Comment Re:with apologies to Yogi Berra (Score 1) 20
Nobody really likes to think about the cosmic horror that is the billionaire class and they are insatiable appetite for limitless wealth or how we are all mandated to keep feeding it.
I am very confident that millions people will not go along with it and that millions of others will, and the latter will all be at risk
Wouldn’t it be nice to see some trolling the other way: the Mail, GB News, Reform, the EDL, Tate, etc — all of them should be feasible to concern-troll under this legislation.
It’s picked right back up again. Sure, growth isn’t smooth, and there are phases of higher and lower growth, but the growth trajectory remains very clear outside NA
That is true but there's a difference between tv series and movies. Many actors never cross those worlds. Chris Hemsworth was very much an up and comer in the movie world when he entered as a superhero having done only minor supporting roles before then. Thor was his breakout role.
They've rebooted FF after only one movie, what, like four times?
If you're not paying attention then sure. The actual number is they've rebooted after one movie once.
The 1994 was unreleased.
The 2005 movie had a sequel.
The 2015 movie - is the one that only survived one so far.
And now we're here.
How many times have the rebooted Superman lately?
Lately? Zero times. The last reboot was in 2013 with Man of Steel. The most recent superman film is not an origin story.
Nope, it's a tiny handful. All the superhero movies combined over the last decade make up 0.1% of movies released over that time in the USA alone. There's 2 superhero movies on right now. Whoop de fucking do. At my local cinema this one actually kicked Superman out of the prime screen. We have 15 screens at my local cinema pretty much playing something constantly. You don't need to go into Cinema 9 to see Fantastic Four. You could go to see the thriller playing in Cinema 12, or the Comdey in Cinema 5, or see any one of the 20 other films that are currently listed as playing at the cinema.
It hasn't been slim pickings at all. There's hundreds of films out there released constantly, yet you seem to know only of the one which you (a nerd, let's face it you're here on Slashdot) gets targeted advertisement for
Seriously turn off the TV, turn off your PC, and go out see a movie. There's plenty for you, not slim pickings in the slightest. Heck if you get really stuck stay at home and fire up Disney+. They conveniently put all their super hero films in one category which allows you to skip over it and what the literal countless hours of content that would suit you instead. You want action? Go seek out action. A new action movie staring Charlese Theron was released only 2 weeks ago, can you even name it? I'm guessing no, since you're too busy looking up stories on superhero movies to complain on.
Stop blaming people who release things for your inability to go look at the things you want.
Yet the world found out about it somehow... So clearly he thought it was special enough to post about.
Not really. Lots of people put videos / blog posts of the work they do online. His entire youtube channel is full of posts of him just fucking around. I doubt he thinks its special.
Exactly this. I am absolutely certain that lots of people in the UK are now going to have their details stolen and abused, and the harms will be compounded by the embarrassment of having to admit that it was for the purposes of watching porn. I mean, sharing passport details with some dodgy porn website based overseas is the exact opposite of Online Safety, but you'll get scant sympathy from politicians, you may end up having a very difficult conversation with your partner, and you will never get the press on your side with a DailyMailSadFace article bc there's wanking involved.
The Online Safety Act is much broader, for sure, and catches a lot more types of material. But I'm sure the proponents are pleased that the most memorable thing that's caught is something that people are often embarrassed to admit using.
1. That wasn't what the OP was referring to
2. That wasn't monitoring social media, it was acting on reports from the public
3. That wasn't about "challenging the government narrative", it was about breaching public health rules in the same way that curling one out on the pavement will get you in trouble
What the OP was referring to was this news report. I don't think this is confirmed yet, however.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/art....
"An elite police unit is being set up to monitor social media posts for anti-migrant material as part of efforts to prevent possible riots, according to The Sunday Telegraph. It says details of the National Internet Intelligence Investigations team emerged in a letter to MPs from policing minister Dame Diana Johnson. But the plan been criticised by opposition politicians and free speech campaigners - with Big Brother Watch telling the paper that resources should be put into physical policing rather than what it calls 'Orwellian units.' "
We have guy that's nominally a king but lacks most kingly powers. You have a guy that's nominally a president and not a king, but is being given free rei(g)n to act as a king with literal sanctioned impunity by your Supreme Court. Our government has more effective checks on its power than yours does.
Factorials were someone's attempt to make math LOOK exciting.