Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Why not adopt? (Score 0) 20

Adopt? What part of the world do you live in where that is still possible in 2026? Even adopting from 3rd world nations is difficult now.
Non-family adoptions in Australia are down to 26 in 2024. I know one person who managed to adopt years ago, because he had the same medical condition as the baby. You don't apply for that - they find you. ... Googling I see "private adoption" is possible in the Land of the Free if you have enough money. Everything is for sale, eh?

You can try to foster a child, but you'll likely get an older and very broken one. And a mother claiming them back when they get off the drugs, or on the meds. I see the US is possibly different.

Comment Re:Boo hoo (Score 1) 53

turning words into a statistical map of word associations.

That's what you think AI is? You are very right to feel threatened by AI, but downplaying it like that comes across as immature. Like saying the invading army can't shoot straight, it won't help you.
  Words are mapped to semantic space in the embedding and de-embedding, but thats a very small part of the process.

Spot on with the IP analysis. Copyright, patents and trade secrets do not apply here. So the question raised is if new forms of IP law are needed or desirable in the age of AI. Right now, it would be hard to argue that the model distillation being done by Deepseek etc is causing harm, such as discouraging investment in AI research.
    The justification for copyright law is that it is needed to provide adequate funding to content creators. Will the day come when some new protection is needed for the creators of AI models? maybe. But right now, so much money is flowing, and the industry is changing so fast, it is hard to see how rushed new laws could do more good than harm.

Comment Re:Excuse me? (Score 3, Informative) 26

ASML's machine shoots a stream of molten droplets of tin through a chamber, where a massive carbon dioxide laser heats them into plasma. ... but there has to be a better way.

No, EUV lithography has to be impossible. That's what most people said, but some very persistent scientists eventually showed otherwise. It is the most amazing, most expensive non-military machine ever sold. It shoots each droplet 3 times, and 50,000 of them per second. Lithography needs a point source of light.
Here is a quote on the Zeiss mirrors it uses:

If you were to scale one of these mirrors (which are about the size of a dinner plate or slightly larger) to be the size of Germany, the largest surface imperfection—the tallest "mountain"—would be less than 1 millimeter high

Veritasium did a great video on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Comment Its time to end the stigma (Score 1) 89

Lister: "Look, Rimmer, death isn't the handicap it used to be in the olden days. It doesn't screw your career up like it used to."
Rimmer: "That's what they say, Lister. But if you had two people coming for a job, and one of them was dead, which one would you pick?"

The United Appeal for the Dead will be interested in this.

Comment Re:Not who you want in charge of road safety.. (Score 1) 75

It's pretty common to see a family of five on a motorbike there, no I am not joking.

The economic progress allowing ordinary Indians or Filipinos to buy motor scooters, and the limited carrying capacity has been a big driver of lower fertility rates.
Its really hard to fit six people on a 100cc Honda.

  A new trend I've noticed in Australia is seeing a family of four on an e-bike. They'd never do it on a motorcycle, but somehow a cargo e-bike is OK.

Comment Re:Liar (Score 0) 245

There is no way FSD will ever be a thing with just cameras.

And you're basing this assumption off what exactly?

We will have to wait and see whether or not vision-only will beat systems using Lidar etc in the real world of self-driving,
but given the precedent of humans, the GP is clearly a moron to say "no way".

Comment Re:Not only BMW (Score 1) 170

So it's not crazy to materially help Tesla by using their navigation service AND having to pay for the privilege? Shouldn't *they* be paying *me* for helping their training data?

Separate things. IIRC , you only pay for the live data connection, such as traffic. Training data is uploaded over wifi, and you can opt out.

Comment Re:Not only BMW (Score 1) 170

Tesla has been doing this as well. They buried navigation with traffic into the "premium connectivity" package for $10 a month along with music streaming.

This probably also explains why Tesla doesn't support Apple CarPlay,

Tesla want you using their navigation service so as to get better training data for self-driving. The $10 for internet connection is not crazy.

Of course, they also made "full" self driving a $99 a month subscription as well.

Yes, FSD is mostly software, so subscription is more acceptable than for hardware. But taking away the option of a one-time purchase price for FSD does feel like the beginning of enshitification.

Slashdot Top Deals

The wages of sin are high but you get your money's worth.

Working...