What is this bullshit. The article canâ(TM)t even get the source material correct.

âoe actually stronger on many other public sector values like transparency and asset integrityâ

  Ahahahahahahahahahahhaahahah

âoeCollege students need more connection. Therefore, use AI.â

Really?

Nobody thought that AI would reduce the number of radiologists. What concerned radiologists was that their pay would be reduced when a robot could do their job.

The real question is how much the per capita income of radiologists has changed to now, vs 5, 10, or even 15 years ago.

Reduce the effectiveness of solar panels by reducing global insolation. All you have to do is fuck up the planet just enough to close the gap making the perceived costs of going nuclear unpopular.

I canâ(TM)t even begin to describe how stupid this is.

Insert âoeHomey the Clownâ with a sock meme here.

I feel like Iâ(TM)m reading some kind of angry HOA letter. What the hell is this shit?

I think you are misusing the word trivial here. The level of engineering has made these sorts of speeds seem trivial but i assure you they are not.

You seem to be conflating the driver with the vehicle here. Building any car today en masse is no trivial matter. It is incredibly complex and expensive to do. Just because you can buy one at a dealership and press down on the throttle does make its manufacture trivial.

If thatâ(TM)s the worst climate related threat to our health, then Iâ(TM)m all for it.

Make it impossible to anonymously make 911 calls.

Create an alternate line (811?) that allows anonymity.

Filter accordingly.

And get paid top dollar to just screw around with LLMâ(TM)s all day trying to make them say offensive things?

And this is a minority stake, in a company that is not exactly performing well, at least by market standards. Things were much more severe for several other very large US auto manufacturers in 2008, which the Federal Government actually owned virtually outright.

Of course, the amusing irony is that of conservatives using a state owned company as a strategy.

This is probably some kind of advertisement for a private equity funded âoeemployment engagementâ application.

Clearly the company wanted to be clever, ironic, or get free publicity by hiring Chris Martinâ(TM)s ex wife. Regardless, I donâ(TM)t even understand the point. There is no connection between a cheating CEO and a happily divorced woman. They must have thrown a large amount of money at Gwyneth for her to do this ad, but it fails to be clever in any humorous way. The media sure likes it, though. Why? Probably because they were paid to.