Comment rrriiiight... (Score 1) 17
And you clowns don't think that your OS is a fragile pile of crap if it's that easy to fuck up?
Seriously? Do you even know what the job of an OS _is_ ?
And you clowns don't think that your OS is a fragile pile of crap if it's that easy to fuck up?
Seriously? Do you even know what the job of an OS _is_ ?
You must be American, you think 100 years is a long time
A touchscreen doesn't negate that, either. Lack of physical controls does. They are not mutually exclusive. Oh, and my new vehicle also has a real dashboard with display in front of the driver, like a vehicle should have (unlike a Tesla). AND it ALSO has an HUD display with speed, speed limit, nav info, etc, as well. AND it has voice controls. So all options are on the table.
You are right. A screen that does not replace physical controls is a nice thing.
And I agree. Any vehicle that doesn't have a proper dashboard in front of me, where I need to look to the side to see important information, is a no-buy for me.
yes, it's a short list. But it's a start and a kind of "red line". I am hopeful they move that line to include other things that people use while driving all the time.
Are big screens nice? Sure, yes.
But if I have a choice between good physical controls and a big touch screen, I'll take the buttons and switches any day, thank you.
My 10 year old BMW has voice commands and a map that's always been more than enough for me. Sure, it's not as large, but while driving I don't want a big map - I want an indicator that tells me "next turn left in 500m" - and I have that, not on the main display but right in front of me on the dashboard. Newer models have it on a HUD.
Nothing in what you wrote makes a LARGE screen necessary.
They don't have to be better. They just have to be competing for the same ad money and users.
If this persists China will simply build more fabs, and more quickly than anyone else. So what if it's old-ish tech, at least they will have it.
That was a failure, but the first failure was not recognizing it wasn't ready for a research project either. When they realized it was going to have to be heavy and bulky, they should have stopped and either iterated the design again, or smarter IMO, waited for tech to improve (or push it) and then done another design. OTOH Apple can afford to lose the money...
Glad to hear they are still kicking. I hear there's also some Linux-based stuff now but I haven't seen it yet, I'm afraid I'm not much in the market for new cars.
1-800-69-SOROS
What code they are based on is irrelevant. Slashdot still has a very simple interface (I am using it right now, it is still the best interface) which is easy for bots to interface to using the DOM. Whether it's Perl or C# or Ada underneath makes no difference.
The real question, therefore, is why are we still being subjected to this cowardly anonymous bullcrap? This management has turned off AC posting before, and you could say they turned it back on only because post counts tanked, but have you seen post counts recently? It's now horribly rare to break 100.
Slashdot needs a major overhaul, and I don't mean of the code though that will of course have to change. I mean specifically that mod abuse and AC trolling are driving away every serious poster. My thanks to those of you who still remain, but most of you post less and less, not that I blame you. I presume you're here less, too.
He tricked them into doing it, if anything that will work against him. They are allowed to lie to you, you are not allowed to lie to them.
Because they're idiot followers and they were awed by an RDF
Yeah but just for protection from the cops
Yes of course it is a police state, but yes of course it's stupid to pretend you don't live in one when you do
Some people pray for more than they are willing to work for.