Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:You know, fossil fuels keep Whole Foods stocked (Score 1) 131

Let's see, what's worse:

1. Having an EV ....

Fake Straw Man. No one said anything against EVs.

What was said is that fossil fuels are what delivers food to your local supermarket, and pretty much any other store and even deliveries to your home. So owning an EV does not mean one is immune from higher fossil fuel costs. Which leads to higher costs for nearly all consider goods. So that EV rebate gets wiped out by bad energy policy.

Comment NYT referring to wrong 10-point list and authors (Score 1) 131

... a war he started on a whim

Not really. US special envoy Steve Witkoff reported that during negotiations the Iranians claimed to have 1000 pounds of enriched uranium that could be further enriched to produce 11 nuclear bombs. A bluff or not, it is product to assume it true.

... apparently (nytimes) talked into it by Benjamin Netanyahu,

Not really. The Vice President recently pointed out there are numerous 10-point lists from numerous factions. And the one the NYT refers to is one rejected and originating from the Revolutionary Guard. Its not what the current cease fire and talks are based on.

Comment Bitcoin is a throw away demand ... (Score 1) 131

All I have are trump shitcoins

I am thinking that if Iran was a bit smarter, they would have required payment in the TRUMP coin (for how could DJT object to that?)

In Trump style negotiations, you always enter negotiations with things you are willing to concede on. Throw aways to trade for something you really want. Bitcoin is likely just one such throwaway. Like switching from Bitcoin to TumpCoin to "legitimize" the concept of being able to collect a fee in the first place, which seems to be a defacto violation of the laws regarding international waters.

That said, you know the f'n reason the USA created a standing Navy 250 years ago was so it would not have to pay tribute to the Barbary pirates in the Med.

Comment Re:Not impressive, a Pre-ML 1990s PC doable proble (Score 1) 39

And with the raw data in space, or non existent. There is no way anyone from earth can double check what was automatically targeted and destroyed.

Not necessarily. Perhaps the data is not needed during the decision making cycle. Getting the result, the answer, from processing that data be all that is needed.

The data can still be sent later when time is not critical. If nothing else its a good test case for the testing of the next release of the software.

Comment Re:Not impressive, a Pre-ML 1990s PC doable proble (Score 1) 39

Didn't they try to do that kind of image recognition in the 90s and find it unreliable?

No. At least on the desktop PCs I referred to. Now in an embedded system onboard a missile or something, that could have been a too much in the 1990s.

IIRC they tested it with tanks and found that rather that detecting tanks ...

Airplanes at airports is a much easier problem. Airplanes are also more distinctive than tanks.

Today Tesla's vision system is notoriously unreliable, and you would assume that in military applications the aircraft are going to be camouflaged.

Real-time is a very different thing. Its not what was demo'ed.

Comment Tech demo, RAD hardened CPU not needed (Score 1) 39

Could the point of the brag be that it's newer hardware? My understanding is that successive generations of earthling chips are more vulnerable to malfunction from cosmic rays, etc due to their much higher density. But I've totally not kept up. Is this still a problem?

This was a tech demo. What makes you think a tech demo needed a rad hardened CPU? I believe they added lot of shielding around an off-the-shelf CPU, as could be done with other recent hardware.

Slashdot Top Deals

Usage: fortune -P [-f] -a [xsz] Q: file [rKe9] -v6[+] file1 ...

Working...