AI is and will continute to be increasingly empowered with indifferent safety precautions because the power money confers is all that matters to techbros.
First world systems are far more fragile than they appear to humans. AI doesn't have that problem.
That's it, I'm done with Ubuntu.
So many shitty things are being done "with AI". I love AI, but it doesn't help that the devs doing all these AI Rust tools seem to have little to zero experience with development, or thoroughness.
And for encryption? Fuck outta here.
If that'll all they intended they could have agreed on a very narrowly-tailored agreement limiting the use to the same aspects of the film as manual animation.
Maybe Cage is doing some solidarity thing with animators or maybe Amazon intended to do much more and were attempting an underhanded trick.
It's hard to tell except you'd expect Cage to say something if animators' jobs were his cause.
It sounds like his agent or manager knew what was up.
> you apparently desire to use systems beyond their design points
Who doesn't include cost in design?
If my CPU/SoC is plenty fast for my task and the DRAM is faster than I need it to be and a CPU instruction to compress takes less power than a write out to the bus - it would just be wasteful to manufacture and purchase twice as much DRAM as the application needs.
Either the end user gets a better price (and all money is the result of expending energy, so we save again) or the manufacturer makes a larger profit (in a constrained market).
Now then - all you lunatics embedding Electron and costing me 400MB to send an 80 character text message - we need to talk about this.
CRAM seems like a great idea but it's not the solution to not caring about the Craft.
There's no (human) 'we' that have been through this kind of rapid climate change.
The end of the last glacial maximum and Younger Dryas changes were quite rapid, and in some locations but not globally reached the same rate for short periods. We see in the palenteological and archaelogical records that when local conditions did change rapidly then either people moved or the local civilisation collapsed, or a combination of the two.
Of course, and make no mistake, there are going to be some extinctions
Where some might include most species, as has been the case in the past. Hopefully, we can avoid that.
While your concern is applaudable, explain how during times in the past when CO2 was much higher than now, the world didn't end.
For many of the types of organisms that existed during periods of rapid change in CO2, it did end.
This system will self-destruct in five minutes.
