BBC is paywalled now. Welcome to the future.

There was always a select list of reasonable symbols that were allowed for.

Like the other idiot, you repeat "many eyes" but forgot the rest of the sentence and what it actually applies to.

In addition to not meaning the things you talk about, it also doesn't make you a sandwich.

If you only say, "Many Eyes" then you haven't established what the actual quote is. (And probably don't remember, assuming good faith. Although that's a poor assumption on slashdot, neckbeards making points they know are easily refuted is par here)

If you say the rest of the sentence, then you find out it doesn't apply to the problem in this case; only to the solution having been effective once implemented. (ie, the packages were found and removed)

Being able to find and fix a known bug (obviously) isn't a shield against new bugs.

This isn't surprising, but I know what the best offer they're likely to get is.

That sounds plausible, but is not what the article says. You only need read 2 paragraphs.
Righty now, Musk owns 42% of SpaceX. He could quit as CEO tomorrow, but stay on the board and still have 82% voting rights.
Once the 180 day lockout ends, Musk could start slowly selling shares in accordance with SEC Rule 144 Restrictions, the same as any insider.
Same as with Tesla.

Any shares "based on hitting certain performance objectives" are in addition, and would dilute the existing shares.

Damn straight. I think if I were a trillionaire I could hook up three even; 'cause chicks dig dudes with money.

Oh no you don't! He has been a naturalised American for over 40 years now, no backsies.

Great. New fab in the West. It's just power stuff; silicon carbide FET and whatnot. Still, if concern for "sovereignty" is what it takes for bedroom community Europe to get off the dime, then good for them. Better than being industrial vassals of the US, China and Russia, which is where they've been heading. Feel free to make more "sovereign" fabs.

Even the summary said the match was only 93% probable. That's a LONG way from any reasonable certainty. (Out of 1000 people you'd have 70 matches. If you don't do other steps of elimination, what is the size of the population you're screening?)

LOL

Perhaps not, but they are designed to *attempt* to only target the things they are aimed at.

I don't think that's a well defined term. Historically you can only figure out which actions were war crimes after one side has won, and decided to set up trials. The rest of the time different sides pick different actions.

No. They say "sinister".

Batteries are not a sufficient answer here. But when you add in a grid connection they work. The weather will be different in different places, so some places it will be windy, some places it will be rainy, and other places the sky will be clear. I think this works even in Britain, and that's North of Ontario.