Why do we care about reviews from the Defense Planning Guidance committee?

Not sure where you get your information, but no, Reagan did absolutely nothing to increase the use of nuclear power. The opposite, in fact. No new construction permits for nuclear power plants were approved in the twelve years of the Reagan and Bush administrations.

He may have talked positive about nuclear power, but what he actually did was: nothing.

I don't follow the philosophy of "when there are several possible interpretations, go for the interpretation that makes them look good."

Basically, showing that the fossil-fuel giants are running the show.

But we already knew that.

So, you just told me they can't win. Trump tells them we need to sell stuff to foreigners, and when they are successful in doing that, you say they are "underserving US citizens."

You're just a mass of contradictions.

Yes: according to you, the one that's most successful.

About all I can say is to repeat that just because you're unable to see it doesn't mean that they're not anti-science.

For everything else Trump is saying "we need foreigners to buy more of our stuff with hard currency!" For Harvard, he is saying "foreigners are buying too much from you with hard currency!"

A fascinating study indeed, but unfortunately the results were inconclusive, since the control group (unvaccinated) was not identical to the experiment group (vaccinated).

A study needs to randomly select who is in the control group and who is in the experiment group. This needs to be drilled into anybody putting together a study. You can't have people self-select whether they are experiment or control.

Or both have a common cause.

And in fact the article pointed out this out:
"It’s also important to note that the studies included in the analysis were observational, meaning that the data can only show an association between eating habits and disease –– not prove that what people ate caused the disease. They also relied on people recalling their dietary patterns, which can leave room for misremembering or misreporting, said Dr. Gunter Kuhnle, professor of nutrition and food science at the University of Reading in the United Kingdom. He was not involved in the study. "

What control group was used in this study?

Some. But the summary ignores this sentence from the actual paper's abstract (which is a meta study, not new data):
"These associations each received two-star ratings reflecting weak relationships or inconsistent input evidence, highlighting both the need for further research and—given the high burden of these chronic diseases—the merit of continuing to recommend limiting consumption of these foods."

To its credit, the actual paper also makes a point that this is a correlation, not showing causation.

There was a bipartisan immigration reform bill hammered out between Republican and Democratic Senators in 2024 and brought to the Senate for approval, the "Border Act of 2024."

After it was brought to the floor, it was opposed by Donald Trump (who at the time held no political office), because he didn't want immigration reform because he wanted to make it an issue in his campaign.

Does your car have a cooling system? How does it keep the coolant fluid from freezing?

--
(EV owners: move on to next question)