Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Lying to a fed is inherently a crime (Score 1) 167

So if you upload all your data to the cloud before border crossing and they ask you whether you have done so, then its a crime not to tell them and give them the link ?

I am not a lawyer.

You are combining two separate things, saying and doing.

With respect to saying I think your options include being truthful or stating that you exercise your right to remain silent.

With respect to doing I think your options include complying with a search of your data or saying that you do not consent to a search.

I think their options include confiscating your phone.

The above assume a US border. I’m not sure about an EU border, on a academic trip our university advised us to leave our computers at home since they were sibject to search and confiscation. Problem being things like a US version of some software using an encryption method not allowed in the EU.

In fact the act of uploading data and deleting it from your laptop before crossing would be identical to this case - destroying evidence

I think destroying evidence might require being the suspect of a criminal act where that data could be evidence. Plus possibly weird things like a judge instructing a jury that they may assume data was deleted to destroy evidence if they believe so.

Now, can you say the phone or laptop you are carrying is not your main device. That its just a stripped down device for travel due to the software you normally have installed, concern over compliance with foreign law (ex encryption), theft, malware, and spyware in a foreign country, concern over possible confiscation at a foreign border as warned by your university. If true, I suspect that is an option.

And none of it means US Customs won’t confiscate it. Which would seem another valid reason for not bringing your main device.

Even not bringing your laptop could be seen as the same thing - destroying or permanently hiding evidence.

That does not make sense.

Comment Of course, there's another problem with this (Score 1) 93

Despite being loaded with Trump appointees, the Supreme Court already ruled against the concept of tariffs imposed by Trump arbitrarily. If he wants to apply tariffs now, he has to provide documentation spelling out the legal framework justifying them.

The EU certainly understands this.

Comment Can confiscate phone at border (Score 0) 167

That would be a fifth amendment violation if they required it.

No a lawyer - but I've been told that crossing the US border is a special case and they can inspect your belongings. If you will not unlock the phone they are allowed to confiscate it.

Similar with laptops. When traveling to the EU for academic purposes our university told is not to bring out computers. That all sorts of things can trip you up at the border. For example a US version of software that has "military grade" encryption.

I'm not sure if it'll qualify as destroying evidence.

Not a lawyer- but I've been told that if you destroy data a judge may instruct a jury that they are free to interpret that as an attempt to hide evidence.

Comment Re:Plausible deniability is better (Score 1) 167

There should be an option for a password which unlocks the phone in a separate sandbox which is benign.

Or, alternatively, the password could simply wipe all your files (including any password databases) before it unlocks the phone - leaving the OS intact.

Maybe it could also add a couple photos of Donald J. Trump to your photo library at the same time.

Slashdot Top Deals

Due to lack of disk space, this fortune database has been discontinued.

Working...