Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - Jellyfish knock out French nuclear plant (latimes.com)

Bruce66423 writes: 'A “massive influx” of jellyfish has forced Electricite de France to shut three units at its Gravelines nuclear power plant and reduce output at a fourth, curbing power supply at a time when extremely hot weather is boosting demand. That’s taken some 3.2 gigawatts of capacity offline.

'Last year, it faced similar problems when swarms of jellyfish clogged up filter drums.'

The SF plot line question is: what did it do to upset the jellyfish? The more prosaic one is to ask why they didn't do something about the jellyfish after last year's problem?

Submission + - Ukrainian's claim Ubiquiti Supplying Russia's 'Human Safari' Drone Kill Zone (aol.com)

AmiMoJo writes: DiCello Levitt LLP today filed a human rights lawsuit against Ubiquiti Inc., alleging the New York-based technology company helped power the battlefield communications network Russia uses to hunt, target, and kill Ukrainian civilians with drones.

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the lawsuit is brought by Ukrainian civilians and family members of civilians killed or injured in Russian drone and drone-assisted attacks. It alleges that Ubiquiti's long-range wireless radio bridge antennas and airMAX technology became critical infrastructure in Russia's command-and-control network — connecting drone pilots, reconnaissance feeds, commanders, and attack units in real time across a roughly 100-kilometer "kill zone" that Russian operators have turned into a "human safari."

Comment Re:yeah (Score 1) 183

This is why I've abandoned Reddit (for the second time), almost exactly the day after my first Cake Day with the new account. I appealed the second one-week ban and it surprisingly got overturned, but I decided I was still done with them. In my particular case, it was a comment on the video of the incident at a Cubs game where a middle-aged to elderly veteran slapped someone in the head for not standing up for the national anthem. All I said was "that guy better watch his knees, that's where I'd be targeting if he had slapped *me*." Yeah, advocating anything other than curling up in a ball and accepting damage is seen as "promoting harm". Fuck that.

Submission + - This 'adversarial' pattern can prevent surveillance cameras from detecting you (techcrunch.com)

ZipNada writes: Bill Swearingen has spent the past year running largely the same test, over and over again. The goal was to produce a computer-generated pattern that could block the surveillance cameras lining America’s streets from detecting it.

Some 31 million tests later, Swearingen says he can now produce patterns on-demand that, when applied to clothing and objects, prevent some of the most commonly deployed license plate readers and surveillance cameras from detecting whatever the pattern covers, from people to vehicles.

His project, which he calls noRecognition, allows people to escape the automatic detection and algorithmic surveillance used across the U.S. and beyond.

Comment Re:Local AI (Score 2) 39

There are multiple good reasons to run local AI. Guard rails may be the most obvious, but perhaps not the most important. Other reasons include not putting your prompts in the cloud for glowies to collect, not having to deal with a model rugpull, never hitting usage limits (although they're replaced by the speed limit of your hardware), and being able to fine tune a model to not even have the guard rails in the first place. If you find something you love as much as some people loved ChatGPT 4o, you can run it forever and nobody can take away that access. You can talk about unethical schemes (as I frequently do, when writing fiction or worldbuilding an RPG campaign) and not worry about a knock on the door from a government official that thinks you *actually* want to dump ricin in the municipal water supply, or microwave your neighbor from the other side of the wall. Refusals are easier to work around in most cases than trying to anticipate cases where your efforts might be interpreted as something much more serious than they actually are.

Comment Re:Does this end them sooner, or is it irrelevant? (Score 1) 38

There seem to be some critical complexity thresholds that must be met to achieve various types of emergent complexity. Just looking at Gemma 4 alone, going from E2B to E4B to 12B just seems to get confused a bit less and know a bit more. Then somehow, going to 26B-A4B gains a very clear ability to hold more complex associations and concepts in mind. 31B is better still, and enough so that I almost want to classify 26B-A4B with the toy models (E2B, E4B, 12B), but letting 26B-A4B do a lot of reasoning seems to help considerably. 26BB-A4B with Medium reasoning effort competes with 31B using no reasoning at all. However, 31B with reasoning enabled just seems qualitatively different again. It's no longer just a stochastic parrot and a knowledge base, but it actually seems to be able to work through many problems with multiple steps, where the best 26B-A4B can do is recite what the steps of the solution are. Just like an engine, there is no substitute for displacement (or parameters in this case) but you can bolt on turbos and the like to get around *some* of the shortcomings of a smaller cylinder such that it becomes less obvious.

Slashdot Top Deals

Nearly every complex solution to a programming problem that I have looked at carefully has turned out to be wrong. -- Brent Welch

Working...