Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:celebrities (Score 1) 174

I think this is how celebrities feel, stalked by cameras. It is what killed Princes Diana.

Riding around with an arms merchant is what killed Diana. Alternatively, some claim she was about to expose something about land mines, but there's really nothing to expose there since nobody doesn't know that people use them and in order for that to happen, someone has to make them and sell them. Nobody wants to know any of this shit because all of the allegedly civilized/developed nations are in on it. They are ALL massive arms dealers. Watch some videos from the UK tank museum sometime, they talk constantly about how these vehicles were sold to that regime and participated in such and such conflict, usually without mentioning that they were acts of oppression or whatnot. It's just all jerking off over military hardware all the time.

Comment Re: when reporting becomes stalking (Score 1) 173

It's now illegal to investigate fraud in California.

Every CWD (county welfare department) in California has a SIU (special investigations unit) made up of badge-and-gun-carryingcops. If you have evidence of fraud like trafficking of EBT cards, your CWD's SIU department would appreciate a call.

Comment Re: Kimmel Doesn't Want to give Republicans a Pla (Score 1) 268

Nope. Going broadcast for both creates fairness.

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA

You misunderstand. In a live broadcast Paxton may mentioned some inconvenient truth about Talarico. Some things he did or said. A live broadcast allows that to reach the public. In a YouTube based interview that can be edited out.

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA

I triple-quaduple promise you that Paxton would WANT his video edited out to remove things which are true. But it will never happen because he is a) too much a coward and b) too busy doing securities frauds which you support because it goes along with your support for child rape.

Die in a fire, Child rape lover.

Comment Re:Goal (Score 1) 24

Once again: training a model with the reward being "does it solve the task?" without looking at how it solves the task is very, very dangerous.

So, people are able to recognize this, and yet in the other threads here about Anthropic calling for a slow down of AI research, everyone seems convinced that this isn't about the risks really at all.

Comment poor babies (Score 4, Interesting) 173

employees working "in the field" must "prioritize their safety" and "may contact law enforcement when they believe they are being threatened, harassed, followed, or otherwise face a safety concern."

They are a safety concern. They are creating an opportunity for a foreign adversary. Does anyone really believe these clowns are capable of maintaining security?

Comment Re:We are going so fast we need to slow down! (Score 0) 104

You can if you want, claim that OpenAI has had serious issues with honesty, especially with Sam Altman, their CEO. But Anthropic's record is a lot better. More to the point, the Theranos comparison doesn't work. The fundamental object Theranos was selling just didn't exist. AI systems do, and they are getting millions of people to use them. The situations are wildly different.

Slashdot Top Deals

The more I want to get something done, the less I call it work. -- Richard Bach, "Illusions"

Working...