And none of it is ok.

It's one thing for these monsters to persuade others (or even believe) they are authorized by god and to encourage others to commit these acts but others should not be under the same illusion: law is a fiction used to justify acts - even if laws were*intended* to create balance, fairness, safety etc - which is not universally so - by far.

Look at the way the people making the laws behave around laws: Trump/Bibi have committed how many illegal acts recently? Does it in any way moderate their choices? Not that I can see yet somehow they paint the picture that those in other societies must abide by their pronouncements when they don't even follow the laws of their own society or the world at large.

'We' should stop using law as the fake justification for despicable acts and just admit to self interest and monstrous tendencies which need an outlet.

Preview on mobile !== bad

No but there's probably porn of shareholders getting what they deserve instead of destroying the world to feed their greed.

No but there's probably porn of shareholders getting what they deserve instead of feeding the the world to feed their greed.

So for example Trump decides that people in China shouldn't have whatever he doesn't want them to have this week, that makes it illegal - because one guy and his clown posse say so.

Is there concern for the greater good somewhere in there? ProTip: Is be interested to see the kind of moral and logical gymnastics you'd need to conclude 'yes'.

And actual it is fine to break the law without penalty - for example murdering people in another country without congress declaring war formally.

But pay now, right?

It's like some weird new form of religion where people cast off their ability to think...

Cast off their what? Where are you from?

Uhh, presumably Huang likes it becomes it drives sales? There's that.

Just think of it as AI companies have widened the market of people they can sucker. It doesn't need to get more complicated than that.

"Death once had a near-Chuck-Norris experience."

"When the Grim Reaper comes for Chuck Norris, he doesn't carry a scythe. He carries a white flag."

"Chuck Norris doesn't go to heaven. Heaven goes to Chuck Norris."

and now we see that a significant chunk of that revenue was allegedly on the back of ultimately illegal activity.

But what *is* 'illegal' really? Isn't it just: doing something against the wishes of whomever controls the narrative (and has nukes and other means of coercion) ? Not really a universal law is it?

"You must not have ponies or cheezeburger!"

"Not everyone agrees that we are the boss of them (even though we have nukes) - more (fake) news at ten"

This is UNAMERICAN - how are our home-grown tech companies supposed to monetise the lives of the students if they're offline?

* Think of the shareholders! *

Yep, he could install ring cameras inside the house as well the exterior and then they could sell access to the police as usual then the police could scope-out the room layout prior to forced entry to ensure the cameras catch their best side and the homeowner can get some nice footage of the approach to the entry. Full circle - everyone wins.

Unless 'The police must break the law' is also a law, why don't we all stop calling them LEOs?