Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Can you (Score 1) 30

Given what Apple did with Airtags, it seems doubtful that they will make any meaningful effort to enforce the privacy rights of others. When Airtags came out they were a stalker's dream, and even now, after Apple make some token effort to address the issues, they are one of the most effective way to track someone without consent.

Comment Re:The only way to stop the Nazis (Score 1) 62

I hate to sound like Infowars, but you are being lied to. Nobody has been arrested for calling a politician a "dummy".

The Telegraph is a British newspaper that often lies about this stuff, including when people in the UK are arrested. They claim it was because of a tweet or because a journalist reported something, but in reality it's because they made a credible threat or tried to interfere with an on-going criminal trial.

In this case it's true that technically if someone makes a complaint a person can be prosecuted for insults in Germany. However, the reality is that any prosecution has to be balanced against proportionality and freedom of expression, and will rarely proceed unless there is some other aspect of the crime that warrants it. In this case, the person in question has been posting anti-Semitic stuff on Twitter, and Germany does actually have strong laws when it comes to things like holocaust denial and promotion of Nazi material.

Come on, just think about it for a moment. If people were being prosecuted for insults in Germany, every school kid would have a criminal record and there would be North Korean levels of paranoia.

Comment Re:Plausible deniability is better (Score 1) 204

They don't usually do this at a border check, but if they use a forensics terminal it's not running the OS, they basically do a backdoor boot and look at what the hardware reports.

The key point here is that data's security isn't enforced by the OS, but rather by the encryption algorithm itself. A non-OS forensics terminal would see the raw contents of the hard drive, which is to say, blocks of random-looking bytes that might be encrypted data or might just be truly random; without the corresponding password, there is no way to to tell.

Without any password (and assuming a robust encryption implementation), that's as far as they'd get. With a password, they'd be able to decrypt the blocks associated with that password and view the files for that account, but not any of the other blocks/accounts.

At that point, the FBI's nerds might well suspect that there are other accounts on the phone that they don't know about, but short of coercing the phone's owner into providing additional passwords, that's as far as they could get.

Comment Re:Relative skillset (Score 1) 122

It shouldn't be, but it's so hard for graduates to get through the door because every job ad demands experience now. Employers don't want to train or develop talent. The whole thing needs fixing, but it's the tragedy of the commons where most employers just see that they can demand experience and put no resource into training.

Comment Re:They could easily win back market share (Score 1) 57

They probably think that an ad blocker isn't original enough, because many other browsers have them. Not a unique selling point, and to be fair they are probably right.

Unfortunately there aren't any other good options for running uBO. Brave is shady, nothing else both supports full uBO and a reasonable set of other features. Firefox is the only choice.

Slashdot Top Deals

UNIX was half a billion (500000000) seconds old on Tue Nov 5 00:53:20 1985 GMT (measuring since the time(2) epoch). -- Andy Tannenbaum

Working...