I got that, after perusing TFS. But it's still a good reason to drop the dual usage. It's use in confusing situations should be sanctioned.

Hyundai announces licensing deal with Hasbro and Takara Tomy ... :-)

"Except, of course, for the front part, which was weirdly aerodynamic"

The command module is common to several other craft.

" (nowhere to keep fuel, for example)"

In the corners between the rear engines (4 engines in a diamond pattern) there are spherical tanks.

" good visibility of the ground "

Except you can't see the ground anyway since the nose extends several times further than the depth of the cockpit and the base of the forward windows is at or above eye level.

"giving the connector that level of admin permissions"

An exploit would not require *being given* that level or permissions but rather *obtaining* that level of permissions, i.e. chaining exploits. If Google can prove that it is not possible that there will ever be an exploit that would give that level of permission which could then be chained then Google would be justified at calling it just a misconfiguration. (Google cannot prove that.)

Even then, I would say it's a design flaw if you allow a configuration that one one would actually want.

I think Google search has a boolean to exclude truths that run counter to your world view.

"Wisdom alone comes through suffering." -- Aeschylus

Sounds like they're getting ready to (continue to) harm children.

The door of some church in Wittenburg doesn't curate your theses. Nor does it algorithmically select which ones to offer you.

These activities alone should disqualify a site from Section 230 protections.

Friend of mine had a son who started nagging for stuff. She asked for advice. I suggested leaving a couple of brochures for military acadamies lying around. Worked like a charm.

Meta is just a front for NABMLA.

I hate the headline, which is crediting Relativity Space to Eric Schmidt.

Eric Schmidt did not found the company, nor did he contribute to the technology, He was just the billionaire who stepped in with funding. Tim Ellis and Jordan Noone should be credited with founding the company and developing the technology.

But we Americans treat billionaires as superhuman rock stars; we don't care who does the actual innovation, we just let the billionaires take credit (and, yes, that applies to Elon Musk as well. From the press, you'd think he's the only person who invented anything or built anything or does anything at Tesla or SpaceX.)

In the United States, it is taxed as property. Also can't currency be taxed in most countries in the case of forex trading?

Ah, now you're nit-picking wording to pretend that you don't know what the word socialism means.

Bye

I'm hoping that some of these unwashed masses voting for this thing are employees of Google, Apple, etc. And I want to be a fly on the wall when the boss says, "Pack up your stuff. The company is moving to Wyoming."