I keep seeing people say this. If the tech were in fact getting better at an exponential rate for the past 3-5 years, we would be at the actual Singularity today. We would already have reached the end of human history as the apex mind on this planet.

But semantic nit-picking aside, you still have not shown your work and established why you believe that we know the current growth rate (of whatever mathematical type) will continue indefinitely.

We haven't seen a Singularity before. We haven't created a synthetic mind before. We barely know anything about what our own minds are and how cognition works. Even with a truly exponential growth, we have zero measurement tools that can tell us what that exponent is and whether the Singularity will happen at n=2, or n=2,000, or n=2.21x10^273

And this is why cryptocurrency was designed for users to hold their own wallet keys on their own devices. Not some 3rd party service.

Before he was chosen for Picard in TNG I coincidentally saw him in some old BBC production of Julius Caesar on late night cable (or was it the weird VHF channel for local broadcast, not channels 2-13, IDK). When the TNG cast was announced I actually recognized him. I thought it was going to be interesting to have a trained British Shakespearian Actor as a "Star Trek" captain. Turns out it worked out pretty well.

Existing products usually cannot remain static. Otherwise an opening is created for a competitor. And frankly controlling a computer through spoken natural language seems a quite reasonable thing to pursue. Are they creating the proper and safer tools for that? That is the real question.

On a beach near where his bunker is under construction in anticipation of the AGI.

There are cold weather gloves with some special material that allows the use of touchscreens (smartphones). Perhaps looking at fancy gloves on the REI site or similar will mention the material?

And yet there are no criminal charges,

And yet there are no civil charges which require a much lower threshold of evidence.

In the past there was one civil charge where the JURY specifically rejected the charge or rape and found him guilty of sexual assault which seems to have been groping.

What is your theory of why there are no new criminal charges or new civil charges?

I am not ignoring, I am noting that there are no new criminal or civil charges. That speaks to the evidence.

And as you know on rare occasions some women falsely report sexual assault. How do we tell the difference between the two groups?
Professional sexual assault specialists, investigators and prosecutors, look at the evidence.

Again, what is your theory of why there are no new criminal charges or new civil charges?

While you are more rational, the other posters are definitely TDS Pizza Gater 2.0'ers. They provided nothing more than circular Pizza Gate logic. You have done much better but the fact remains that professional sexual assault specialists, investigators and prosecutors, looked at the evidence and have not filed charges.

Again, what is your theory of why there are no new criminal charges or new civil charges?

Nope. While you may not be a Pizza Gater 2.0'er, others certainly are.

And the fact remains, if evidence is found and Trump is prosecuted and jailed for life that would be just fine.

What does compromise your judgement to a degree is your conflation of accusation and evidence, accusation and guilt. That is very different than Pizza Gater but it remains a defect.

Again, what is your theory of why there are no new criminal charges or new civil charges? There has been a successful civil case, why not more?

Yes, but encouraging people to use their day-to-day computer or phone is a bad idea. For online banking one should have a dedicated computer or phone that is used for nothing else. Perhaps a dirt cheap chromebook, or an old PC or phone that has had a factory reset and still gets updates.

Nope. As I said, happy to see him prosecuted and jail for life if there is evidence. The fact remains no victim is charging him, no prosecutor is charging him, and New York is full of prosecutors that would love to charge him. Why don't they? The evidence isn't there

What is your theory of why there is no prosecution?

Which translates to no real evidence. If there was evidence he would have been prosecuted and convicted as he had in the groping case.

And one filed charges and he was was found guilty of sexual assault for groping. Rape was on the list of charges and the JURY said no, it was not rape.

Any of those other women could file charges, or a prosecutor could file charges if the evidence is good enough, that fact that no one has speaks volumes to the unreliability of the claims.

Absolutely false. The jury specifically said not to rape, they convicted only on the lesser charge of sexual assault for what sounded like groping.

That does not change the fact that while within limitations no alleged victim and no prosecutor took him to court. Except for one case mentioned above.

Plus I think New York changed their statute of limitations, if so charges would in fact be possible again, and still no one comes forward with charges.

No, the debate is over why he was kicked out. Member daughter vs employee poaching. Then again, maybe it was both.

And if there is sufficient evidence to prosecute him and send him to jail for life that is fine with me. But as things stand its today its just TDS fantasy. A Pizza Gate 2.0.

Nope. Thinking there is a significant difference is your error. After graduation I worked for a European company, specifically with a team of 5 European engineers who were adapting US equipment for EU standards. In our off time we compared note, superficial differences. They considered me among the top engineers. That includes our European VP of engineering that said I was welcome to apply for transfer to their EU headquarters for a few years if I were interested..

Nope. Happy to prosecute and jail for life if there is evidence.

True. ...in the same way a subway flasher "drives discovery" of novel content for female passengers.

What? Toilets don't run on electricity.

Assuming you do in fact only have one vehicle, is it really such a huge deal to be without power for an hour while you run to the grocery store?

I don't know why, but it looks like a cool background for a movie or series into credits.