If endless scrolling is what people want and they should have the right to have it. Kids are debatable because on one hand the parents should be controlling what their kids have access to but on the other hand what they have access to should be very clearly outlined by these companies. You can't claim to have a 13 year old mode for kids content and then show adult content like sexual videos or self harm.

Insider trading is already banned on these platforms and stocks actually have far more upside for insider trading than prediction markets.

Insider trading is already explicitly banned from these platforms and they actively go after those that do.

"I am expert in X with a degree from Y and I've found that ...." some user literally did this every single post and farmed massive karma in every subreddit on every single topic. Reddit information is about as useful as asking random people off the street.

holy shit, have you lost your mind?

Now instead of hitting your token limit in 10 minutes, hit them in 20 minutes!

A job is not needed for the sake of having a job. If you can use AI and robotics to replace labor and still produce the same amount of food, mine, or produce any product with minimal human interaction then it would be stupid not to do it.

That is like saying "we need to stop using shovels because digging with spoons would keep more jobs." The increasing in output is what matters not the act of working.

It's not really that dangerous though. Their threat of Mythos turned out to be bunk. It was just a marketing plow because they don't have the capacity to roll it out. Have you tried Claude? You get timed out constantly if you do anything remotely useful.

This would put on the brakes on full force to AI. Imagine creating a model and now you have a 5 year wait time for a review for your model to get released. It's a disaster in a world where new models are coming out every month or more often. It's unfortunate David Sacks time at the Trump administration is over or this wouldn't be a conversation.

Black hats are a danger no matter what, it doesn't matter what tool you give them. They were saying the same thing about GPT 2. It's all just to hype it up, most security risks these days end up being human.

Claude wanted to give the impression it was "so good that its going to break internet security." But now with GPT 5.5 you get a comparable full model released with zero problems.

You could probably buy every rail company in the US in full for that cost. This price tag is absolutely insane.

You grow some vegetables in your garden and sell it for $100. Apparently you now fucked over the person who bought the vegetables?? Hey that guy now has $100, let me take 5% of it because now I don't!!!!! This is how you sound. I bet you instead would rather have no one growing anything at all because your so mad that someone would create something and make money.

He was the CEO of Paypal even if he didn't found it. He did actually joined Tesla before there was even a prototype - before that there was just a name. The Tesla roadster was designed based on the Lotus Elise body type not a previous Tesla. OpenAI/ChatGPT was founded primarily using his money and his recruiting - he should own that as well without a conversion from non-profit to for profit some how. Do you honestly think these companies all just handed him 25% or 40% ownership? No. No one would give that ownership away if they held value before that. The companies did it because he was both founding them, funding them, and also leading the companies - even acting their engineer is most cases. I can't even imagine mental gymnastics to assume that Elon was gifted anything he created.