If you believe ANY software can be made 100% secure, YOU should be fired for total incompetence. You find vendors with a proven track record, do thorough risk assessments, patch discovered vulnerabilities, and cross your fingers.
Sounds relevant. If they find a bug, is it like an ant that for every one you see, there's a hundred you don't? By patching the instant a patch is released, you've patched that hole. But security is whack-a-mole, next bug pops up soon (by your own admissions). Vulnerabilities everywhere, in every software from every vendor. Kind of seems like the issue is keeping the system online despite it being an insecure idea. Back in the days of the Apollo program, programs were well audited to make sure no bugs existed. They didn't have a "we'll fix it in an update" attitude like Microsoft and everyone else today. Turning everyone into beta testers. Might work for johnny gamer, but for US nuclear missiles, why are they connected to anything? Please tell us there's a air gap somewhere, that our nuclear missiles aren't part of the IoT.
Or are you implying that ANY use of Microsoft products is gross negligence?
Are you new here?
everyone had to make their own website
Not true. https://i.postimg.cc/RFZqZv3w/...
Even if you look just at
What a load of bs. Go back to articles in the late 90s and early 00s on this very site, then scroll down to the comments. They're no different than today. Well, maybe the addition of AI slop rants. And the CIA spooks took a liking to this site at some point, so they're probably here running their games screwing with people and politics. https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/...
All constants are variables.