"tracability" of a weapon to *solve a crime* is pure movie/TV nonsense.
You've been watching too many tv shows with poorly lit (in dim blue light) high tech forensics labs featuring zoom/enhance.
Literally all objects (not just firearms, or even "weapons", however you wish to define it) "can be used in crime". Where do you get this stuff from?
You continue to make things up. The "issue" (completely legal, and not in any way connected to reality) is which part is the serialzed component. This actually varies depending on the firearm.
You consistently seem so sure of yourself.
So never heard of hand loaded ammo?
No idea that folks routinely mill their own lowers in machine shops, and have for decades?
Why is it you just make stuff up?
I don't understand why SoftwareArtist thinks it's ok to outright lie.
> Gun manufacturing is a highly regulated industry.
Manufacturing *for resale* is highly regulated.
Why is it your post is almost completely counterfactual from start to finish?
You don't need any permits to manufacture and sell ammunition.
> They would have been fine with it. The second amendment guarantees states the right to form armed militias (or to put it in modern terms, armed police forces). It wasn't intended to give every individual the right to own guns for their own private use. That's a modern reinterpretation.
That is blatantly false. The original poster is quite literally lying,
"The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."
"The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."
All the doors in this spaceship have a cheerful and sunny disposition. It is their pleasure to open for you, and their satisfaction to close again with the knowledge of a job well done
Genuine People Personalities
IMO this is a good thing, not a bad one.
crypto is sentient?
this is why flatpak (and snap) sucks.
The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. -- Niels Bohr
