Comment Re:Silicon Carbide is a good target (Score 1) 25
Thanks for tracking that down. To me that's the real news here. Reactor vessels are not the only application for this technology.
Thanks for tracking that down. To me that's the real news here. Reactor vessels are not the only application for this technology.
In my exerience, the share of programmers that (a) understand that shell is a programming language and not some weird command prompt
It's a dessert topping and a floor wax. This was an unusual feature of UNIX, but since then it's become the norm, albeit with everyone else inheriting it from there. You can write MS-DOS scripts with complex independent logic, you just don't want to.
and (b) take the time and invest the effort required to learn it properly is surprisingly small.
I don't know that I've learned it "properly" to this day, but I can thank The UNIX Programming Environment for making me basically capable. (I believe that my paper copy is a later edition than this...)
Silicon Carbide is difficult to work with due to the high temperatures required, so if they have a 3d printing process that is effective at producing the kind of quality needed for a reactor vessel, that's what's really interesting here. Or... whose tech are they using?
The reason is Ed Zitron has been making the rounds of business media lately pointing out that their (OpenAI, Anthropic) accounting doesn't add up at all. It's very enlightening to business types, who don't really understand our technical discussions about the mathematical limitations of LLMs, but understand very well when "profitability" is an accounting trick, and when sufficiently large markets simply don't exist for the implied returns from stratospheric valuations. The Emperor's New Clothes And All That.
The latest domino is Meta/Facebook who, like ElonCo, have announced that they have no use for all the GPUs that they bought previously, and are hoping to rent them out to customers instead.
Presumably, these customers will be able to do the kind of "Great Things"(TM) which the AI scientists on staff at Meta aren't able to do themselves. I'm talking about those AI scientists that Meta hired for $100m with great fanfare last year.
Personally, I'm looking forward to seeing World Hunger and Cancer solved in the third quarter this year by Meta's customers accessing NVDA chippies at a fraction of the price that Elon intends to charge, or failing that finding a way out of the continuing Hormuz Crisis by asking Google Gemini to make a plan and emailing it to the White House.
your argument is that your team are better at lying?
It's not a lie. The unemployment rate is crap. Both parties like to use it to lie about how good things are when they are in charge, which is why most of them don't want to kill that goose.
You may note that I never claimed it was perfect.
It's destroying the planet. Sustainability is job #1. SMH here.
The "you're stupid" above is indeed a mild ad hominem and could have been rephrased.
No, it literally is not an ad hominem in absolutely any sense whatsoever, period. If you think otherwise, you may or may not be stupid, but you're definitely ignorant. I could have phrased it some other way, if I were trying to be dishonest, but that is not what I do. I'm not here to be nice about shit ideas which ennoble or enrich shit people, nor to coddle their enablers.
Ad hominem means insult from a person. It is an argument that an argument is false because a certain person made it. It literally does not matter whether an insult is involved, although it can be. The fact that you're issued moderation points for a site like Slashdot when you're so eager to be so fundamentally wrong about what something means is utterly pathetic. This is exactly why moderation should be public, so people can know whether it means anything, or it was executed by someone who has no fucking idea what they're on about. This is also why moderation is and always has been fundamentally broken on Slashdot. Posting and moderating in the same discussion isn't allowed, but the people who are most qualified to moderate are also the people who are most qualified to comment.
I also note that you failed to understand the part about comments whose sole purpose is to insult and enrage, with your comical focus on insult when that is not even the core of what ad hominem even is. It's especially amusing that you quoted that section in light of your inability to understand either thing.
Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time.
Heat dissipates passively in the form of infrared energy, space or not, it happens regardless. [...] And because you're obviously confused enough to have such a dumb take
lolololol etc ad infinitum.
curious.
it is my ignorance.
what other businesses do this
Ah, ad hominem attacks, the sure sign of someone who has a really strong argument.
You don't even know what an ad hominem attack is, since I didn't make one.
Learn what words mean before you use them, kid.
SpaceX showed investors an early prototype of a slim, "handset-like" AI device
I guarantee it was an off the shelf device running their app. It's the elon phone!
All the Elon haters
If you don't hate Elon after what he did to USAID, which has killed thousands abroad elsewhere and also resulted in the screwworm showing up here, you're stupid.
You're going to look at what are the most practical workloads for space AI, what are the most efficient chips for those workloads in terms of tokens per Watt.
Fine words from someone who has done neither.
And so on and so forth - it's called engineering.
What you're doing is called simping.
Democratic-Capitalism. It takes the greediest and most dishonest and forces them to keep each other in check
Not just history but the present is replete with counterexamples. Cartels abound.
"Thank heaven for startups; without them we'd never have any advances." -- Seymour Cray