Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:gotta catch 'em all (Score 1) 67

A lot of printers are poop. A lot of printer drivers are poop, including ones for Linux. If I want my printer to "just work" then I need to install packages. Luckily Brother produces them, and they have been doing so for years now. I've done several OS upgrades and always had new drivers available to me for them. But if they didn't do that, it would still work, I just wouldn't be able to use it via USB. My Laser PSC supports both printing and scanning via standard protocols. The only thing that wouldn't work is the on-device buttons, which I don't use anyway.

Therefore this is either user error at setup time, or user error at purchase time. That is no comfort to a home user, but we're talking about a nation here.

Comment Re:gotta catch 'em all (Score 2) 67

Windows isn't easier, but it costs about $2000 per seat to train people to use an new operating system. Once you are past that expense, Linux is cheaper because it doesn't require retraining every time Microsoft obsoletes it's old UI. Google Docs does a fairly good job of handling Microsoft Office file formats now, so document backwards compatibility is no longer an issue.

Comment Mix of culture and MONEY. (Score 1) 195

First, look at South Korea. They have the worst birthrate (not fertility) problem. Over the past 80 years, they created a culture focused on work with no work-life balance. Employees are expected to get drunk with their boss after work, rather than go out looking for a date or go home to their family. While they now offer things like paternity leave, if you take it, you lose the chance to get promoted. Which leaves you too poor to raise a child.

Next, our culture has allowed the costs of raising a kid to rise to about 1/2 million us dollars or about 8 times the average US income. This encourages women to make their number one consideration how much money a guy makes. If you see a beautiful woman with an unattractive guy you think he is rich.

There are a lot of factors involved in this issue, including the importance and expense of school (both lower grades and university), and the obsession with spending money on expensive things to get into the right college (after school activities). In the 1950s your average yearly college cost of a GOOD school was half the average salary, Now it approaches double it.

If we really want to encourage people to have children, no amount of tax discounts will do. You can't remove a mountain with a shovel, you need excavating machines.

We could put high taxes on any university that has more than half of their students paying more than half the US average salary. This would focus more of the money on education rather than research, which does have consequences.

We would also have to require them to separate out any activity that cost any money to do in their admissions applications and make it only apply to people paying full cost. That would specifically include people attending private high schools. If you can afford to go to them, you have to pay full price college admissions - and only compete against others.

This would punish certain states that are trying to save public money by encouraging parents to put their kids in private schools. NO. Do not make it more expensive to raise kids in order to save taxes for the wealthy in your state.

Then there is food and healthcare. They should be near free to all children under the age of 18. Every school should offer free lunches to all students - and require them to be both healthy and delicious. This is NOT hard to do, other countries do it all the time. Sweden, Brazil, India are fine examples. The trick is to have a separate budget, so nobody cuts the food budget because they cut the education budget.

Health care again should not depend upon how much money your parents made, we cover the healthcare of the elderly, just put all kids in Medicare until age 18.

Will this cost money? Yes. but it solves the problem we created by trying to save money in the wrong areas.

Comment gotta catch 'em all (Score 1, Insightful) 67

France says it plans to move some government computers from Windows to Linux as part of a broader push for digital sovereignty and reduced dependence on U.S. technology. TechCrunch reports:
In a statement, French minister David Amiel said (translated) that the effort was to "regain control of our digital destiny"

He forgot the word "partial"

If they want that control they need to at least divest from ALL use of Microsoft "solutions" and possibly also build their own Linux distribution.

Comment Re:Absolutely needless (Score 1) 90

There's something to be said that both parties are the same in that they will both go play world police sometimes but for Republicans that means being the piece of shit corrupt cop.

If you've got one bad cop and one "good" cop enabling him, you've got two bad cops. Both parties always vote for more funding for war, which is how this was even possible in the first place.

Slashdot Top Deals

Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself.

Working...