Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment \o/ (Score 1) 44

"In a notice filed Monday, the company proposed standardizing the terms of all its markets that implicitly depend on a person surviving..."

Presumably they'll introduce standard terms which address the underlying problem:
* Payouts where odds x subscribers is way more than expected given the asymmetry between their knowledge and others' knowledge of the underlying odds.

In this case, unless they had someone close to the DoW "dreamteam" how could they hope to estimate the odds with any level of certainty?

How many of the subscribers were effectively insider trading?

Comment \o/ (Score 1) 124

Which is more concerning, that they can't understand that it cannot be a supply chain risk if they want it so badly or that they are misusing this designation as a punishment because they can't get what they want.

These people have weapons more dangerous than a bread stick - definitely concerning.

Slashdot Top Deals

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary saftey deserve neither liberty not saftey." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Working...