Life just is. It needs no meaning. That's just humans craving the father figure, a pretext for authority.

Let the States figure it out. THAT is a Tea Party position.

Word...

That's the Jerry Springer Sect, right?

Jesus was Roman psyops

Oh no sir! It all began when Eve bit the apple..

Women!

Always the trend setters they are, except when it comes to rock 'n roll...

Heh, that's a good one. How do you restore trust in a system that is corrupt by design, not by defect? You cannot ever trust any system to works on concentrated authority. It is impossible to acquire adequate oversight.

Whenever you say "liberty", you should put that little smiley thingy next to it, or maybe even the sarcastic emoticon if there is one, since you have already proven you're not serious.

The Internet is not television.

So sorry for the inconvenience. We'll be fixing it soon. Please be patient.

without general capitulation...

Somebody locked down Slashdot archives, but I broke through with my acoustic modem. The connection was kinda slow, hence the difference in time stamps

Do you deny... bla bla bla

Yes I do! Wilson scratched an itch. What of it? Our current "evils" go back at least 13 billion years. You should not try to deny nature its due.

Your vote is your support and approval. You can voice opposition all you want, but it all means diddly when it doesn't jibe with your acts. You provide no incentive for change when you vote for the same old crap. Or you really don't want change, not when it could jeopardize what you have. That's called being caught in the monkey trap. And you most certainly are. What's funny is that Smitty (pudge, and many others) is on the other side of the tree, caught in the same trap, with both of you clinging to the same nut, even when there's a basket full of nuts right at your feet. Right where they want you. Y'all are such easy pickin's.

On the contrary, It is with your clinging to 18th century cliches that attempt to muddy up the waters. But the waters are crystal clear. The mud is on your goggles. And you run from the truth.

The ACA would have been far more likely to fail to pass the Senate.

Exactly so, sir! To the great displeasure of the people who financed the campaigns, on both sides. And had it been so, they would finance different candidates, and one of them would be president today. I cannot understand why you fight and deny the glaringly obvious. Nature is such a beautiful sight to behold. You need to accept and embrace what we are.

...I have not supported his actions.

Yes you have. You voted for him, probably twice. That indicates full approval of his actions, regardless how they contradict his words. He's not a "lawn chair". He's a comfy chair..