So your mistake is thinking they're all alike. (Unless that was sarcasm or other humor.)

That's not really true. Consider the ABC proof. It is probably valid, but it uses math that almost nobody who is an English speaker can check. The author is currently translating it into a form that can be read by LEAN (an automated proof-checker). If it passes LEAN, there still won't be many mathematicians who can understand it.

I *think* a lot of those claims are unverified PR announcements by Chinese companies. They *MAY* be correct, but I tend to doubt PR announcements.

So far the evidence seems to indicate that they're still using as many high-level NVidia chips as they can get. I suspect research is being reported as developed systems. If the reports (understood in that light) are accurate, your estimate is correct, but your timeline is off by perhaps 5 years.

IIUC, the proof is verified by Lean, which is NOT an AI, but is rather a deterministic proof checker, and highly trusted.

Sorry, but that's not what reasoning models are doing. Don't trust the logs as accurate traces of their thinking.

OTOH, since the output is a proof, you don't need to even consider the log. Just check the proof, and (if properly formulated) there are deterministic methods of doing that.

Saying 1,0 *is* an integer is false. It converts to an integer. Whether it equals an integer depends on how you represent floats...though in every implemented system I'm aware of 1.0 does convert to 1. However saying 1.0 is within epsilon of 1 is true for every floating point system using a normal meaning of epsilon.

He lost me at "Power BI".

Ugh...what a POS.....it's the modern equivalent of MS Access....it gives people who can't code or design enough tool to create something they force others to use which causes time suck and damage along the way.

So what? What is the point you are attempting to make here?

To quit being a bunch of pussies....

OTOH, they didn't use up the AI in solving the problem, so it's still there to be used for something else. So you can't really count all the cost of building an training it against a problem that it solved as a test of its capabilities.

These windows DO open, don't they?

I mean, there's always portable units you can use.

Please enough with the excuses....sit and swelter if that's what you want, but geez....get used to it, this isn't going away you know.

Actually you've got a pretty good guess that the problems are quire hard, and a reasonable chance that they are indeterminate (unless they involve a finite subsection of math).

Fine...then sit there and swelter like it is the 1800's....I really do't give a fuck if people make excuses instead of solutions.

Slight warning....get used to it, this isn't going away you know....

I see some of these CVE's are fixed in trixie but not bookworm 6.1.177-1 (yet).

Still other CVE's are fixed in bookworm but not yet in trixie. Seems like a few reboots are in the offing.

First time I've seen several fixes in oldstable before stable. It must be a wild week over there. n.b. fixed, not 'not vulnerable'.

Glad the oldstable crew is hard at work!

Is anybody aware of open source hardware/software to do the page turning and photograph/OCR the pages?

Google's rig used a puff of air, IIRC.

I asked somebody in the field and they said, "oh, you want a professional rig - those cost $10K and up.

I was like, "no, I have several rare books I'd like to index and this setup is far less complicated than my $249 3D printer." (I already have a good camera.)

I thought I'd find a hackaday or something but my cursory search wasn't fruitful.

But how long would it take to implement in every supported OS version and then get all the developers to declare a manifest and update their app?

A policy change can be enforced tomorrow (for better or for worse).

The AI bros might even get Samsung to change their mind. Apparently their 'subcontractors' use this technique to scrape all the content they use for training.

Would threatening to cancel a year's RAM order from the chip subsidiary cause a decision to change in the TV subsidiary? I have no idea how dispersed and decentralized Samsung is.

I'd bet it will stick, though, which is likely for the best. Odds are people aren't running Tor exits on their TV's. Maybe there are legitimate apps I'm not aware of.