Comment Re:Two things both true (Score 1) 207
Ok, you doubled down... but you didn't actually say anything.
Lie. I've made an explicit point ever since my first post which you've refused to even engage with in bad faith.
Why are you saying it is a "lie" that Sanger was violating the canvassing rule? Everybody agrees he was, and he doesn't deny it. He simply makes procedural arguments for why he shouldn't be called out for it.
Double down. Saying "More people should become wikipedia editors" is not canvassing. It doesn't matter if a bigoted lynch mob lies and says it is, it isn't. Truth is not a popularity contest. "Canvassing" in wikipedia terms would be Sanger explicitly soliciting people to join the website and vote in a specific way. This is why even his fellow co-founder jimbo wales explicitly called out this vote as utter horseshit.
I've made this point consistently from the start, you keep lying about what happened, lying about what I said, and doubling down on your lies every reply.
You're a typical right-winger. The only time you shout "lie" is when you're telling them.
Projection.
Comment Re:Volvo but not Polestar? (Score 2) 113
Also, $70K is the median *household* income. The median individual income in Omaha is $41.6K. As gtall said, factor in taxes, healthcare, rent etc... then factor an extra $500-$1000 to register and title your new car, another $1000 annually for vehicle maintenance (except it'll be more than that because for $20K you're buying a used car), and factor in whatever you're spending on gas...
Submission + - Feds Want to Drop Requirement for Autonomous Cars to Have a Brake Pedal (caranddriver.com)
Braking distance regulations would stick around, but the physical pedals would no longer be required for cars designed to be exclusively autonomous.
I would want any autonomous car to have emergency brake and/or shutoff.
Comment Re:Made up numbers (Score 1) 229
There are far too many variables to do that successfully, and in any event you never know about the road not taken. Which is why I say no one can never tell you you were wrong.
Comment Re:Made up numbers (Score 1) 229
No True Scotsman fallacy.
Comment Lawsuit fodder (Score 1) 93
This is great fodder for lawsuits around competition / anticompetitive business practices, and consumer protection lawsuits.
On their face, individual agreements that lock in prices as a voluntary agreement are enforceable. However, an awful lot of laws kick in when they are more than an individual contract and from the story they're hitting 16 of the biggest ones, and therefore a lot of the market.
Depending on the market such as the country or the state, there are potentially enormous penalties that can be applied. For some laws, the fines can be 2x the gains. If these account for 40% of the company's revenue, the massive fines would mean 80% of their revenue for as long as the profiteering was on the books. In the short term while they grind through the courts they'll look like a windfall, in the long term when court rulings come down they'll look like bankruptcy, as potentially years of revenue get charged to massive fines.
Comment Re:Typical (Score 1) 113
Comment Re:Cool! (Score 1) 113
Next do Ford, GM, and Tesla.
This is not limited to US-based manufacturers. Toyota and Subaru also does this and AFAIK they are Japanese companies. KIA and Hyundai does this and they are Korean.
Comment Re:The best outcome... (Score 1) 113
Comment Charging for it? (Score 1) 1
Comment Good requirement (Score 1) 107
Comment Re:Pony up (Score 1) 204
Bolt has telematics collection via OnStar that is very involved to disable. While Bolt is cheap, it is like most modern EVs is not repairable outside of dealerships. So Bolt is F on privacy and C- on repairability.
Comment Re:Two things both true (Score 1) 207
He doesn't even deny it, he just makes procedural arguments why he shouldn't be punished for it.
Lie
And you're either not smart enough to understand the words, or you're too much of a dingus to stick to actual arguments instead of yelling, "Squirrel!"
Double down
(The canvassing rule doesn't say that people involved in activism can't be editors. It says that people who are editors can't use activism to gain support for their edits.)
Project. In the exact way you claimed Sanger was doing in your initial lie.Literally all Sanger did was encourage more people to become wikipedia editors in general. Even Wales called out the pernicious lie that Sanger was "canvassing".
Comment Re:Just to clarify one point (Score 1) 207
Slashdot at the link. I know because they're the ones out in the streets literally screaming about loving Hitler. If you want a cesspool go check out bluesky.