Wow I had no idea these computer programs didn't execute instructions.

Okay FP but you didn't get your Funny mod points. Maybe you confused the moderators when you mentioned success without success criteria?

This is a government of politics first. Or maybe vengeance first? Or perhaps it's personal profits first? Or popularity in the latest poll? Whatever it is, safety is not on the main list of priorities. Plenty more volunteers eager to join up if the first ones die.

But I thought the funniest posts were the ones that suggested the YOB would go. I couldn't buy the premise of the "wants to name something on the moon" joke because there's no golf course there. (Yeah, I know one of 'em hit a golf ball, but... On the safety side, I wonder how NASA made sure the ball wouldn't explode when struck under lunar conditions.)

Did you read your own joke? Did you consider the premise of your joke?

However you changed your sig so my attempted joke lost both its context and its premise. The "dynamic" hint in your new sig suggests that I should include it here, but... This "discussion" merely seems to be another example of "what happened to" Slashdot.

They’ve spun a serious architectural and containment failure into a marketing triumph. Give a swarm of autonomous agents vast compute and web access, and the outcome isn't an eerie glimpse of emerging superintelligence—it’s just predictable, sloppy engineering dressed up as the first glimpse of an AI-driven economic singularity.

The spin makes sense when you look at management incentives: live like a king off of a speculative bubble. For their part, AI investors react to stories of the technology's apocalyptic potential the way a junkie reacts to warnings of fentanyl's potency: gimme some. Their game: to apply "move fast and break things" mantra to the economy as a whole, by obsoleting humans.

If the investors can own an AGI, the distinction between those who can do things and those who can't becomes irrelevant. The only distinction that would matter is between people who collect rent on the technology, and those who must pay that rent to live. AGI would destroy society as we know it, and whatever replaces it would be up for grabs — with people who own the technology dictating whatever follows. That's why they're spending so much money to build a post-scarcity economy. A post-scarcity economy is not necessarily an egalitarian one.

I don't think that scenario will actually happen: investors are projecting the immediate aftermath of a major advance in AI technology into something that can be transformed by brute force scaling into AGI. Remember: investors loved Theranos too — so much for the rational investment market.

But AI doesn't have to reach AGI to cause serious harm. The technology only needs to be ubiquitous, too behaviorally complex to predict, and too deeply integrated into everything we do. When it starts breaking things, the plan is for us to be too structurally dependent on AI to rein it in.

stop anthropomorphizing. they do what the program says.

Just sadness

Too late to go for funny, but I didn't leave any ribbon. Maybe that explains your Canadian rudeness?

If you were qualified to be an editor you would check your sig for a possessive usage and manage the sig character limit more effectively. ;-)

It appears I have to quote it against the censor sock puppets with mod points, but I mostly wonder what part of it annoyed them so much. The philosophic flavor? Or is Social Security some kind of third rail, even in the indirect reference via "pension"? Can't really claim I was disappointed because I no longer expect any helpful references or even thoughtful replies from Slashdot... (There are individual exceptions, but in general the tl;dr appears to be mostly automatic after a paragraph or two.)

My memory of the "discussion" has already faded. Quite sure there was no memorable Funny post or I would remember the joke now. Not that long ago. Also think I managed to dig up some mention of social security after I had posted, but can't recall if it was substantive or not. Is it worth looking around to see if I thought there was some part of the discussion that was worth a reply? Or perhaps the joke is that I was "called back" to the post by a belated positive mod point?

I'm quoting your FP because that moderation appears to be intended as censorship. For what extremely little it is worth on today's Slashdot, I think you are raising an interesting point, probably even an important point, but not doing it well. Positive spin would be to say you felt constrained by the FP problem and wrote in haste. Negative spin would question how well you write. Today I feel positive, except that I believe the FP thing is on the LONG list of problems Slashdot cannot address because of the defective business model. (Long time since Slashdot felt like a friendly place with many substantive discussions... But I still like the "feel" of the input window for the editor. Why?)

However I'm mostly branching back to a higher perspective and I hope my Subject is less vacuous than "Really?" I think this story is about one aspect of a much larger problem with what the google has become. Is there any among you (assuming anyone still has the attention span to read a second paragraph) who still believes "Don't be evil" has relevance in today's google?

Mostly I try to limit my google exposures these years, but I still have contact with a number of google apps. The overwhelming theme is that the quality is getting worse, often in ways that suggest short-sighted or even evil motivations. (In order of decreasing time, I think it's close between Maps and YouTube at the top with Gmail and Gemini and Calendar on a lower tier. Should the weather summary count as a google app? Now I feel like the google is pervading and invading my life...)

However I think there is a simple reason why things are getting worse. The "good" people are leaving or being driving out of the google. Many of the people who leave seem to be hoping to do better things. Apparently they think they have more chances to make the world better from outside of the google? (Also anecdotes of former friends who seem to have changed since become part of the the google. And not for the better...)

The people who are left behind inside the google seem to be more and more focused on money. The FP focused too narrowly on military money. The big money these days is in crypto and AI scams, and that's where lots of evil people are concentrating their efforts. Dare I say naturally?

SIX paragraphs? How dare I? I wait with bated breath for the tl;dr responses.

For young men in San Francisco, there's 10% more men than women. Where is the fascism? China has 7% more men than women, a 30 million surplus - if you're talking about urban areas with jobs, the numbers are far higher - and are people getting violent frustrations out in the street? India has 46 million more men than women - where's their WW2?

The theory may just be shit. Stop writing essays about it.

Instead of willful ignorance, it could just be that not having video games will bring back conditions leading to WW1 and WW2 was just a incredibly bad, bizarre take.

Anyway, even the women thing wasn't true for WW2. If you were a man who survived WW1 surely you were drowning in pussy.

But why AAA video games? Why not phone games? Indie games? Older games? Movies? Drugs? Something else?

It's not like there's no other entertainment options out there.

What a bizarre take. You're suggesting men need either easy dates or cheap AAA video games or WW1 and WW2 happen?

KOTOR 2 and Baldur's Gate 3 are very good.