Comment Re:AI was going to hit them like a brick (Score 4, Interesting) 27
They ingested some public domain photos and then went after people who used them, including the girl who released her photos as public domain. She lost her case because she had given up her license (long ago, before the days of the Creative Commons, which may have helped her). Getty should NOT have gone after people who used public domain photos, but a lawyer I talked to said Getty did add value in some ways by adding tags and search. There was some talk of adding license information to each asset so the enforcement teams wouldn't go after stuff that was imported from the public domain, but I don't know if that was ever implemented. (disclosure: former Getty contractor)