Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:who is protecting us? (Score -1, Offtopic) 62

No, he concluded that in 2024 when his not-democratically-selected candidate, a correctly-colored woman whose political career began with blowjobs to a very powerful West Coast mayor - a last minute "fuck you" by Mr Biden to the party that abandoned him - got whomped by an odious, blowhard NY property developer whose multi-year vilification 2016-2020 turned him from a publicity-seeking opportunitist into a hardened "opponent to everything leftist", made fantastically easier by the lefts own purity-spiral politics, driving even moderate leftists and EVERY SINGLE US DEMOGRAPHIC ASIDE FROM WHITE WOMEN to swing their votes rightward.

This just gives him a chance to complain about it again.

Comment Re:who is protecting us? (Score 1) 62

I believe that the USA is facing its "Hitler" moment, where about 33% of White Nationalists are taking over everybody. They don't seem to care about what is in the United States Constitution, nor about the concept about forming a More Perfect Union. It is pure selfishness.

You definitely need to step away from the things that use data centers (social media, chatbots ...).

Comment Re:A lot of Americans... (Score 1) 46

Are regressing back to superstition and pseudo-science. Bigfoot doesn't exist.

Well, why not? It's mainstream now to dabble in sympathetic magic. "If I dress like and pretend to be that sort of person, then I am that sort of person! And everyone else HAS to agree!"

Honestly, cryptids seem rather mild by comparison.

Comment Re:2TB SSD (Score 1) 67

What in the actual fuck are those tabs doing eating gigabytes of RAM? And why in the fuck are most Chromium based browser installs now almost a gig of storage?

Never going to say that we can't optimize something better.

But let's get real - the engines have got insanely more capable. We can do things with just CSS now that it took reams of JS to do before, if you could even do them.

But -- we can do that because the browser engine is now capable of it.

Comment Re:Depends on your goals, I guess. (Score 3, Interesting) 84

I looked at a waterfall project where the mayor ended up spending $3M to have an audit done on the current state of a project that was way behind on time and way over budget, only for them to come back and say that it'd be cheaper to burn all the effort to date and start fresh.

Comment Re:What I don't like about Dawkins (Score 1) 383

XX = ALWAYS female. No alternative. If you are healthy you have a womb and can bear babies. They are intrinsically connected. You have large gametes.
XY = ALWAYS male. No alternative. You cannot ever bear babies, no matter how healthy you are. You have small gametes.

If they ever dig up your body, this is how you will be identified. Your feelings have *nothing* to do with the matter. Nor does your sanity. They will 100% identify you according to the actual, empirical physical characteristics that make you male or female (or a genetic sport of some sort).

That you keep repeating the delusion just makes you delusionAL.
No matter how many times you repeat 1+1=3, it's still not true and never will be.

Comment Re:What I don't like about Dawkins (Score 1) 383

Facts > Feelings.

If you have XX chromosomes, you're female and thus a woman. Cutting off your tits or bolting on a Frankenphallus just makes you a woman with surgical alterations.
If you have XY chromosomes, you're male and thus a man. No amount of makeup, women's underwear, or stripteasing in front of children will change that.

Anything else is an aberration and, like a one-armed person or someone born without eyes, recognized defective. It doesn't make them less human, but the idea we should just pretend that's normal is a weird delusion.

Comment Re:Rethinking our approach (Score 2) 106

No, if you base it on IP address, then it's pointless to lock out attackers because they have more IP addresses than you can ever hope to lock out. And consider your authentication system design, potentially having to keep track of tens of millions of locked IP addresses per user account...

I have never encountered a system that took IP addresses or even networks into account when deciding whether or not to lock an account. If an organization is aware that someone is trying to crack your account and they do use lockouts, but don't lock it out globally, then IMO they are at risk of a lawsuit.

lol okay. I work with a bunch of website clients and multiple hosting companies. We use systems that lock out by individual IP address all the time. E.g. 5 failed login attempts from the same IP address; that address gets blocked (for X hours).

It's not pointless at all; it works well. It's not a panacea - nothing is - but it's a nice layer.

Slashdot Top Deals

"If Diet Coke did not exist it would have been neccessary to invent it." -- Karl Lehenbauer

Working...