Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Risk reward and perverse incentives (Score 1) 42

All you constraints you advise are reasonable. I have no problem with "socialization of risk" ... as there IS nothing else, but social wants/needs. i would of-course strongly limit :"privatization of benefits".  Wealthy workers can  with great effort reclaim enshitified land. Citizens of my home-town of Scranton Pa got screwed-over by the mining interests, who took their profits from raping the beautiful valley ...  ditched the miners ... and left town. Scranton never recovered, and I suspect the same will be true for those providing energy/land for the LLM-farms.

Comment Re:Efficent code (Score 1) 65

Home and hobby users already have such an "efficient" system. My Debian-13 / MATE / Librewolf system running on  10 Y/O XEON-1240 / GF 3050 and 24-Gig DDR3 barely uses 15% of RAM during active surfing. Eight-cores are mostly asleep. I'd guess many of us non-gamers  have skipped the "RAMpocalypse". Granted , I'm on a slow WiFi network.

Comment Re:Risk reward and perverse incentives (Score 1) 42

A well-spoken argument ...  and to be balanced against the human desire for warmth in  icy winter and coolness in  roasting summer. Those are health,  productivity & agency  issues, crucial to risk/reward judgement, and  even more basic than toxic radiation. Stated crudely ... live like a savage or < threat of > die by radiation poisoning ... or coal-smoke ... of frack-contaminated water ... or three weeks of no sun & no wind ... or a huge solar-flare that takes out all common energy-producing electronics.  Indeed: the only case worth considering is the "worst case" ... because that's the one that kills you.  Thus ...  those  few who live unaccustomed to physical risk are poor judges of energy sourcing options.

Comment POS (Score -1) 160

Altman really is a sociopathic piece of shite; toxic as lead-sweetened wine.  Probably thinks HE is in good company. As a deep red social conservative,  I can see  -- thru Altmans' et. al. behavior -- the triggers  for rational "progressive" social views  & actions.  Damnable person.

Comment Re:The difference between a laboratory and a facto (Score 0) 68

"ye olde genetic bottleneck means all humans are fairly inbred"

Yes, this is standard dogma. And yet ... look around you . How many base-pair changes are required to change an average-human into a raving "mongoloid" ? Is that number 10^3  or  10^6 or ... just ... 10 ?  One unfortunate change in amino-acid sequence can destroy  an enzyme function. I know ... "...compared to other species..." , but that is not the issue.

Comment Re:Those aren't threats from AI (Score 0) 40

" Again, wrong target. Humans need to *use the tools carefully*."

You are assuming humans are rational agents, and in addition act in-good-faith. You make the  classic "Platonic" error, that virtue = knowledge. You imply < know the proper use of AI & all's well >. A sadly false assumption . More robust and lower-risk is to make the Calvinist error : that all humans are fundamentally irrational & corrupt ( in dealings with other people ). Then "physical" kill-switches make sense : kill-switches on AI ... kill-switches on insurance ... kill-switches on banking ... kill-switches on physicians : of-course the phrase [ kill-switch ] needs appropriate interpretation(s), but the meme is clear --- self-limiting tools --->  "this far and no farther". 

Comment corrupt (Score 0) 9

Scandalous, actually that academics at major institutions have been  AI-compromised, top to bottom. Three cheers for Uni  students calling-them-out ...  and damnation for the puerile excuses given by faculty. Were those excuses also written by AI ? I have yet to  see academics use the stock-industrial excuse ... that competition - natural and necessary -- drives quality to the lowest order.  Added-value really is (almost impossible ) , so slop commercial software/video/fiction/services out-compete human agents for cheapness and control-ability .  That also must hold true for academics , where creativity is  sparse as structure in a janitors closet. Nice work  .../code/devs/slopper ; META force be with you.

Comment Re:This shit needs to stop (Score 0) 19

Prussia invented ... what ? If memory serves,  Sumerian scribes  beat them to it by a few millennia. And Thespiae required <music> of their children ... to prevent savagery !  I'm ignorant about classical Chinese education, but ...   Historically,  the list of indoctrinating states  is very very long.

Comment rephrase (Score 0, Funny) 40

"FSF: Having control over the technology we use is a fundamental part of software freedom. Without it, you simply don't have the basic freedoms you deserve when doing any type of computing, large or small. " Please allow me to rephrase that: < FMF: Having control over the machine-guns we use is a fundamental part of firearms  freedom. Without it, you simply don't have the basic freedoms you deserve when doing any type of  machine-gunning, large or small. >  So true ... unless we are machine-gunning /JapeChat/dev .... then the Free Machine-gun Foundation speaks  without merit.

Slashdot Top Deals

God help those who do not help themselves. -- Wilson Mizner

Working...