hands in addition to oppressing and massacring its own people while severely lacking any internal legitimacy. I hope they get wiped out.

The Iranians are Trumps and BiBis biggest fans.

If you can't beat em might as well join em. Everyone should just create a network of spy cameras /w opencv or something and let anyone browse the database. That should piss off enough people to end this madness.

Translation: A Federal agency purposely fucking bound by Constitutional limits within the Bill of Rights, is now so openly corrupt that they are brazenly requesting to spend taxpayer money in order to buy that which they are not allowed to legally capture.

You want new toys to do your job? Start remembering the fucking law first, children.

We the People, need to end the data broker loophole.

"For all who draw the sword will die by the sword."

This wasnt a lawsuit for control. It was a lawsuit to force profits back to the nonprofit

B..b..but this is ${prior_art} using the Internet!

Don't forget closing down everything, (except Walmart, liquor stores, head shops, massage parlors), stay home from work etc and of course, MAIL IN BALLOTS for elections. Covid 2.0

Does what I want and keeps everything UNCLUTTERED.