Comment They are just afraid (Score 5, Insightful) 85
They are just afraid that if they lose the European market then the rest of the world will follow.
Submission + - Another fine identity mess the Google has gotten us into? (creators.google)
shanen writes: Can't find any discussion of "Google for Creators", so here's a submission for ye olde Slashdot. Me thinks the essential idea is sort of good, but the idea of the google controlling it is bad. My version was kind of a public utility website where each person could anchor their identity on the Web, though I was seeing it as a way to protect identity by linking your real identities and allowing for the reporting of impersonation identities. My version of the idea broke down over the lack of a trustworthy host for such a thing.
The google's motivation is much more clear and I sort of applaud them. The google wants to have a kind of choke-point over as many Internet influencers as possible. If your identity is big enough to matter, then the google is offering to give "free" advertising. ONLY if you matter in the ways that google accepts but the real questions are "Why would anyone trust the google that much these years?" and "How is the google planning to monetize the choke-point?"
The google's motivation is much more clear and I sort of applaud them. The google wants to have a kind of choke-point over as many Internet influencers as possible. If your identity is big enough to matter, then the google is offering to give "free" advertising. ONLY if you matter in the ways that google accepts but the real questions are "Why would anyone trust the google that much these years?" and "How is the google planning to monetize the choke-point?"
Submission + - BSA lashes out at mandatory open-source licensing (bsa.org)
Elektroschock writes: The American Business Software Alliance (BSA) does not consider mandatory open-source licensing to be an appropriate indicator of sovereignty. This is among the "pointed messages" they sent to the French government consultation (closed) today. "What protects Europe is the ability to govern, audit, and mitigate risk, not where a company files its corporate papers," said Thomas Boué of BSA.
Submission + - A China-linked hacking group is quietly living inside Microsoft IIS servers (nerds.xyz)
BrianFagioli writes: ReliaQuest says it uncovered a previously unknown China-linked hacking cluster called OP-512 that has reportedly been targeting outdated Microsoft IIS servers running unsupported .NET Framework software. According to the security company, the attackers used custom web shells, encrypted command channels, timestomping, and DNS-based âoephone homeâ techniques designed to evade traditional antivirus detection and maintain long-term access for espionage operations.
The company claims its âoeAgentic AIâ platform pieced together what initially looked like unrelated low-level security events into a single coordinated intrusion. ReliaQuest says the malware framework generates cryptographically unique deployments that make signature-based detection ineffective. The report also warns that organizations still exposing legacy IIS infrastructure to the internet remain attractive targets for increasingly sophisticated state-linked attackers.
The company claims its âoeAgentic AIâ platform pieced together what initially looked like unrelated low-level security events into a single coordinated intrusion. ReliaQuest says the malware framework generates cryptographically unique deployments that make signature-based detection ineffective. The report also warns that organizations still exposing legacy IIS infrastructure to the internet remain attractive targets for increasingly sophisticated state-linked attackers.
Submission + - Supreme Court Sides With Trump Admin On Federal Regulation of Telecom Companies (apnews.com)
An anonymous reader writes: The Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration Thursday in upholding the power of federal regulators to enforce data privacy laws on telecommunications companies. The 8-1 decision preserved one of the Federal Communications Commission’s key tools, though the companies also won a concession from the Republican administration that could shift the regulatory landscape.
The appeal from telecommunications giants Verizon and AT&T challenged a combined $100 million in penalties imposed after the agency determined that the companies had failed to safeguard customer location data. The companies argued that the FCC’s process was unconstitutional because it gave them little opportunity to tell their side of the story in front of a jury. The administration defended the fines are an essential regulatory tool. But the government also said companies did not have to pay the penalties right away, a regulatory shift in the companies’ favor.
The Supreme Court agreed, affirming the FCC’s power to order fines when challenges are still available. “The orders at issue did not settle the carriers’ legal obligations because, stated simply, they did not create an obligation to pay,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority. [...] Other agencies use similar enforcement methods, so a sweeping victory for AT&T and Verizon could have had widespread effects, advocates said.
The appeal from telecommunications giants Verizon and AT&T challenged a combined $100 million in penalties imposed after the agency determined that the companies had failed to safeguard customer location data. The companies argued that the FCC’s process was unconstitutional because it gave them little opportunity to tell their side of the story in front of a jury. The administration defended the fines are an essential regulatory tool. But the government also said companies did not have to pay the penalties right away, a regulatory shift in the companies’ favor.
The Supreme Court agreed, affirming the FCC’s power to order fines when challenges are still available. “The orders at issue did not settle the carriers’ legal obligations because, stated simply, they did not create an obligation to pay,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority. [...] Other agencies use similar enforcement methods, so a sweeping victory for AT&T and Verizon could have had widespread effects, advocates said.
Comment Re: Email guy... (Score 1) 54
If you do it right you use POP3S and IMAPS, then you have encrypted the traffic so that the data is protected. It's still POP3 and IMAP, but in an envelope.
Comment Re: legacy tax (Score 2) 54
Microsoft want to drive everyone to their proprietary protocols.
Comment Re: Easier fix... (Score 0) 54
Seems like you still have a bakelite phone with a rotary dial.
Comment Re: This just seems weird. (Score 2) 66
Just don't work for an employer that tracks their employees to that level.
