Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Florida Man says: It's wabbit season (Score 1) 15

The whole scheme seems more along the lines of "Oh neat, someone gave us free money to play with plush toys and every once in awhile kill a snake" than a truly cost effective means of controlling an invasive species. I kind of expected a rabbit killbot, but nope, it's just a cuddly looking fake rabbit in a cage, and still requires a human to venture out to dispatch the snake after receiving the proximity alert.

Maybe they're saving the killbot features for RoboBunny 2.0.

Comment Re: If Apple is against it... (Score 1) 33

Something I've not used in...Jesus.....a long, long, LONG time, and was quite glad to see it go "bye-bye!"

Last thing I need in life is another cord to get tangled up in itself, with other cords, and me!

You know what I really want? A device that can "beam" power to other devices in the room, with minimum configuration. It would be awesome to have a little box on my dresser that plugs into the wall, and that little device charges every phone, pair of headphones, watches and whatever else that is in the room, automatically, and while they're in use.

Somebody should be working on that shit.

Comment Florida Man says: It's wabbit season (Score 1) 15

Previously, there was an effort to use live rabbits as snake lures but that became too expensive and time-consuming, Kirkland said. ... The total cost per robot rabbit is about $4,000, financed by the water district, he added.

More expensive than $4k each!? Were they buying their live rabbits from a Ferengi?

Also, note to the /. editors, the story icon is cute, but Florida does not have a problem with invasive Python scripts.

Comment Re:I can't see insurance companies (Score 1) 41

A self-driving car will follow every rule to the letter and it will refuse to speed.

You really should watch that video of a Tesla plowing right through a fake wall.

Which also brings me to: Have you ever actually priced insurance for a Tesla? It's horribly expensive. It's like the insurance companies know you're likely to be distracted by the touch screen UI or eating a meal with the self driving enabled, and wind up upside-down in a ditch.

By the time self driving tech works well enough to deploy on a large scale, you won't own a car anyway. You'll just summon one via an app and insurance will be something for the robocab company to worry about. Certainly, the wealthier members of society will still have their own privately owned cars, and if you're well off enough to afford a car that sits stationary in a parking spot for the majority of its life, you'll also be able to afford the insurance.

Comment Re:I can't believe it (Score 1) 41

Did they lie?

They didn't know what they were talking about, they lied about their powers of prognostication, or both.

Self-driving cars may one day obsolete human drivers, I even believe that they potentially could in my lifetime. But I don't think it will happen soon, and I don't think it's a particularly worthwhile goal either. Instead we should eliminate most of the need to drive, and get down to lighter vehicles (think SxS or NEV) for most of the remaining (rural, recreational, emergency) use. We could delete a lot of highway lanes and run rail up the center of those rights of way, and keep the rest for local trucking.

Slashdot Top Deals

Prof: So the American government went to IBM to come up with a data encryption standard and they came up with ... Student: EBCDIC!"

Working...