Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Trump has expanded the high skill work visas (Score 1) 92

In most countries, if you hop the border and get caught, you wind up in jail and then get deported.

In most countries (at least western ones) the processes and policies are the same as the USA. Just because you hopped over the boarder doesn't mean you're there illegally. Asylum seeking isn't illegal, it's a defined legal process and not crossing at a registered point of entry doesn't invalidate that process. Likewise elsewhere if you're caught somewhere illegally you are deported. If you were being processed through the immigration system your status was "legal" until such a time as the process concludes. This is the same as USA and elsewhere.

What is unique to the USA is that they are arbitrarily shortcutting the process and declaring people "illegal" without due process. That process is unique in the USA right now. I agree with you though, you guys should copy what other countries do, but copy normal western countries, not authoritative shitholes.

Comment Re:Trump has expanded the high skill work visas (Score 1) 92

Can anyone name a dozen or so competent Democrats that could be expected to the POTUS, VPOTUS, or in the Cabinet in 10 or 20 years?

I can't even name a competent republican to be POTUS today.

One thing is clear: Competence has nothing to do with it. It's a popularity contest and there's no consequence for being really bad at your job. Forget about locally, the USA has had its reputation utterly devastated globally and everyone seems to agree is currently run by an absolute moron. They just put on a smiling face to him, while they actively distance themselves from America behind the president's back.

Comment Re:I use Brave (Score 1) 136

No worries, if you wanted other examples I've seen them in news sites, in reddit, twitter example. Adblockers will block the "sponsored" posts as well, these can't be blocked on a hosts level since they seem to come from the same server serving you the content you actually want.

But literally every little bit helps. Even with hosts based adblocking you're already a mile ahead of the normal internet which is just miserable to use.

Comment Re:Your messages today will be read tomorrow (Score 1) 22

Given the rate of "progress" with QC doing prime factorization of arbitrary compound numbers, not only will I be dead by then, everyone who will have known me in my life will be dead. And if you add the criterion that QC must be cheap enough to make it worthwhile to crack my secret messages, there's a fair chance that everyone who would have known anyone who knew me in life in life will also be dead by then.

And no, I do not believe in doomsday prophesies.

Comment Re:Creating FUD (Score 1) 70

DOA returns don't work that way. As a vendor, Nintendo has two choices: refund the money and pay for return shipping back to Nintendo or refund the money and let Amazon scrap the product

Nintendo can refuse the DOA as fraudulent after identifying serial numbers. These are working units which are not refundable, even if the customer caused a problem with them.

There is nothing that would require Nintendo to compensate the retailer for accepting a return from the customer which does not qualify under the manufacturer's warranty. Goods are working at the time of sale, and the customer commits a Terms of Service violation causing their unit to be restricted. There is no defect in the unit, and any return as such is a fraud no different than a customer accidentally dropping their unit and attempting to claim warranty.

Actually, there's a huge difference. It's called the "reasonable person test". In law, that means that if a reasonable person would not expect a hardware purchase to suddenly get massively reduced in functionality for buying a used game, then Nintendo generally speaking will be hard pressed to prove that their terms of service (being a contract of adhesion) are not unconscionable. In the absence of such determination, Nintendo disabling the device at least arguably has no legitimate basis in the law, and could be considered fraudulent.

Add to that the presumption that Nintendo has incentive to make used copies of games scary for consumers because they will make more money selling directly to the consumers, and this starts to rapidly fall into the "attempt to monopolize" section of the Sherman Act, which makes the behavior legally actionable federally.

I could go on, but it suffices to say that this is highly questionable on Nintendo's part from a legal perspective, and is a really great way to get their company nailed to the wall on multiple federal charges.

That said, none of the questionable legality of their behavior, their terms of service, or their warranty policy negates the fact that Amazon's vendor contracts determine whether or not Nintendo has to take the return, not any agreement between the customer and Nintendo.

I have a colleague who ordered a thousand dollar CPU and other parts, then when the shipment came from Amazon it was just an empty CPU package. Someone opened the manufacturer's package, removed the actual CPU, and shipped them an empty package that had the number of the part they ordered on it. Amazon absolutely refused to help them. That would be the first time they needed a return with Amazon. Amazon would not take the return or make it good for them in any way whatsoever.

That's where you go to your credit card company and issue a chargeback. Amazon really doesn't have a choice in the matter unless you give them one. As someone who has used this process successfully, it is absolutely better than getting screwed by a sleazy vendor.

I understand your view that playing with copied games doesn't fit the criteria, but Nintendo obviously disagrees.

Nintendo's perspective is moot. What matters is whether a contract of adhesion is so draconian that it would be held unconscionable by the courts. I would argue that it almost certainly would be held unconscionable under those circumstances or anything remotely similar to those circumstances.

Nintendo does not even give room to argue against them on this, however. The Warranty terms on their product specifically cite "Unreasonable" use as a condition that will disqualify the unit from warranty coverage and specifically includes "usage with game copier devices".

THIS WARRANTY SHALL NOT APPLY TO DAMAGES TO THE PRODUCT CAUSED BY PARTS OR REPAIRS THAT ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH OR AUTHORIZED BY NINTENDO (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADAPTERS, SOFTWARE, AND POWER SUPPLIES).

