And once you boot one of such kernels in Secure Boot mode, you can't insert unsigned modules, kexec unsigned kernels or access (even as root) a number of facilities that could let you gain control over your own machine.
Number of people who give a crap about that: you.
People who are working because they WANT to work rather than NEED to work are way more productive and would produce much more GDP and a larger tax base to pay taxes.
All studies show that most people would continue to work even with a generous UBI.
How do you reconcile this unsupported-by-any-evidence "all studies" assertion with the live demo you have been seeing over the past several years of a massive rise in the SSI disability rolls? Are those people also part of the "most people" who will continue to work while being given free money? Or are they humans behaving like humans behave, unlike those in your "all studies"?
Nor does that assurance exist for any other such program with the exception of food stamps, and it would be exceptionally easy to have a portion of the money be flagged as "food only" where it can only be taken out at grocery stores similar to the way EBT works today.
That's funny. Google EBT fraud and get back to me. If you think EBT monies are used solely for food you are living in a fantasy land.
>We liberals haven't figured out a nice way to say you didn't build it, but you know what? You didn't.
Yeah because only poor people pay taxes. Corporations don't, and successful business people don't. (Or do I, by some chance, have that backward?) "It" was built by the taxes paid by people who actually made money. And the teeming millions who also pay taxes get to pay them because of the efforts and risktaking of entrepreneurs who employ them. Really it's not a difficult concept, and the reason "you liberals" can't figure out a nice way to claim otherwise is that otherwise is false.
If at first you don't succeed, you must be a programmer.