The main safety issue with plug-in solar is that the solar panel must not feed power to the grid if there's an electrical outage. This is because repair crews for the utility company need to be sure that there isn't power coming in from the user side when they're repairing the producer side.

The Utah bill referenced (https://le.utah.gov/~2025/bills/static/HB0340.html) includes that explicitly:
(2)A portable solar generation device shall include a device or feature that prevents the system from energizing the building's electrical system during a power outage.

So, I'd think that as long as that is built into the system, and assuming it passes UL standards for consumer safety, I think the safety issue should not be a problem.

...but no guarantees.

No minus sign in front of the productivity change.

three and a bit = 011 + 001 = 100.
Four.

I notice your reply has no information content whatsoever.

That is, of course, accurate. Nuclear power is a low carbon-dioxide emission energy source, but it is literally not renewable (since it mines uranium for fuel, and uranium does not renew itself.)

In principle, it could be hundreds or even thousands of years before the supply of uranium is a problem, if we used the uranium efficiently, but with today's reactors, with no fuel reprocessing and no breeder reactors, if we used nuclear for all the electrical generation in the world, we would run out in a few decades.

That's the tl;dr summary of the summary, yes.

Totally, painfully right. As of today, yes, fossil fuels still dominate energy consumption in sectors such as transport.

Maybe. That's speculation about the future. The comment you're replying to is the present-day reality.

Manufacture of synfuels is an energy-intensive process (and typically the carbon source is from fossil-fuel sources such as coal...but, the good news is, coal is not sourced from Russia). Not clear if it will ever be commercially viable, or ever be carbon-neutral.

I'd place my money on electric vehicles to reduce oil requirements, not synfuels.

Wait-- you have personally observed cases of people engaged in a folie au deux fed by an AI agent?

The AI large-language model doesn't know that the real world exists. It doesn't know that fiction is different from reality, because it doesn't actually know about reality.

It put together a large fictional world, in which fictional things happen to characters that did not, actually, turn out to be fictional.

Since the employee was not identified, this looks like correct use of the English pronoun "they", which is the grammatically correct usage when the identity of the person is unknown.
"Someone left their wallet at the checkout."

Do you know that? It's a Hollywood cliche, sure, but there are nine countries with nuclear weapons on the planet, and they don't disclose their safety protocols.

DNA testing is a statistical test. There is always the possibility of a false positive.

Corrrecting the headline:
'Interim' CTO Announces Intent to Eradicate Fujitsu and Horizon From the UK's Post Office, marking the third time this was attempted over the last 16 years. The last two times they tried they ended up going back to the software.

You do know that the DOGE cuts didn't even look at what the cut employees did or whether they "added value." The cuts were done with a chainsaw,
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/1...