"environmental remediation costs": la Presidenta is working on those, with no environmental rules, those costs as he sees them will go down. The environmental costs will go up as well as the costs they inflict on the rest of the economy.
"Wiles and Rubio are smart people," with no moral or ethical compasses.
True Threats have a legal standard and specificity of person, place, and time are elements.
Criminal Threatening usually has a state statute.
The summary sounds much more like "muh feels" and conclusory pleading so it's probably not true to the legal standard.
How many arrests were made?
Also getting arrested for a social media post is a special kind of stupid on all sides
Posts are almost always powerless and can just get you in trouble. Don't do it to blow off steam. Or for clout.
Not worth it, get out there and take action if you mean it. Don't blab about illegal fantasies.
like a bounty-seeker scorned.
Shoulda just paid 'em.
He sounds quite knowledgeable and it looks like he'll continue whipping Defender until morale improves.
It's worth noting that the black market would pay handsomely for most of his discoveries but retribution is sweeter than cash.
I get the sentiment.
History will remember today's leaders of industry saying things like:
Nobody could have saw that we were heading into an unprecedented economic disaster.
No joke. The way you can't even drag windows when Office apps are busy is hilarious coming from a composited X11 desktop, where not only can I drag busy applications, the mipmapped thumbnails update.
The term Corporatocracy shows up in some left-wing essays going back at least to the 1990's that I'm aware of. It's one of those terms that gets thrown around like "kleptocracy" that is more of a pejorative than a serious classification.
Whether those were actual attempts on his life is a matter of debate
I think 90% of people read it that way. And it wasn't even obvious in the comment thread because so many people took it the way you and I did. Absolute trash article thanks to the botched headline that seems to immediately conflict with the first sentence of the article.
Runs great, but macos updates has broken dual-boot on more than one occasion. Boot loader and closed hardware are the weakest links of using Linux on a Mac as a daily driver. It can be done, but Framework laptop is my preference for Linux if non-AI workloads are desired. Easier to install, easier to fix, and easier to upgrade. And 10 years from now it will still be working and worth a damn.
Great. That's some definition of "run"
I prefer bare metal for what I do. Plus I have had my fill of wrestling with macOS's weirdness around keyboard layouts, when I can fix it on Linux with a simple text file change.
Bitch about MS all you want, they took security problems very seriously after XP and fixed almost all of it.
Is that why we were discussing one of their allegedly patched vulns still not being patched years later... like two weeks ago? They take stock prices seriously, security not so much.
It's fundamentally impossible for an operating system to protect you from the manufacturer of that operating system. That trust is unavoidable.
Apple made their OS open, then closed portions of it, so you cannot trust them, just like all of the other closed source vendors. That doesn't mean no operating system is trustworthy, only that Apple is no more trustworthy than Microsoft.
Criminals is the excuse, an AI Surveillance Police State is the point.
Everything in the rule is sensible for a dictator.
Well, and FWIW, there has been a huge increase in the number of
"security fixes" Debian has been downloading recently. I assume the same is true of other Linux distros and probably for Apple, though I don't think those are made public. Perhaps the BSDs haven't seen a large uptick.
Only God can make random selections.
