All ages should not be using AI to complete work but all ages should be using AI to learn and ask questions. It's the closest thing you can get to having a 1/1 student teacher ratio on a subject. AI is also extremely broad, this ban feels similar to saying we need to prohibit internet. Obviously you should not be using the internet to complete tests but there are cases where it makes a lot of sense. But hey even a US high school degree is basically a participation trophy at this point so who are we to judge Norway.

Imagine the government confiscating $7T. You can only do that 1 or 2 times before all the trillion dollar companies are gone and you are left with everyone else.

That is still happening. They just moved the parts of USAID that were kept into other departments.

Every single thing they got rid of is listed on doge.gov. They did not get rid of any programs that showed any evidence they were actually used. The bar for 'being used' was a single response to an email.

It was Anthropic's CEO and executives themselves that were claiming how dangerous and powerful the model could be. Anthropic said it was so powerful they had to release a version with safety measures to prevent it from being used for evil prompts. The administration is simply responding to their own claims, and this is even a greater risk now that those safety measures are apparently able to be avoided using prompt engineering.

You've been lied to. That never happened. You are a victim of left wing propaganda - when you get old you'll realize that politics is about lying about your opponent.

The Cybertruck was selling for $60K not long ago, plus a government rebate for $7,500. Inflation is about 30% since 2019 to now making that same truck $52K. Semis are on the road and selling. FSD is works amazingly right now - Robotaxi's haven't had an at fault accident since February. I don't know if you are living under a rock or what. Obviously these are late but revolutionary things don't need to be on time to be successful, its not like another company completed any of those items in the same time frame.

It sounds like you have a strange aversion to him. Why are you so insecure about people think he's a genius?

Musk delivers on the promises he makes, even if late, and he has a clear cut goals that sound crazy to most people but turn out to be amazing decisions. For example with Tesla if you look at his 'master plan' from 20 years ago it is exactly what the company did step by step. The fundamental value of the companies based on only their income still makes Musk worth hundreds of billions, just not the outrageous valuations given based on future expectations. Thinking he is not a genius is actually insane or a coping mechanism for not agreeing with him on politics.

SpaceX is worth more than Microsoft or Amazon at this point. It boggles the mind how much people are betting on the future just because Musk is a genius. If he gets sick the stocks craters 80% easily and this $60B is more like $12B.

Musk didn't sell a single share in the IPO. In those transactions yes there is a buyer and seller, but that is only exchanging one zero sum item (cash) for a non-zero sum item (a company). The world is a big ball of materials, there is quite literally too much of everything to ever be used by the human population, it just takes efficient work to extract them and put together in a way people desire them. For all intents and purposes there is infinite resources except some are difficult to access, barring certain very rare elements only found in certain locations (that we know of). Imagine you and your neighbor each have a field and he plants popular crops using farming techniques and rotates them to regenerate the soil, while you plant the same high value crop each year. After a few years neighbor 1 is making$1M/year and neighbor 2 goes bankrupt because they did it wrong with the exact same materials. That's what capitalism encourages and why with capitalism there is always winners and losers but the pie also grows - because neighbor 1 likely takes over neighbor 2's land and now both pieces of land are producing $1M a year.

Based on the article its impossible to discern whether the outlawed broadcasts are only those where you are involved in the situation, such as creating or enabling it, or whether this would also outlaw things like live news coverage or live streaming of events people stumble upon while walking down the road.

A disclaimer would make it not deceptive though, so how does that work? Is the idea that the disclaimer needs to be on top?

PlayStation at least has amazing exclusive titles and decent VR. Switch at least is portable and has bigger screen than a phone, and exclusive titles. I couldn't tell you what reason there is to own an Xbox, although I've seen exclusive titles it's never been a big draw. I'm surprised Activision Blizzard has been doing well - I guess many games are timeless but as an old gamer they've all been played to death with new content that feels like could have been included in an update.

There is no way this can be good for their business, physical cards everywhere gets eyes on their product and makes it easier to buy. There must be something they are doing wrong with their gift cards if scammers are hurting them or their customers that badly while other companies are still using gift cards.