They can run to a child rape Island apparently, since there are no repercussions for that

Your post is broadly correct and on point- but the quoted sentence is a bit of an overstatement.
The only case where copyright has been held to not apply to AI generated output was where the plaintiff asserted it operated autonomously.
He later tried to change his argument to, "well I wrote the prompt", but the court said he waived his ability to assert that in his original filing.
Essentially- a court has not ruled on "prompt-driven generation", but the ruling strongly implies that such copyright would be granted to the prompt author.

That's limited to the 9th circuit currently. It will definitely be interesting to see where it goes.

you're a troll, fuck off

The servers will be almost impossible to sell in this country. So... They will go into a container headed for China, where there is lots of demand for them, especially the ones they aren't allowed to buy.

It would be a lot cheaper to have a rocket beacon.

Ads are just pissing on your brain, so fuck them for this in the first place.

Bring back the good old days of Firefox when it contained nothing unnecessary and everything else was an addon and themes could do more than change colors and we'll talk.

California is not a desert. Why the fuck do people keep saying that?
Do you think they grow pistachios in the fucking Mojave?

That aside- you're right that agriculture is the problem, but it's not because where they're grown doesn't get ample water- it does. It's because they've dialed it to 20 even past that.
They produce 10% of the US' produce on 4% of its farmland.

The OS for consumers is the same as the OS for business, just with some functionality turned off (and it can be turned back on, though it's not obvious or supported.) And the one thing supports the other. With less home use there will be less business use.

California is not a desert. California absolutely has a desert in it- but that, unsurprisingly, is not where things are grown.
Educate yourself.

Tell us more about how you know nothing about how ballots are qualified

Some of them- very much so.
You can tell because they confidently say things that are laughably wrong. I can think of a few posters on this site that fit that criteria.
Of course, not everyone is like that.

I have software written in 2008 still in wide use today.
My predecessors (one of which is even a customer of mine) wrote code 40 years ago that is still in use today.

You are wrong.

While demanding a language can be racist, it can also very much not be. I wouldn't be quick to make that particular judgement.
Lingua Francas exist all over the world, some de facto, some very much de jure.

That was certainly an assumptive rant.

Tell us more about how little you know about how votes are verified, despite the information being public