Not really clear on what that has to do with what I'm talking about, but thanks anyway.

"The rug is being pulled out from under these manufacturers," said Hannah Pitt, a director in Rhodium's energy and climate practice...

Oh please. Only the most stupid of manufacturers would have committed capital on the assumption that subsidies intended to jumpstart the industry would go on forever.

Better eat up my leftovers . . .

It's nice that you "think" that.

I guess it's easy, when something isn't true, to assign potential responses to people. But it's bogus.

Never would have guessed they would have decided it was climate change. My money was on them determining that the reason for this happening was excessive government spending and taxation.

Oh yeah Robert A. Heinlein, very woke. I get the feeling you don't actually know what the word means.

Just guessing, but I think he meant something about building one of the most valuable companies on Earth.

Who cares? This is not news that matters.

. . . film at 11.

Interesting to cite Buntgen in this article as if he has no criticisms of climate science, when he is in the recent issue of Nature saying this, among other things:

"In essence, I suggest that an ever-growing commingling of climate science, climate activism, climate communication and climate policy, whereby scientific insights are adopted to promote pre-determined positions, not only creates confusion among politicians, stakeholders and the wider public, but also diminishes academic credibility."

https://www.nature.com/article...