Comment Republicans are trying to privatize it (Score 4, Insightful) 85
And you can bet your ass that if or when they kill the postal service the private alternatives will shoot up in cost like you wouldn't believe.
Colbert is a professional, and Colbert Report was hilarious, but the long downward spiral of his talk show is enough to give one pause. I’m sure he didn’t write it all but no doubt directed the material, and how could he not see the shift away from actually trying to be funny? We have enough sources to turn to for political adversaries, and what struck me was there always seemed a clear hilarious and non-partisan way to make fun of whatever Trump was doing, but it was also clear to everyone what they put out was incensed political opposition with god-awful attempts at humor taped on top. Let’s not pretend a lot of writers haven’t used major IP avenues to preach their own version of what they believe, rather than what is entertaining. Let’s hope it doesn’t go this route.
His audience loves that. He has a team of writers. The late show is a corporate product, not an artistic one. He's at the helm, but it's less of a reflection of his personal ideas and more what his producers think the audience wants. You don't like it? Well...it has a huge audience...and you're not one of them. It's like Sean Hannity, Ben Shapiro, Guttfeld, the Critical Drinker Twat, etc. Their shows fucking suck and are shittily written...but they have their audiences and they love it.
Guttfeld was unwatchable to me...not because I was upset...but I was just fucking bored. I would probably enjoy well written comedy from an adversarial viewpoint....even if I think you're a shitty person, if you make me laugh...I'll have a guilty pleasure good time. But no, conservative comedy just sucks...it's boring as shit...poorly written, unimaginative...there's a FUCKTON of things to make fun of liberals about and conservatives typically suck at it. The South Park guys were decent at it for awhile...but regardless, the point stands. Gutfeld has his audience. I'm not one of them...he doesn't care what I think and he will tailor his writing to what he thinks his audience wants.
If we discover that he's a huge Miami Vice fan and wants to rewrite the series, I am confident it won't look like his Fox News show.
My guess is that he will apply every bit of intellect he has to replicate Tolkein and give the most Tolkein-ian experience and it will look nothing like his old work.
In other words, a screenplay indistinguishable from the output of a LLM trained on the entirety of Tolkien's works, basically. No wonder Hollywood types are worried about their jobs.
By your logic, there would be no new electronic music. You don't need an LLM to generate EDM from algorithms based on what clubbers respond to. We had the technology 30 years ago and yet it's a thriving genre. Time will tell, but I imagine the 2 biggest and most famous fans of Tolkein can best an LLM slopping together a story. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if they used the LLM to help them or to judge their work. That would be a smart use of technology. However, the human touch and vision will be clear an apparent vs LLM sloppy shit.
Really, is an LLM to a writer any different than a drum machine to a drummer? We still prefer live drummers, even for electronic genres, to drum machines at live shows...yeah, some studio gigs are no longer there, but there are a lot of drummers working, despite being obsolete by your logic for over 30 years.
Which leads directly to my next point - damnit, why did there have to be two damn eu words in that sentence? I misspelled both amateur and manwhatever there, and I'm annoyed by it.
Also, how cheap must the guidance system be (if any of this is real)?
So, irritating reminders are a blessing well disguised.
Though I wonder how many of the problems can be traced to both the US and Canada being mostly empty. Of course there are a huge number of US counties that don't have psychologists, I'm surprised that it's only half! There are so many rural counties without enough residents to keep a shrink in business. It'd be like trying to setup an office in Dog River Saskatchewan. Who the hell are they going to serve? Brent and Hank? Brent doesn't need it and Hank can't use it!
Finally, the untold story of how the Hobbits discovered microaggressions and how the Ring got canceled for being a symbol of systemic oppression. Shadow of the Past? Perfect title â" itâ(TM)s literally the shadow that swallowed Colbertâ(TM)s once-great Late Show, the one that started hilarious and then slowly petered out under an avalanche of politics until half the audience ghosted it for good. Middle-earth just got Colbertâ(TM)d. Hard pass.
Are you really that clueless? Comedy is a profession and a day job for people like him. He's a devout Catholic and family man and none of his material suggests that...why?...because he's a fucking professional. He's writing jokes for his audience, not himself. Colbert is a very intelligent man with a huge passion for Tolkein and that universe. Historically, writing styles are not consistent between genres. Look at Jordan Peele. Key and Peele was a good sketch show. I enjoyed it, but not in my top 5...not even sure if it's my top 10 of the last 20 years, but his horror films were amazing and NOTHING like his sketch shows.
Colbert is a professional. He writes with that perspective because he thinks its funny and he has an audience that appreciates that. Look at Colbert report...a very sharp satire that was nothing like what you described. It just made fun of the ridiculousness of your politics, rather than really expressing much of its own view.
Shitty writers do what they know. You may disagree with Colbert's politics, but he's not a shitty writer. He will adapt to the project.
I am not much of a Tolkein fan...it's fine...not my top choice, but I always enjoy the movies. He is a HUGE fan. My guess is that he will apply every bit of intellect he has to replicate Tolkein and give the most Tolkein-ian experience and it will look nothing like his old work.
My prediction is Stephen Colbert's Lord of the Ring will reflect his perception of what his audience wants and what the spirit of Tolkein is and would never know he wrote it based on his past comedy work. Just like how Jordan Peele's comedy doesn't reflect his horror writing.
I know how it feels to be the angry complaining gamer. I can look at other people's words and feel it through them. Which doesn't change the fact that the premise for their emotions is a false one. Or, a silly one, like "it'll just be used to cover up sloppy work", as if one is an expert game developer and not an armchair quarterback.
I reject the sloppy work argument. It is a silly one. It is silly to say that about temporal antialiasing. Aliasing is not the result of sloppy programming, it is the result of downsizing an image.
And note that it is indeed possible for one's empathy to exceed their judgement to deleterious effect. It is unfair to criticize someone for keeping theirs in balance when that is contextually appropriate. It may shock you, but I actually come out fairly even on personality assessments. It has been difficult for me to achieve a balance between empathy and judgement, as I find it incredibly painful when someone else's feelings are hurt. But, being honest and direct is far less painful for everyone in the long run.
That you're making blanket assumptions based on a brief tech demo where it was added into existing titles by a third party as if that's going to be how every game will look from now on is just plain silly.
Since the baseline of the story is that a person trapped a car by standing in front of it, yes. I do think it would be that simple.
Those who do things in a noble spirit of self-sacrifice are to be avoided at all costs. -- N. Alexander.