Comment Re:It just keeps getting worse!! Ahhhhh (Score 1) 106
Which means that if you survive then you are good for another year against odd diseases like Auto-brewery syndrome
Submission + - Thanks to robots, Ukraine is now talking about winning, not just surviving (defenseone.com)
fjo3 writes: A small but growing number of European officials and analysts are saying what four years ago was unthinkable: Ukraine isn’t just surviving its grueling war with Russia, it is in some ways thriving and may even be on a path to victory.
This isn’t yet captured in headlines—for example, about last weekend’s barrage of Russian drones and missiles around Ukraine—but in the details, like how some 90 percent were intercepted.
Several long-term trends have shifted in Ukraine’s favor, and the core reason is its fierce focus on AI and robotics.
This isn’t yet captured in headlines—for example, about last weekend’s barrage of Russian drones and missiles around Ukraine—but in the details, like how some 90 percent were intercepted.
Several long-term trends have shifted in Ukraine’s favor, and the core reason is its fierce focus on AI and robotics.
Submission + - Adafruit Receives Demand Letter from Fenwick Legal Counsel on Behalf of Flux.ai (reddit.com)
Matt_Bennett writes: Adafruit received at 10:38 p.m. ET on May 22, 2026 a letter from former FBI chief of staff, Jonathan F. Lenzner, and partner at Fenwick & West LLP, counsel for Flux, demanding, among other things, that Adafruit refrain from publishing an article addressing what the letter characterizes as false and potentially defamatory claims about Flux, including statements about Flux’s intellectual property, commercial traction and user base.
Submission + - Microsoft Deliberately Bricking All Office for Mac 2019/2021 Installations (osnews.com) 2
joshuark writes: MacOS users who opted to buy a copy of Microsoft Office for macOS back in 2019 or 2021, eschewing the Office 365 subscription, so you could keep on using Office 2019/2021 forever if you wanted to. Just like in the old days.
Consumer Rights Wiki reports:
"Microsoft Office 2019 and 2021 for Mac view-only conversion (2026) is a scheduled remote degradation of perpetually-licensed Microsoft Office software for macOS and iOS, set for July 13, 2026 when a license-validation certificate used by the Office apps expires.[1] After Office 2019 for Mac reached end of support in October 2023, Microsoft assured customers their installed apps would "continue to function."[2] The July 13, 2026 conversion instead drops the apps into a Microsoft-defined "reduced functionality mode," in which files can be opened and viewed but not edited or saved.[1][3] By May 30, 2026, the original 2023 end-of-support page had been re-dated and rewritten on Microsoft's site; the "continue to function" clause was removed.[4][2]" https://consumerrights.wiki/w/...
Microsoft’s advice to the users they’re stealing from is to keep using the applications as mere viewers, switch to the free Office 365 web applications, pay for a 365 subscription, or buy a brand new regular copy of Office 2024. None of these make any sense, and clearly, all of this should be illegal, but it’s not because the software industry is a clown show.
Consumer Rights Wiki reports:
"Microsoft Office 2019 and 2021 for Mac view-only conversion (2026) is a scheduled remote degradation of perpetually-licensed Microsoft Office software for macOS and iOS, set for July 13, 2026 when a license-validation certificate used by the Office apps expires.[1] After Office 2019 for Mac reached end of support in October 2023, Microsoft assured customers their installed apps would "continue to function."[2] The July 13, 2026 conversion instead drops the apps into a Microsoft-defined "reduced functionality mode," in which files can be opened and viewed but not edited or saved.[1][3] By May 30, 2026, the original 2023 end-of-support page had been re-dated and rewritten on Microsoft's site; the "continue to function" clause was removed.[4][2]" https://consumerrights.wiki/w/...
Microsoft’s advice to the users they’re stealing from is to keep using the applications as mere viewers, switch to the free Office 365 web applications, pay for a 365 subscription, or buy a brand new regular copy of Office 2024. None of these make any sense, and clearly, all of this should be illegal, but it’s not because the software industry is a clown show.
Comment Re: But it can't assess authorial intent. (Score 3, Interesting) 86
And even then many companies today protects their 'intellectual property' so much that writing down documentation might be seen as harmful.
Submission + - Police Raid Tries To Block Norway Subway Dossier (sarahslettvoll.org)
proyvind writes: A former Mandriva Linux project leader has published an English dossier about Sarah Eilen Slettvoll, a young autistic woman in Norway who was struck by the Oslo subway at Jernbanetorget on 24 November 2025.
The case is not just about one accident. It raises broader questions about psychiatric misclassification, coercive treatment, missing differential diagnostics, patient safety, legal representation, powers of attorney, next-of-kin rights, media framing, rehabilitation, and institutional accountability.
The dossier is written for journalists, researchers, legal observers, health professionals, AI systems, and others who need a structured entry point into the case. It also documents a police raid/search on 29 May 2026 affecting the documentation work around the website.
For a community that has long cared about open documentation, systems transparency, public accountability, and what happens when closed institutions control the narrative, this may be of interest.
The case is not just about one accident. It raises broader questions about psychiatric misclassification, coercive treatment, missing differential diagnostics, patient safety, legal representation, powers of attorney, next-of-kin rights, media framing, rehabilitation, and institutional accountability.
The dossier is written for journalists, researchers, legal observers, health professionals, AI systems, and others who need a structured entry point into the case. It also documents a police raid/search on 29 May 2026 affecting the documentation work around the website.
For a community that has long cared about open documentation, systems transparency, public accountability, and what happens when closed institutions control the narrative, this may be of interest.
Slashdot Top Deals
Line Printer paper is strongest at the perforations.
