That would affect the buyer's rights with respect to the seller, not not his rights with respect to the gaming company.
That is surely what the other lawyer would offer as a counterargument. I would also expect that there is something about hardware based bans in the terms of service, which the buyer would have to agree to in order to access the online game.
Skydance is the company name, the brands are remaining the same.
Sydance is one of those pre-existing brands. "Skydance Productions was an American media production and financing company"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I wonder whether this is legal.
Sold "as is" could conceivably be interpreted as banned from a game due to prior abuse. Its plausible a lawyer could successfully argue this.
The CPUID instruction gives a lot of information (including serial number)
Not since the Intel Pentium 4, presumably AMD also stopped returning a unique value long ago.
CPUID doesn't give you any serialnumber or other unique id.
They briefly did in the Pentium 3 era, the confusion lingers as the functionality exists in CPUID but it no longer returns an actual unique value.
CPUID identifies a processor model
I think you meant to say a unique serial number. I believe Ryzen 7 reports those.
we wanted a name that would give the combined company an identity of its own while allowing Paramount and Warner Bros
Correction: "we wanted to use the brand name that was the less tainted"
No, the original conversation was about all Chinese models. You just went into it with your ignorance and you keep demonstrating it.
Wrong. This thread's originator started withe a long list of abuse and stupidity of the CCP. I pointed out that same failure will occur with their frontier-level models. You started talking about little local models that you described as "modest".
But even so, what's the empirical evidence these "big remote stuff" is "handicapped by training"?
Because you can't fix a problem unless you understand the truth of the problem. The alternate universe of the CCP's Great Firewall will not lead to such truth, just to the political dogma. Hence inferior models within that Great Firewall..
a massive underwater band of warm water
And California based scuba diver's rejoice. Thinner wetsuits and less lead weights to balance it out.
That's just your straw man.
Back at you,
Not really, because the original conversation was about the big remote stuff, in particular for their domestic market where it would be unhelpful to contradict the Great Firewall. You just misunderstood, and cling to what referred to as local models running on "modest" hardware.
After visiting your ophthalmologist, because I wrote "60s"
My bad.
"we need to streamline this and get better faster" - so let's create a new bureaucracy and fill it with people, rules and regulations!
To be honest, without this unified command, we'd have six military branches all doing the same thing without any coordination.
I realize people hate Space Force because Trump created it, but in reality its unifying the efforts of various military branches and civilian agencies is a good idea. OK, the name could have been better, and the dress uniforms are definitely a bit too much. But the real work they do is good.
The 1960s checks in with the adage: "To err is human. To really fuck things up requires a computer."
80s? I expect that originated in the 1960s if not 50s.
Russian-Owned Snooping Software Used By US Secret Service
Would be OK if its pirated and not paid for.
The confused here is the moron who cannot even name the openweights Chinese model that is 'handicapped by training' so that we can verify that fact.
We aren't talking about your local models on modest hardware. That's just your straw man. We are talking about the much larger models running on cutting edge hardware, remote models. In particular those created for Chinese internal use, things behind the Great Firewall.
Science and religion are in full accord but science and faith are in complete discord.
