Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:so much for (Score 1) 43

The EU and other democracies are actually doing something about that with actual consumer protection laws. Americans need to get over the idea that what the US does is the best and everyone else's system is inferior.

FWIW, I agree with you. Unfortunately, we don't tend to elect people that will actually implement any sort of protection for the consumer.

Comment Re:Half of the country voted for this (Score 2) 43

Your analysis assumes that people who didn't vote would not have voted for Trump if they had voted. Trump doesn't have the support of half the nation now, with his approval rating in the dumpster, but I'm not convinced that was the case during the election.

My assumption is closer to accurate than the assumption that non-voters were supporting Trump. If they were supporting him, they could have voted for him. Most of the non-voters I've actually interacted with couldn't stand the idea of voting for either candidate. The assumption that a non-vote was a vote for Trump is just that, an assumption. And a bad one at that.

Comment Re:so much for (Score 2) 43

By the PEOPLE for the PEOPLE...is that not how democracies work ? Seems to me in the USA "the people" are now just a resource to be exploited by the wealthy. What is it that the USA excels ib being able to lie to its population with all sorts of hidden fees etc, where as in the rest of the 1st world it is illegal to do so, the ticket price is the price you pay. Surely being truthfully informed so you can make an informed choice is one of the great freedoms.

Freedom is for the monied classes. We are currently watching those monied classes instruct the government in removing rights from the non-monied classes a little at a time to see how far they can push that line before people snap. I have doubts that they don't have a plan in place to crack down on those they view as their lessers when that line finally gets crossed.

Comment Re:Half of the country voted for this (Score 1) 43

And they will find some excuse to justify it. Reminds me of sheep lining up at slaughter house.

It's been reported that just north of 65% of the population even participated in the vote during the 2024 election. Trump received just under 49% of the votes. 49% of 65% translates to roughly 32%. That's not half of the country.

There's a lot of sadness in all those statistics, but it's not the sadness of "half of the country supported / supports Donald Trump."

Comment Those divisions? (Score 1) 43

XBox? Cool. Everybody knows XBox as a brand is in flux, with a high likelihood of a large scale pull-back or having it altogether fold.

Sales? I've said this in other threads over the years, but when a company starts firing sales at any scale that's recognizable beyond "release low performers," there's something bad brewing in that business. The business world views sales as profit generation, providers, the most important, the best of the best. When sales starts getting slashed, the business is suffering, or preparing to suffer, a large amount of shrinkage of market share, or the decision makers are preparing to watch the market shift drastically in a way they aren't quite ready to address yet. Because if they were ready to address it, they would be retraining sales on the new market dynamic, and not slashing them.

This signals Microsoft is seeing some really dark times ahead. I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn1 feel all that sad about that.

Comment Re:LOL! (Score 2) 113

"Such a deal would help improve the industry's relations with the Trump administration and could help garner political support by sharing wealth generated by the AI boom with the public"

LOL! You sweet, naive child.

Yeah, the truth is by tying it to the government and promising to give money to the public, they'd be setting themselves up for some of that sweet, sweet "To Big To Fail" cash when the bubble begins to burst and the levee begins to break. That "giving money to the public" would quickly turn into "public must support us, or we can't support them," which would just as quickly become, "permanent government supplied subsidy for existing."

These sick fuckers won't be satisfied with draining our 401ks. They want *ALL* the money. Including that which the government uses to keep the military industrial complex lubricated.

I wonder what happens when we run out of game tokens for them to steal?

Comment So long, Cloudflare. We won't miss you. (Score 1) 33

The AI companies have decided that they are the arbiters, the owners, the collectors, and the disseminators, of all human knowledge. If it exists, they have a right to it. And *NO ONE* is allowed to stand in the way of that.

Something tells me Cloudflare is not going to be strong enough to stand up to the tremendous amount of clout these tech companies have managed to garner through pure hype-cycle bullshittery in the past few years. Which means it's time for a new web security company to spring up with the backing of the AI companies.

I look forward to watching the war between Clownfail and the AI Masters. I'm sure it won't cause a further erosion of trust in technology. LOL.

Comment Re:TACO Tuesday? (Score 1) 68

Indeed. No idea why he still tries getting richer at his age though. He basically threw away his whole live on an obsession of being something he is not. I would not care much, except for the massive, massive damage, the rape, war-crimes, scamming, climate-change-denying, etc. is doing to everybody else.

He's a mash-up of two things:

1. The last gasp of the actual Boomer generation, holding onto their hatred and trying desperately to prove, one last time, that they were the only generation that ever actually mattered.

2. The worship of the rich and rich wanna-bes that the Boomer generation still worship as if they were actual gods simply because they managed to gather more game tokens than others.

Donald spent most of his life wishing he was as wealthy as he projected. He's got a legitimate shot at making himself that rich now, and he's doing everything he can to reach that goal before he finally checks out. I wonder if he's a believer in the afterlife having a cover charge, or if he somehow believes leaving enough wealth for his family will save him from whatever terrible fate he was scared of when he started babbling about fearing not making it into heaven? Either way, he's definitely of the belief that more wealth makes a better person, and he's scrambling to set himself up to reach a little higher on that ladder before he's done.

He doesn't care at all about the consequences for the rest of us.

Slashdot Top Deals

Don't be irreplaceable, if you can't be replaced, you can't be promoted.

Working...