I don't think he's "afraid" of gay people, he thought there was a moral issue with gays getting married. Now that we've seen the result of "surrogacy" (baby purchasing; essentially human trafficking) I've revised a lot of my own views and wonder if perhaps we've gone too far.

I pray one day people like you understand the world is very complex and that morals that have existed for hundreds or thousands of years tend to have evolved for a reason.

I have my doubts. At least it should be easier to detect this time. Still I'm sure some people will believe no matter what.

People keep repeating this bullshit. Eich really knew what he was doing, and was pushing ahead with tab and process isolation. He started the projects that eventually brought in massive performance gains after he left. People keep dragging his name through the mud.

Eich did nothing wrong, well except for one thing. I pray one day Eich realizes his mistake, and apologizes to the word for inventing JavaScript.

You could use Librewolf and get the best of both worlds

Then let the kids fail every quiz and learn to do the work on their own when they're forced to retake the class. Professors should make a big deal about if they AI the homework, they probably won't pass the tests. The real math majors probably won't use AI at all because the subject and challenge interests them; it's the education, cs, other majors that will try to skip it.

Personally, I did horrible in math in undergrad; so bad I had to retake Linear Algebra in grad school (undergrad version) and make a B or higher to continue grad school (did not affect GPA). So this time, whenever I learned a new thing, I added it to a Matrix library I was writing first, THEN I did the homework. Figuring out how to do it programmatically made a massive difference! I made As and Bs on every quiz and test thanks to that method.

I don't think we really teach math correctly in school, and AI will just make it worse.

God it's unreadable. I've seen good AI responses sometimes, but you are on a fucking public forum. Thanks for saying you used AI, but why not just ... write your own damn argument? You can ask the AI sure, then write a response based on what it says .. ignore the parts you think are dumb, enhance/steelman the points you think are good.

What is writing? We write things down to communicate to others AND ORGANIZE OUR THOUGHTS. The fact that most humans can read/write their own language in the western world is VERY RECENT. Go back two thousand years or so and literacy rates were somewhere between 2%~5% is a lot of the world (I've looked up a bunch of stuff on this and no one can agree on a number. I think it might actually be closer to 10%, with just a lot of writing not surviving since paper disintegrates and wax tablets melt). And by the 1600s, a majority of people in the colonies could go to their local church and read a bible.

Writing your own words is a form of thinking and organization and it's a critical human skill people need to stop outsourcing to the predictive text generator.

I answered elsewhere in the thread. That one woman who sued because Getty went after people who used her public domain photos: Getty shouldn't have gone after them (they could have refused and won) but the lawyer mentioned that Getty also added value by adding tags and search functionality to find those photos. At the same time, the original photographer gave up her rights (I think in the 60s?) by making the photos public domain, so she didn't really have a claim for losses, even though she was just trying to protect people who were being contacted by Getty for using her public domain work.

There needed to be flags on the assets indicating they were public domain so enforcers could just ignore those, but I'm not sure if that idea ever got implemented.

They ingested some public domain photos and then went after people who used them, including the girl who released her photos as public domain. She lost her case because she had given up her license (long ago, before the days of the Creative Commons, which may have helped her). Getty should NOT have gone after people who used public domain photos, but a lawyer I talked to said Getty did add value in some ways by adding tags and search. There was some talk of adding license information to each asset so the enforcement teams wouldn't go after stuff that was imported from the public domain, but I don't know if that was ever implemented. (disclosure: former Getty contractor)

I worked for GettyImages for a year and a half on their asset management team doing Scala development in Seattle. It was honestly one of the most technologically advanced teams and companies I had ever worked with. If they decided to move from platform x to y, it would be done in 3 months, where other shops would take three years. All our services had full unit tests. We confidently pushed out releases and breakage/outages were rare. The platform team was 11 people and they were all amazing; able to roll out incredibly well designed changes in weeks long before the LLM era.

There was still tech debt in the company (I was tasked with fixing someone's shitty 1,000 line Perl script because there was a whiny little bitch on another team who refused to point to our new thumbnail server cluster which did everything their shitty script did, but in real time). But overall, the tech debt was far lower than any other place. We had a Principal Engineer who gave up a job at NASA to work at Getty.

I did have trouble with some of their copyright trolling issues, but even the lawyers I talked to there had some interesting arguments for various court cases I brought up, which really made me think.

Kinda sad they're at this point. Technologically, they were very far ahead, and I learned a lot while I worked there.

I'm blame the millions fucking retards that will buy this thing unironically who are actively making things worse for the 1%~2% of us that de-google our phones, self-host as much as possible and don't have big social networking accounts.

At some point we won't be able to say "I won't participate." My current company didn't understand why I couldn't use Microsoft Authenticator. I had to send them the screen shot of it crashing with a message about how Google Services were required. It's like owning a stick shift (no family member will ask to borrow your truck because they literally can't drive it). I have a viable excuse to not install company shit on my person devices without being an asshole about it. At the same time, I've seen an increasing number of job applications that require a LinkedIn profile URL! I thought about deleting LinkedIn years ago when I deleted FB/Twitter/Insta, but I would have trouble applying for jobs today if I did.

A time is soon coming where it will be impossible for someone seeking a Wal-mart or fast food job to even apply for it without owning a smartphone.

If that's a Jonestown reference, you should do some research on that. Jim Jones was deeply connected to the CIA, including doctors that were a part of the MK Ultra program. It's very likely that no one "Drank the Koolaid." I think once that Congressman discovered what was really going on, the intelligence operatives just shot everyone and claimed they committed mass suicide. The aid to that congressman who survived had this statement:

https://www.cia.gov/readingroo...

> Except it sure looks like about an order of magnitude more Rs have been there than Ds

Bill Clinton was a Republican? I feel like you missed the whole point: THERE ARE NOT TWO PARTIES! It's the same play and the same script. You missed the whole damn point dude. Both of them are NOT YOUR SPORTS TEAM! You failed the test.

This seems like complete and total bullshit; a story pushed for you valuation. I don't believe anything coming out of that lying scumbag organization.

and they're still both bad. ORANGE PEDO BAD or BLUE PEDO GOOD is so old and fucked up by now. The divide is intentional by the script writers for both parties. They both have the same strings, or similar enough strings, that the differences are marginal - often trivial and intentional. The most radical political stance to have as an American today is to reject both parties. They've all been to the Island.

The dependence on "AI" is the danger because it's incredibly stupid, and officers are not very smart. They need solid foundational training to favors innocence. They do get a lot of that, and it's almost always bad laws that lead to these situations (including the entire war on drugs).

Flock is a big problem here because it is clearly violating the 4th amendment. You can say "they're in public" and sure .. that's true. But when you start doing deep analytics automatically on everyone in "public," it's more than just a CCTV to keep a record or someone taking a photo of people walking through the park. It becomes indexed and searchable: surveillance. That's illegal search, which in this case lead to illegal search and seizure.

Gun sale records are not allowed to be indexed and searchable by name (they can be by a gun store. But if they go out of business and send an Excel spreadsheet in to the ATF, it has to be printed out and stored on paper or microfilm).

I hope this woman gets at least a million after taxes and legal fees for this fuck up. I hope the woman from TN gets a few million for her six months of detention in North Dakota. TN should have never remanded her. Both states failed to protect the people in that case. She lost her fucking house!