Yes, and he's also been saying that we'll have full self driving cars by the end of the year for the last 15 years or so. He said that his tunnel in Vegas would be full of self driving Teslas. He said that 10 years ago you'd be able to summon your Tesla from across the country. He said he'd build a hyperloop from LA to SF. He said that we'd have humans on Mars by 2021. He said that he'd have a fleet of over 1,000,000 fully autonomous robotaxis driving around by 2020. He said Tesla owners would be able to let their Teslas be used as taxis that would pay for themselves when the owner wasn't using them.

Elon says a whole lot of stuff. The vast majority of it is absolute bullshit that he's spewing to further his wealth and power. The fact that anyone believes anything that comes out of his mouth anymore surprises me.

Maybe people are just tired of him spewing absolute bullshit as fact while stealing our money, destroying our government, literally hurting and killing people, and just generally being an unlikable little troll that no one would even care about if he hadn't managed to leverage himself into a fuck ton of wealth and power?

This is different from property taxes how?

We tax unrealized gains there already. Why not do that with wealth as well?

> America First!

Funny how both of the times in America's history that phrase has been popular, it has been pushed by foreign dictatorship that wanted to weaken America by undermining its democracy and shoring up fascist friends of those dictators.

Putin pushes and like clockwork people are using it in posts advocating America abandon its promises - promises that were made because it was never in America's best interests to see a country like Russia invade Europe to begin with.

The slogan of cowards and traitors. Again. Like it was in the late 1930s.

No problemo, the agent can use your crypto to buy more tokens./jk (as of 6/12/2026)


Are the cryptobros that stoopid or do they think we're that stupid?!!

Even the summary said the match was only 93% probable. That's a LONG way from any reasonable certainty. (Out of 1000 people you'd have 70 matches. If you don't do other steps of elimination, what is the size of the population you're screening?)

Or more like "cloud infrastructure running within physical and legal jurisdiction of the EU is running locally to the EU" if you prefer .. if it's software they've written, running on hardware within the EU's physical and legal reach, voila, "sovereignty".

"The only way to ensure sovereignty and control is with software running locally with NO cloud dependency."

They're not talking about personal sovereignty. Cloud infrastructure an organization owns is "running locally" to that organization.

Indeed --- ICE is trained-to-purpose. Invading border-jumpers SHOULD feel terror, from the minute they approach USA border, to the second our anti-migrant drone explodes in their face. And surely one can design an anti-personal drone to detect "enablers" & pimps   with EMPATHY toward such narco-Mex mules, and also zero-in on those rabid quislings.

Perhaps not, but they are designed to *attempt* to only target the things they are aimed at.

I don't think that's a well defined term. Historically you can only figure out which actions were war crimes after one side has won, and decided to set up trials. The rest of the time different sides pick different actions.

No. They say "sinister".

Batteries are not a sufficient answer here. But when you add in a grid connection they work. The weather will be different in different places, so some places it will be windy, some places it will be rainy, and other places the sky will be clear. I think this works even in Britain, and that's North of Ontario.

"If we were to tweet something completely made up, there is a chance of legal troubles"

Then nobody could tweet/post/display FICTION. But ... that's a ridiculous constraint. Shakespeare & Joyce become Web-illegal. Better to simply admit that  *.ai/LLM/Japechats are "engines-of-fiction" rather than knowledge vendors(?) . LLMs are not "truth seekers" as Aristotle ( & common sense )  requires of intelligence, synthetic or otherwise. 

Other companies are selling them because they're not run in the same way Steam is. Steam might not be perfect, but they've shown an inclination not to go for the "profit at any cost" model. Newell is happy to put "Do no harm" over "Maximize value for what a psychopath thinks shareholders are"

Additionally a sizable number of physical gift cards are for brick and mortar services. Not all of them. But a sizable number.

Steam isn't doing anything "wrong with their gift cards", they're just choosing to opt out of being part of a way to defraud the vulnerable. There is no difference between their cards and anyone else's.

that particular amendment was voted down, bozo - the system works, no hand wringing required

doesn't mean hate speech doesn't exist