Problem wide open. Microsoft already thought of this solution at least 25 years ago.

They implemented warnings by interrupting the code, opening a pop-up window with two options: proceed or bloc?. I'll give you a guess how that panned out.

There is only one outcome when users are repeatedly interrupted for security reasons. They learn to press yes without even reading the message, while being annoyed by the interruption. Black hats love that.

Child, you do not live in a vacuum. You live in a country with laws. These laws apply to you. Ignoring them will be bad for you. Don't do it.

There are two issues here.

1) Ads are evil, they are a form of propaganda.

2) LLMs are ideally suited to be ad machines, unconstrained from reality.

OpenAI is desperate for revenue, to claw itself out of the gigantic debt hole that Altman has created. Whether this will work is unlikely, but the advertising move will produce much revenue initially. It will also make it obvious that LLMs are a waste of time, eventually, and a form of spam that should be outlawed.

That was a crime problem, not a prohibition problem. Turns out when you let criminals run around with impunity for years, you get bad behaviour. But if you shoot them or prosecute them promptly, even if it's for tax evasion, things get better. Who knew?

No, no, and no. Do not confuse patents and copyrights. Two entirely different kettle of fish. Both are elements of the intellectual property stack. Yet they work entirely differently.

If you want change, maybe educate yourself on IP laws, then work to change these laws. Venting on slashdot won't do any good.

There's a meta-implication though, which is that reinforcement learning based AI training also cannot achieve the kind of existential fear that humans get when they are threatened with consequences for serious offences.

You have too much faith in magical thinking. Filtering generative output without regard to age is an unsolvable problem for AI companies, and your naive ideas about how the law should view impersonation attempts and libel/slander (not to mention possible blackmail) are cute.

There is no world where making shit up about other people via AI is a long-term acceptable strategy.

It's meant for people with some life experience. Difficult to summarize succinctly \o/

7 grand for a 6 year old design? Fucking hell.

I don't understand why these two fell for it.

They spent too much time believing the Orange Drivel machine about how America rules the World.

The issue is that actual real enforcement of laws on company executives who do bad things is no longer a thing in the American mindset. When it occurs in other countries the kneejerk response is "we don't do that, so you guys shouldn't do it either".

Two words. Look them up. 1. collage. 2. Internet.

Well get Raytheon on the phone then.

What's that math based on, numbers pulled straight from your arse? More likely you launch 100 missiles. 90 fail in flight, 9 are intercepted and one goes somewhere because its commercial grade gps either cant withstand or keep up with a hypersonic flight regime but the body has managed to not break up before it runs out of fuel. At least launching proper stuff once the enemy runs low on interceptors or you manage saturation your hit rate will sky rocket. Temu missiles probably not.

launch 100 civilian grade hypersonic missiles at anything and you'll be lucky if 1 doesn't burn up or explode on the way.