And again, you're still talking about warranties. None of that matters. The return policy is dictated by a standard Amazon vendor contract, not by whatever pile of legal vomit Nintendo wants to put down on paper.

That said, installing a game presumptively manufactured by Nintendo or one of its licensees does not, at least to a reasonable person standard, meet the criteria you're mentioning here, which means installing a game that to the best of your knowledge is a legitimate copy of the game resulting in Nintendo choosing to brick your online access is fraud, and absolutely is grounds for warranty service, were you not returning the product through the original retail channel, which makes the warranty moot.

WARRANTY SHALL NOT APPLY IF THIS PRODUCT (a) IS USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES (INCLUDING RENTAL); (b) IS DAMAGED BY ANY UNAUTHORIZED MODIFICATIONS OR TAMPERING; (c) IS DAMAGED BY NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT, UNREASONABLE USE, OR BY OTHER CAUSES UNRELATED TO DEFECTIVE MATERIALS OR WORKMANSHIP (INCLUDING USE WITH GAME ENHANCEMENT AND COPIER DEVICES)

Nor does installing a game appear to meet the criteria here. The user did not use any game enhancement or copier device. The possibility that someone else may have sold a game that was so copied is moot. Nintendo still doesn't have any legal right to brick the device, even under a strict reading of those warranty terms.

And the fact that Nintendo has to do something to make the Switch 2 not work — that it is not the fault of the enhancement/copying device actually breaking the Switch 2, but rather Nintendo deliberately doing something in response to someone having used such a device — means that this warranty, if interpreted the way you interpret it, is likely not legally a warranty under Magnusson Moss, and therefore, sale of the product with such a fraudulent warranty would be per se illegal in the United States.

You can't just write a bunch of contract terms down on a piece of paper and claim that because someone appears to have violated them, that person has no rights. The law doesn't work that way. A company can disclaim a warranty only for things that were actually damaged by the use of third-party hardware, software, etc., not merely because of the use of third-party hardware, software, etc. The law is very clear on this. Their warranty terms do not give Nintendo any right to disable a device, nor to return a device so disabled, merely because Nintendo *knows* that someone has done so, much less merely because Nintendo *thinks* someone has done so. The legal bar is far higher than that.

Comment Re:Major usability issues (Score 1) 136

Yeah it's so annoying to be able to search my history on Firefox for Android but not be able to remove items. But I can remove them from the history list if I don't search and just swipe until I find them. Very annoying. It is possible on a rooted phone to use sqlite directly to remove things from history, but not terribly convenient.

Comment Re:Trump has expanded the high skill work visas (Score 3, Insightful) 92

Add to that he's still talking about how the 2020 election was stolen. I see no evidence he will walk away peacefully at the end of this term. He's looking more and more like Putin all the time, as he has started to use the DOJ to prosecute his political opponents, often for simply doing their jobs. He hasn't resorted to pushing people off of balconies yet. He pardoned all the Jan 6 insurrectionists, and they are now waiting for his command. But most troubling, he has a complete disregard for the constitution, and his GOP enablers are right there with him. I don't see how any lover of the constitution could rationalize this so-called unitary executive theory. Combine that with the GOP's long-standing efforts to manipulate the vote through gerrymandering and voter suppression laws, things don't look so good for democracy. I'm really not at all sure what's going to happen at the mid terms, as far as trump is concerned. The fact that it's so uncertain, or that there's even a question of uncertainty is alarming.

Comment Re:Creating FUD (Score 1) 70

If you're smart, you'll return the console to Amazon as defective.

You can try, but is extremely likely Amazon would check on the status of your console with Nintendo and decline the return as the restricted product constitutes damage due to consumer abuse.

No, the damage is due to Nintendo arbitrarily declaring that the device is banned. Installing a game is not consumer abuse, period.

Also, I think you're greatly overestimating how much effort Amazon puts into defective returns.

Nintendo would end up with a huge pile of e-waste that they can't do anything with

They'll likely refuse warranty, so they don't have a pile in the first place.

DOA returns don't work that way. As a vendor, Nintendo has two choices: refund the money and pay for return shipping back to Nintendo or refund the money and let Amazon scrap the product. There's no warranty involved at that point.

If they actually did: Nintendo themself has the capability to clear the restrictions and make a note on their servers that the package is being repackaged for sale to a new customer.

Yes, they absolutely could do that, and no doubt would. But A. they would take a monetary loss on that, because by law they would have to then sell that unit as refurbished, at a discount, and B. they would have to pay for Amazon shipping that product back to them, pay someone to check the product and repackage it, and then pay again to ship it back to Amazon. I'd be surprised if that added up to less than a $150 loss every time it happens.

In other words, the financial loss to Nintendo would be far greater than the cost of the game that Nintendo incorrectly believes that this person stole, so if everyone did this, Nintendo would stop doing what they're doing, because it would be a net loss for them.

Slashdot Top Deals

Established technology tends to persist in the face of new technology. -- G. Blaauw, one of the designers of System 360

Working...