Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:A bank account freeze is not freedom of express (Score 1) 89

Completely, 100%, absolutely false.

The bank accounts of some of the criminal convoy leaders were frozen. The bank accounts of individuals who donated to the criminal convoy were not touched whatsoever. The money in the frozen donation accounts was eventually returned to those who donated.

Comment Re:Both are a problem (Score 1, Informative) 89

Canada guarantees Freedom of Expression in our Constitution. While on paper, the USA has stronger guarantees, in practice, Canada has much more freedom (as measured, for example, by Freedom House.)

We don't have the equivalent of the FCC threatening broadcasters for which politicians they interview on TV, for example. We don't have governments dictating to librarians which books they are or are not allowed to stock. And we don't have governments banning universities from teaching certain subjects. You know... basic freedoms that you Americans used to take for granted?

Comment poor babies (Score 1) 89

employees working "in the field" must "prioritize their safety" and "may contact law enforcement when they believe they are being threatened, harassed, followed, or otherwise face a safety concern."

They are a safety concern. They are creating an opportunity for a foreign adversary. Does anyone really believe these clowns are capable of maintaining security?

Comment Re:I used to think that AI doesn't use much energy (Score 2) 129

Yes, no man is an island, but I was not speaking in a philosophical sense.

Nor was I.

Can't rely on others to understand context either apparently.

You can't even figure out that the context is reality, where nothing about your car is independent except your departure time. Literally everything else about it is collaborative from cradle to grave.

Comment Re: Kimmel Doesn't Want to give Republicans a Pla (Score 1) 267

In fact Kimmel repeatedly invited Paxton on to the show.

Actually he invited Paxton to a non-boradcast interview like Talarico's.

So to you fairness is when Paxton gets MORE than Tallarico?

Where FCC fairness rules would not apply

The FCC fairness rule you're talking about? Where they both would get an interview? This is both of them getting an interview even where it's not required, so it's above and beyond the requirement you keep crying isn't being met. This isn't only meeting the requirement, it's going beyond that. Cry harder.

and where Kimmel can be as partisan as he wishes to be.

There is no requirement that Kimmel not be partisan on his entertainment show. You're making shit up again because you wouldn't know a fact from any distance.

Do you actually think you're intelligent? Or is this all just LLM-generated trolling on behalf of a cadre of child rapists?

Comment Re:except they do not (Score 1) 109

No reasonable person thinks that the word hate in this context means the same thing as the definition to which you are trying to recast it.

No reasonable person would use the word hate where it cannot possibly apply. They would find some other way to discuss the thing which actually made sense because it took into account the definitions of words.

Slashdot Top Deals

Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall

Working...