This is one of the things I found I really don't like working with recent qwen models.
If you read thru the reasoning. It will write stuff like, "I was asked to
I told you not to do anything other than read files under
These things have almost arrived at a state, I'd call "malicious compliance as a service." Which I do believe to be a training problem not a fundamental technology problem.
Linux succeeded because of the license.
No, Linux succeeded because BSD was held up in court. Users overwhelmingly wanted *nix on commodity PC hardware.
And you are seeing a similar disregard for the license here. Demonstrating the viability of Rust being more important than the GPL.
At some point we may have a human writer an a human director, and they prompt an AI. Is that still art?
If your argument is going to be boiled down to whether or not AI is considerd "art" then you have a very long road ahead of you.
My point is that if we have human writers and directors providing the creativity, and the AIs providing implementations, could it be art? I think that is the core of what we have to figure out.
Nope, it was the employees claim of "getting followed"
yet the point the officer made was "bringing out the camera", not "following". i know, i know, that's probably standard interview technique, right?
You are starting to understand. The officer wants to get the whole story from the followers side. The more he talks the better. If you start off with the serious issue that is your central concern that could spook him into silence. So start with the harmless stuff that will not tip him off.
anyway, merely "following" doesn't seem a crime to me either. but it's probably also a red flag that escalates
Its a public safety concern, its why the officer wants to hear the followers side of the story from the beginning.
my spider sense tells me that there is a tacit understanding between flock folks and police folks. not a conspiracy, mind, but they work together after all
And the officer is certainly aware of the wave of attacks on flock equipment. Hence concern over a flock employee being followed.
have a cordial conversation with him for 15 minutes to take him off yer back, errr, to gather information. standard procedure! happy flocking! as i said: incompetent or biased. or both.
Separating people about to fight is also a standard technique. Preventing the violence from breaking out. But truthfully, 15 minutes of getting the guy talking to describe the events so far is not really much.
Broadcasting regulations say that the major political parties must be given equal time on the public broadcast frequencies.
That's not what it says, and there's no evidence that an equal opportunity on the network (note "network", not show) was not afforded to the other candidates.
"The equal-time rule (47 U.S. Code 315 - Candidates for public office[1]) specifies that American radio and television broadcast stations must provide equivalent access to competing political candidates. This means, for example, that if a station broadcasts a message by a candidate, it must offer the same amount of time on the same terms (in, say, prime time) to an opposing candidate."
Thanks for proving me correct... That doesn't mention "major political parties" at all.
Nope, you are still mistaken. "Candidates" represent the political parties.
And you completely ignored the latter part of my claim - that there is no evidence that other candidates for this office were not offered an equal opportunity.
They were offered the same as Kimmel, non-broadcast venues where FCC fairness rules would not apply. Venues were Kimmel could be as partisan as he wanted to be.
Who is paying those independent evaluators?
Any way, best way to slow down at the moment is not to IPO.
I miss pc at power systems.
"Is it off?" was never a question.
Considerably more difficult than you imagine. Between them, they have almost 70 command-line options or flags. Taking into account that many of those behave differently depending on the presence or absence of other flags, there's a couple hundred different code paths. Then you need to handle directories, files, sparse files, sym- and hard-links, on and across different filesystems, not to mention the various file-like things scattered around (pipes, streams, etc.)
It's not rocket science, but neither is it trivial.
agencies can't be trusted to oversee themselves.
We knew that. But now we have proof.
Will anything happen because of that? Nah, I don't think so. A few token gestures maybe. A friendly mail to everyone saying to write better reasons, followed up by an informal mail that tells them to ignore the previous one.
This isn't a mistake. It's intentional. The more arbitrary and uncontrolled the police can act, the more it is feared, the more it is a tool for oppression and not a part of civil society, the more likely the cops will stand on the side of the powerful when there are protests or uprisings against the increasing oppression and economic divide.
Like punches are a foot away from making contact and things are just really really off.
I wonder how much of that is based on human actor motion capture used for the animations?
In a movie, we appreciate the craft in bring words to life and it does require a high level of skill.
Is this true for animated films too? What about hybrid live action and animated? Animated films that are CGI based rather than hand drawn/painted? Hand drawn that are computer "painted"?
At some point we may have a human writer an a human director, and they prompt an AI. Is that still art? Aren't human words still being brought to life?
While AI will certainly lead to a lot of slop, hollywood is hardly without a lot of slop already.
I also expect that some currently unknown indie writer and director will create something very artistic and enjoyable. As we have had artistic and enjoyable animated films in the past.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (3) Ha, ha, I can't believe they're actually going to adopt this sucker.
