Did you miss my second to last sentence entirely?
Perhaps you could crawl out of your side-bias and recognize that BOTH OF THEM ARE SHIT.
Most countries don't have nuclear weapons and seem to be doing okay.
Ukraine, for example. A nuclear state attacked them, and Ukraine is winning. Of course Russia didn't nuke Ukraine, because that would be suicide. Similarly, if Ukraine had kept and maintained its nuclear weapons, it wouldn't have used them, because that would have been suicide.
I was thinking mostly of the naval vessels, but yeah, Ukraine has allies with both. Or, is a vassal to countries with both, depending on how you want to look at it.
because unless a country needs nuclear for some other reason (primarily to keep nuclear weapons and naval vessels around),
So, basically, all of them, unless they want to be vassals of those who do have those.
Yes. Everyone who thinks it's great spending other people's money should remember you are other people too.
But
I'm not the "other people" they'll take money from
Thank goodness that nobody in the tech sector can live and work remotely! They'll never be able to flee, bwah ha ha!
They have no problem taking out loans on unrealized assets so if they are worth it to the banks, they can pay taxes on them.
Be careful of this kind of rhetoric.
Billionaire trickle-down-fuck-YOU-pay-for-it-pleb economics will ensure retired homeowners on a fixed income end up losing their homes, because tax the shit out of those 'urealized gains' called home equity..
Yes, exactly.
They never stop with "billionaires". That's not where the money is, not enough of it. It's going to be you; your house, your 401K, etc.
"That's one for you, nineteen for me
Oh look, more evidence of the ideological capture of slashdot.
A call to murder the president, +5 informative.
I mean you guys have tried what, 4x now? It's always ultimately about murder when the leftist nursery school doesn't get its way.
"too many" being once.
"the American rightâ(TM)s hostility to democracy" you say?
Do tell.
So if we're talking sides, which "side"
- invaded social media spaces, and then emplaced high level government agents within the relevant companies SPECIFICALLY to guide "public conversations" in the directions they prefer?
- pushed for vote-from-home, the most beautifully-crafted system if one wanted fraudulent voting?
- pushed for electronic voting, again simplifying and enabling large scale fraud?
- manipulated information, media, reporting and hid any information that called into question the mandated "It came from bats" COVID theory? And then worked hard to kill/hide the fact that the US actually funded gof work at the lab it seemed to come from?
- spent years telling us how far apart from each other we were allowed to stand?
I don't think Trump and his crew of morons is any better, but the idea that one side is better than the other is laughable.
Some would agree that yes, what was going on was inexcusable.
You "You used an AI"
(provides actual source)
You "I don't like that source"
Also you: I'm disingenuous as fuck.
definition of "socialism", which is: worker ownership of the means of production
Bzz, false. The dictionary definition of the term is:
a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies
See? No "worker ownership" — government ownership. Schools don't need to be owned by the teachers for public education to be socialist, they need to be owned by the government. And they are!
Same goes for retirement financing, and medicine for retires — with millions clamoring to expand it ("Medicare for all!!") — what GP enumerated. The "single-payer healthcare" — another euphemism — would be exactly that too.
Workers can own shares of their employers — indeed, Anthrophic employees do (and anticipate to profit handsomely). That's not socialism at all — not by the dictionary definition.
I blame the libertarians for making the definitions unclear
I blame you for pulling the definition from under your tail — and the morons upvoting you.
"anything the government does that benefits the people instead of corporations."
That's spelled "KKKorporation$". Make a note of it. Benefits the people, eh? The per-pupil spending nationwide went up (inflation-adjusted) from $9083 in 1989 to $13790 last year. And what did this expense buy us — the barely literate population unable to even define such terms as "socialism" correctly...
And they've adopted the word "democratic socialism"
The term (not "word"!!!) was adopted by "former" Communists, who've proudly elected a Senator some Congresswomen and, most recently, New York mayor. Who immediately proceeded to establish a government-owned supermarket.
While I'm sure we all appreciate the ä宣éf's opinion, lying about gross economic statistics and manipulating currency is fundamentally non-capitalist.
I'm not going to disagree with you that Western governments have done so themselves sometimes (for example, the US unstated policy for at least 50 years after WW2 was to keep the USD overly strong as an 'invisible subsidy' to our western economic partners, making their manufactured goods more price competitive; US consumers got cheap goods, foreign economies got to build their factories and economies), but China's economic manipulations are ceaseless and utterly one-sided.
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law. -- Roy Santoro