Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:private property rights? (Score 3, Insightful) 46

You make the standard Randist blunder worshiping tragedy-of-the-Commons". Your agency over your property ends at my property line. You may not pollute the air over my property ( by say...  burning shoes or clothes ) beyond "acts of god";  you are infringing on my property rights . Yep --- you may not "mine" on your own property if  mine  tailings/run-off crosses my property line.  Tuff tit to those sociopaths who would privatize profits while socializing costs.

Comment Re:Perhaps too early to tell? (Score 2) 51

Intense propaganda and physical abuse by data-manglers  is supposed to convince every Joe-Peanut that the lower standards of service/performance/reliability provides by *.ai/LLM is the STANDARD to be maintained. Kinda like convincing ice-cream eaters to buy air-foamed store brand ice-creame instead of buying heavy creame, vanilla-beans  and eggs and churning it yourself. When crap becomes the standard of excellence, excellence ceases to exist.

Comment Re:Depends on the topic (Score 1) 51

Almost ANY building task involves "specialty" or "hi-IP" input.' from  CS-grads building computer code to Amazon savages building water buckets. Yesterday I watched a film on members of the latter group ... savages if you will ... who raised water  from river to tree-top housing by rope+winches with JUST the number of holding  "knots" supportable by the vine-diameter from which the rope was created. Amazing "specialist" creation for an everyday task at the river; wife will be p*ssed without that bucket of water for rinsing veggies ! I believe all builders solve multiple "specialty" cases every day.

Comment Re:Ars Technica (Score 1) 90

Look twice, shoot once !  I checked the current ArsTek website for systematic AI-slop.  There's a prominent article on self-replicating quasi-enzymatic RNA. While my mol-bio is decades old I find the  science writing rational and human; quality popular science written/over-watched  by a biochem PhD. ArsTek is not dead yet.

Comment Re:Rich and powerful complaining to each other (Score 1) 59

"If AI is really about the future of humanity then why isn't OpenAI cooperating with the PRC on the further development of DeepSeek? "

Because Americans do not want a "Chinese" future, but a future based on Western "enlightenment" principles and (re)publican  governance. In Abrahamic cultures, the individual is (ultimately) only answerable to G*d [ "... thou shall not have strange gods before me"] . Not so with various Eastern collectivist memes. 

Comment Re:Not the solution, not the problem (Score 1) 102

Computer code --like all machines -- exists in the service of humans.  That service remains flawed. Computers are ubiquitous, yet only a few percent of humans can write professional-grade code. OTOH  nearly ALL humans can speak "poetically".  Perhaps it's long overdue for humans to exit  the "explicit" computer-code world and return to the poetic "Queens English"  concrete noun/active verb etc. Let computer code talk to computer code natively. Thus flaw removed.  Nekbeards/byteboiz  may become  not just mechanically un-needed, but  culturally unwanted. In extreme cases, humans can fall-back on the differential equations controlling computing/machine hardware.  Sure some BOFH will have cubicles ... but very very few ... kinda like sewage treatment plant operators.

Comment Re:It's because of policy (Score 0) 97

"...if there was better policy preventing money from going to the top of the economic food chain ..."

Dear lordy it's not policy, but (financial) physics.  Life depends on water -- right? Throw a lead weight ( say unions or SPH ) into a lake and the weight sinks to the bottom. But, throw a balsa-wood block ( t-shirt sweatshops or 996 ) into a lake and it floats like a hooker-on-coke. Been that way since Pharaohs servants were buried with him or Sythian kings were buried in gold chariots.

Any way to beat that outcome ? Yep; I know only one way. Upper Neolithic low population density w.r.t. natural resources. Then  if lucky you MAY get an  American Indian gifting culture with many many chiefs. Like a semi-floating organic island.  If not lucky you get the bloodthirsty Azteca cannibals.

Comment Re:A C compiler written in Rush (Score 1) 160

The *.ai constructed  C-compiler demonstrated mediocre performance. Nobody would pay a nickle for it. You have a life-time of hard work ahead of you, cleaning up the mess that LLMs have generated. That granted, current computer pervs are not 1/2 the issue. Excepting medicine, people hugely over-rate the industrial revolution and all its toxic follow-ons.

Slashdot Top Deals

There are new messages.

Working...