Comment Re: Not Flock (Score 1) 27
The detective is paid to maintain the status quo first and think second, like every other cop, except that he's actually paid to think at some point.
The detective is paid to maintain the status quo first and think second, like every other cop, except that he's actually paid to think at some point.
It's AGPL, not just GPL
We had a small resurgence in some workers cleaning cabins, they switched protocol to using liquid before cleaning to trap dust from feces. It's never really contained.
I'm not the person in this thread denying that demonstrable reality exists.
Whoosh.
Wait, yes I can run a model that plays a video game in a certain way.
Anything else entirely unrelated to the linked article you'd like to write?
A global workspace. The thing you're arguing against.
And as for emergencies just buy a radio.
"It's right next to the toilet paper...oh, wait"
No. Trump was overleveraged and the last bank that would do business with him was Deutsche Bank until he made whatever deal they made with the Russians... Pedo Jr. and Eric both told us they were banking with Russia.
I wouldn't be surprised if the all-in COST of making an AM radio work decently in an EV was at least into the hundreds of dollars.
I doubt this very, very heavily. If it were so they would have told us so already as their excuse. These days the typical radio antenna is an amplified module mounted to the roof, this is now cheap and it gives better reception without the sticking-up aerial or with just a short one.
Let me be clear: you don't have to accept any implications from the existence of a global workspace in models and how they use it. If you want to argue "they have a global workspace but not qualia", hey, knock yourself out.
But you do need to understand that it does exist.
And yet, making it back safely actually appears to be the smaller problem at the moment
It really doesn't.
I'll repeat: sum Launch and Starlink, and they're deeply profitable. You can't change that basic equation. Falcon launches run just under breakeven in order so that SpaceX gets a cash printer launched into the sky. You can say "they aren't profitable" all you want, but meanwhile in the reality we live in, Launch + Starlink is not only profitable, it's very profitable.
Also, if they weren't launching Starlink, others would be anyway. There's a massive rush on for LEO constellations. Nobody in the industry sees it as plateaued. There are entire categories of markets that are almost entirely untapped (for example, direct to cell; even aviation and maritime are only just getting started; military is a MASSIVE growth market especially - the Pentagon is contracting out building its own entire private Starlink constellation). If we talk Starlink in specific, it only has 12m subscribers. HALF of all households globally lack broadband. Fibre isn't going to be getting out to the overwhelming majority of them any time remotely soon. Where there's saturation for Starlink, it's supply saturation, requiring the large V3 gigabit satellites to increase service density. They've hardly expanded at all thusfar out of western nations (there's more price sensitivity in developing nations, so you need lower pricing tiers, but the added service is almost pure profit).
And I'll repeat that even if Starlink weren't growing, even if it were absolutely fixed today, it would remain a cash printer.
Anyway, for the record, I do believe that LLMs are conscious, but only Deepseek, because of the Chinese Room theory.
May the bluebird of happiness twiddle your bits.