Every single person can easily tell the difference with higher refresh rates above 200hz and even higher when provided a fast moving image. It is imperceptible if the objects on screen on not moving - at the limit imagine non-moving picture you don't need more than 1 frame per second for that.

Theyâ(TM)ve diluted the word Copilot so much it means absolutely nothing. Copilot+ PCs exists also, not related to these. Literally nothing they produce actually fits the Copilot name or acts at a copilot. In fact if California is during Tesla for using the name Autopilot for a feature that literally replicates Autopilot as it works in planes, then this should be a slam dunk to sue on every single one of their various platforms named Copilot.

NPR is basically a democrat mouthpiece I donâ(TM)t know why people are trying to lie on this, do they want to pretend they are not bias?

You mean the quality of the answers? I stopped after around 10 questions I asked went unanswered except for some snarky replies that usually ignored the heart of the question.

Reddit felt like a fair place where the top upvotes content was displayed, then Trump won in 2016. At that point the CEO decided to ban every single subreddit that was at all conservative leaning. You went from a basically even split of political posts making the top posts, to 100% democrat. The CEO even changed every comment from âoefuck spezâ (the CEO) to âoefuck Trumpâ site wide. Then even replaced mod teams at other non political subreddits if they did not ban conservative content. Itâ(TM)s a shame that it now still has the farce of feeling democratic, when in reality it has every political disagreement banned if you donâ(TM)t represent a US democrat view.

You deserve more upvotes as you are totally correct. People that are unvaccinated have been unvaccinated for YEARS and yet somehow they want to blame Trump because "DRUMP BAD." This is like when they claimed he was to blame for egg prices in his first week in office. Hopefully people wake up to the blind Trump hating that is clearly misplaced in many cases.

Why would you ever think a law from 2003 has anything to do with the current administrator and the uptick now? Trump was a Democrat back in 2003.

This is incorrect as almost any modern mouse already uses over 1000 hz polling rate and will 'draw' at the same rate as the monitor's refresh rate. People only struggle to notice the difference at higher refresh rates if they are using it for a game that doesn't actually require a high refresh rate because there are not fast moving objects. If you test purely fast moving objects by themselves nearly 100% of people will be able to tell the difference with a higher refresh rate monitor.

Returns are diminishing as frame rates get higher but it will still be noticeably smoother when objects are traveling very fast across the screen. Just drag your mouse around your screen quickly with a white background and you can see how many missing frames there are, and how much additional frames you would need to make the mouse actually smoothly connect while dragging it quickly. Even with a current 300 hz monitor you will see the gaps between your mouse for the missing frame with a quick swipe of the mouse. For gaming such as in a shooter you often aim using your mouse which changes the entire screen's pixels extremely quickly so having missing frames filled in helps significantly with aim and reaction time.

I really liked the hobbit at a higher FPS also, but I can see how some people were put off by certain scenes that somehow felt lower quality due to the higher frame rate.

The whole human eye only perceives X fps is complete and utter nonsense that somehow keeps getting perpetuated. To make 24 fps in a film look like motion there is constant trade off such as making individual frames blurry to substitute motion. People can easily pick out 1000 fps/hz if the motion is moving fast enough across the screen.

There is no question they are subject to local laws, but they go far beyond their local jurisdiction and determine their fines based on global revenue. The more comparable analogy is if China made revenue of 1 / 100th of their business in America and America decided 100% of the business has to follow American law and 100% of that business get used for fines. It's completely unfair.

This seems like free advertisement for Netflix's game section which I've never seen anyone actually use.

The problem is the EU makes everything illegal and also subjective. Not to mention they literally threatened Elon Musk with unrelated fines unless he cooperated on censoring on X. Then the EU followed through with the threat and made fines for very subjective sketchy things that have zero truth to them. Specifically what they asked him to do was ban accounts on their behalf and keep silent that the EU was who ordered X to ban accounts. Upon refusal, not less than a year later we have these fines for quiet literally spreading 'misinformation.'

Wrong, American's hate the regulations EU puts on internet companies. We hate cookies and we hate being FORCED to use USB-C. If we wanted it we would have voted for it or politicians that implemented it.