Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:What is socialism? (Score 1) 108

That's a bad problem: people like you make up their own definitions of the words

No, that's not a problem with me "making up" a meaning

It is a problem. You make up a meaning that has a definition that's bizarrely twisted to make your opinions written into the definition. As I said:

I would say that "doing some robbery, taking the ill gotten gains, and using those gains to bribe voters with inducements and largely debt-based goodies to get the incumbents reelected" is the definition of crony capitalism.

Comment Re:Justice delayed is justice denied (Score 1) 60

Then the court has to schedule the case in between all the other cases they're dealing with. The parties may be ready to go to trial on April 1st, but if the first available slot in the court's docket isn't until June 1st, guess when the trial starts.

Except this isn't a delay from April to June. This is a delay of well over a year, and maybe nearly two years.

Comment Re:What is socialism? (Score 2) 108

That's a bad problem: people like you make up their own definitions of the words, then make glib assertions based on the assumption that everybody else means the same thing, and as a result people talk right past each other.

Not just you. A lot of people--mostly Gen-X and younger-- these days think the word 'socialism' means "the government doing things that benefit the people instead of corporations". That's not what it means.

I'd say that "socializing" is pretty clearly meant to say that a centrally planned authority is doing some robbery, taking the ill gotten gains, and using those gains to bribe voters with inducements and largely debt-based goodies to get the incumbents reelected.

Yes, that's another bad problem: people like you making their own definitions of words so that their opinions are correct by definition.

I would say that "doing some robbery, taking the ill gotten gains, and using those gains to bribe voters with inducements and largely debt-based goodies to get the incumbents reelected" is the definition of crony capitalism.

Maybe that's polluting your precious fantasy of a worker utopia,

I have no fantasy of a worker utopia. I think that socialism had fatal flaws and doesn't work. But if we fail to use words that are understood with the same meaning, we can't even discuss the flaws. (Unrestricted capitalism also has flaws, which turn out to be well known to any actual economists (and is why real economic systems have restrictions). Believing that there are two and only two choices, and no other possible choices, is another bad problem.)

Comment Re:The Eagle (Score 2) 41

Let's look at the various aspects of the Eagle design.

1. It was "designed to work in space" so wasn't designed to be aerodynamic

Except, of course, for the front part, which was weirdly aerodynamic

2. It was modular

Easy to do when you have no fuel tanks.

3. Mass was kept to a minimum without compromising strength, which is precisely what you would want if your job is to carry a significant mass in space and be able to manoever without ripping apart

I have no idea how you calculated mass. But about a third of the vehicle (not including the detachable part) seems to be the landing pads, which doesn't seem very optimum.

There were terrible aspects as well (nowhere to keep fuel, for example),

Yes, the lack of fuel tanks is a real problem. Also, how do they fly? They only have engines in back, but they skim over the surface of the moon like they are levitating. What holds them up? When they blast off to go into deep space, do they rotate 90 degrees to point the main engines downward?

Comment Re:Model Kit Version? (Score 1) 41

I had kits for both an Eagle and a Hawk (which is somewhat surprising in retrospect given it only appeared in one or two episodes, IIRC). The Eagle model was a much more complex kit with far more parts than the Hawk, which was also somewhat smaller despite them both supposedly being to the same scale. Tbh, I always thought the Hawk was the cooler looking ship due to its more aggressive lines, which is probably why it was blessed with a model kit, but you can't argue with the sheer practicality & flexibility of the modular Eagle design. And its ability to survive so many crashes - usually at the hands of Alan Carter - of course!

There was also a range of diecast toys and plastic action figures for the series, I think.

Comment Re:Sojust like every other tech growth story (Score 1) 180

Most of the R&D in China is done with private money. The government does contribute, but it's more long term guarantees than it is cash.

In a democracy, policy can change ever 4-5 years. Look at the US, it's been alternating between pushing renewables to banning them to pushing them to banning them again, over the last 4 administrations. If you were a company developing renewable technology, would you have faith that your investment in R&D wouldn't be banned by the time it reaches market? Doesn't even have to be a ban, just an administration that is hostile to your business, and an electorate that would rather roll coal than see a wind turbine 20km off-shore.

The Chinese government said that EVs were the future and it would ensure that future came quickly and stuck around. It made sure the infrastructure was installed, and promoted them to consumers as a way to reduce pollution. Loans for development were made available. And it stuck to that for the long term, not just the next 4-5 years.

Democracy can do that too, but not in a two party system. Look at European democracies where coalition governments are the norm, where the system is designed to prevent any one party gaining complete power. Planning is longer term, and there is more certainty in future policy direction.

Comment Re:Sojust like every other tech growth story (Score 5, Interesting) 180

From Europe we look at Americans that way too. Long hours, ridiculously little holiday entitlement (I just booked flights for my six week break over the new year, and I've still got time off to spare), and a billionaire-Epstien ruling class who live in luxury. Only they also get pollution, mass deportations, bankrupted by healthcare costs, school shootings, and so on.

China is far from perfect, but it also doesn't compare that badly.

Comment Re:I just had to replace a phone for a family memb (Score 1) 44

The usual way of fixing it is to designate those products as critically important and put in a mandate for making them available. Take water, for example. Data centres need it, humans need it, farms need it. If it was just sold to the highest bidder we would be in trouble.

I'm hoping that Chinese manufacturers step up to increase supply, because they will be less concerned about demand drying up. They have both a rapidly expanding domestic market, and the longer term goal to out-compete rivals on price. CXMT is unfortunately allocating a lot of production to AI as well, but they aren't the only ones. Hopefully NAND flash production also ramps up very quickly.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Just the facts, Ma'am" -- Joe Friday

Working...