Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Corporate policy (Score 1) 105

Yes, I was. Thanks for acknowledging your error.

You do raise an interesting point. Under my plan, the strings would be that you work on whatever was funded. A think a monthly report indicating what got done would be reasonable. That's about.

If you wanted to be more robust, maybe one string would be that a percentage of time would be spent on different project areas, such as bug fixes, new features, documentation or whatever. I can see that.

Other than that, not sure, I could see a temptation to want to direct the work (I.e work on what I tell you to work on). That would NOT be reasonable. The project needs to remain under the control of whomever, not Google.

Comment Re:Many people would never want a PC (Score 2) 31

Exactly.

It doesn't matter if I can get a 15 seat bus for the same price or less as an SUV that holds 5 people. I don't need room for 15.

Same thing when PC vs console. It doesn't matter that the PC can do all kinds of other shit, when I want is something to play games on.

That's especially true given that the PC introduces a whole suite of complications I don't want to deal with.

On that note, I'm in the market for a PS5, not a PC.

Comment Corporate policy (Score 1) 105

Google could create a new corporate policy to provide a minimum of $1M/year to any open source project it uses.

That would be real innovation.

The effect on Google's bottom line would be completely negligible, not even a rounding error on a rounding error.

If $1M is more than necessary, make it $100K, or whatever is appropriate, but substantial. Fund at least be definitely on every project it uses.

Invite its peers to do the same.

Slashdot Top Deals

Every little picofarad has a nanohenry all its own. -- Don Vonada

Working...