Patron Saint of the Internet 208
Quite a number of people have been writing with the news that the Catholic Church is considering naming a patron saint of the Internet. The strongest current contender is St. Isisdore, an 8th century Spanish saint, with is created with making one of the first databases - a 20 volume encyclopedia.
Re:thats nifty? (Score:1)
OLIPN (Score:1)
Re:Ever lived in Belgium? (Score:1)
-Dean
Re:Patron saint? (Score:1)
Case in point, prostitutes. Prostitutes do wonderful things for society, yet am I correct in thinking the church isn't overjoyed by them? Yet for a couple of quid (pounds), a bloke (as it generally is) is satisfied (for a while), and doesn't get overcome by his feelings of lust/natural desires that he has to rape some (almost) defenceless person (possibly a girl so young as to almost be a child)?!?!?
Anyway, I wouldn't say indulging in the fantasy is indulging in the bad thought, I would say actually going out and following/stalking/raping the TV star would be indulging (and I agree wrong).
You mention double-standards, but it seems as though the church has more of them than me!
Man, I must appear like some kind of anti-religious nut!
Re:Patron saint? (Score:1)
But the fact that many people think it is alright doesn't mean it is right. "Release" becomes an excuse, and while for many people, they could still somewhat control themselves before going too far, but for many others, sexual fantasies lead them to a slippery slope.
St. Maria Goretti (11 years old) was murdered by Alessandro (19 years old) when she refused Alessandro's rape attempt. Maria was pure at heart, while Alessandro was full of impure thoughts... his room was full of pornographical magazines and posters... Impure thoughts and pornography, as illustrated in this tragedy, are not releases, but rather, fuel to Alessandro's sexual desire to the point that he tried to rape little Maria, and when she refused, he stabbed her 14 times and left her to die. Would he even had thought of raping her had he not been mesmerized and his moral desensitized by pornography?
Regarding prostitutes: The Church does not shun them. (At least we shouldn't.) There are quite a few canonized saints who were once prostitutes before their conversion. The most famous of all is probably St. Mary Magdalen, the Penitent. You might know her story in the Bible: She was nearly stoned to death when the Pharisees caught her in the very act of adultery. When they brought her to Jesus, Jesus asked them whoever has no sin can cast the first stone. The Pharisees hesitated and finally escaped one by one. Jesus then forgave her sin, and said, "Go now in peace, and sin no more." From then on, St. Mary Magdalen left her old sinful way of life, and became a devout follower of Jesus. Just like Jesus had loved her unconditionally, St. Mary Magdalen pour out her love for God too.
Prostitution is sin... but, we hate the sin and love the sinner. In many aspects, prostitutes are victims of our society.
I don't think the Church is being double-standard in this regard. The Church is rather consistent, actually, and some would even say, "radical or "extreme". Raping is wrong, that we all know. Premarital sex? Why not? It is just casual fun, right? Fantasizing about sex is a sin? You've gotta be kidding! And yet, the Church is not budging to public pressure. Afterall, the Church cannot teach against what Jesus taught us: "Whenever a man look upon a woman with lust, he has already commited adultery with her in his heart."
Yes, I realize that perhaps over 90% of Slashdot readers would disagree with what I wrote above. However, to me, to my family, and to many of my friends, Jesus' teaching make perfect sense.
Anthony
P.S. Well, there are lots of people who are anti-religious, so if you are indeed one, you are not alone. However, I do hope that you were just kidding about being an anti-religious nut.
Re:Patron saint? (Score:1)
Re:God no... (Score:1)
Re:The internet and religion (Score:1)
I'll have to admit I was quite surprised by this. I was rather expecting a condemnation of the Internet as a vile tool of Satan rife with pornography and atheism.
Also, let's all take joy in the fact that Jerry Falwell has not discovered push technology.
"Shove down throat" technology perhaps.
The Great Schism Part Deaux (Score:1)
Could be fun to watch though...
-Subotai
Re:You gotta... (Score:1)
Church might not approve... (Score:2)
1. Sacrificing AOL disks to the god of Packet Storms
2. Chanting the names of great hackers to ensure that code will compile without errors.
3. Building a shrine to the god of Greater Bandwidth entirely out of MSN CD-ROMs.
4. Imploring the High Priestess of IT for a larger disk quota.
5. Daemon processes. 'Nuff said.
Re:GOD? (Score:1)
Hmm. God for sale. How ironic.
paul
Re:You gotta... (Score:1)
Re:BBC News == Supermarket Tabloid of the Internet (Score:1)
Re:GOD? (Score:1)
---Jason
Re:God no... (Score:1)
I say unto you, check thy facts and thy history. Read the Apology of Socrates.
I quote:
"This you must recognize, the god has commended me to do. And I think that no greater good has ever befallen you in the state than my service to the god. For I spend my whole life in going about and persuading you all to give your first and greatest care to the improvement of your souls, and not till you have done that to think of your bodies or your wealth."
Socrates was very religious. (And I have no clue where you got this, man-as-god BS.)
thats nifty (Score:1)
What patron saints are (Score:2)
Anyone interested in looking up patron saints should try saints.catholic.org [catholic.org] -- it contains an index of the officially-recognized patron saints, plus some good background information.
I will quote their explaination of patron saints here:
Some things to note -- the news article simply mentioned a popular movement to have the Vatican declare St. Isidore the patron saint of the Internet. These popular movements happen all the time within the Roman Catholic Church. Some receive official approval, some do not.
Of course, any Catholic (or anyone else) can request the intercession of any saint in any matter. No one needs to wait for Vatican approval.
Personally, while I can see why St. Isidore would show an interest in the Internet, there are some other saints I would nominate:
GOD? (Score:1)
natural law (Score:1)
--Paul
Saint IGNUcius! (Score:1)
Patron Saint by the Pope?!?! (Score:1)
Re:GOD? (Score:1)
Hoorah! (Score:2)
And we _all_ know that if anything needs a patron saint right now, it's the Internet. An omnipotent God just doesn't cut it when the backbone goes down. We need somebody who really cares.
(All in the name of good humor, folks. :) )
Re:Saint IGNUcius! (Score:1)
and convenience stores.
Why Not? (Score:2)
Being able to get a patron saint medal that can be stuck to the front of a server isn't a bad idea at all, IMHO. Seriously, most sysadmins can use all the help they can get!
Re:Patron Saint by the Pope?!?! (Score:1)
What about Al Gore? (Score:1)
Re:God know... (Score:1)
The internet, as well as many other things are a result of human inginuity. Clearly not all people believe this, but I believe that human inginuity is not something we made, but something we were given. I am confident you will disagree with me, and I throroughly don't mind at all.
How long has there been a Vatican Political agenda. Not long, the Vatican has not been a soverign nation until this century. This has been very good. It has made some official separation between the Italian political arena and the Church. Clearly, after hundreds of years of the Roman Catholic Church, it will be a while before the Italian part has a chance to fade. The Catholic Church is OLD. When you have been around long enough, people will sometimes do really dumb things. This is no exception. I hope that other people are more forgiving of your decision making, than you are of organized religion.
I am not exacly sure why I responded...knee jerk reatcion I guess. Not so much the aspect of faith, but the historical half-truths and bitter spin you put on the topic. Clearly, your convictions are deep-seated and I am not trying to "win you over." I'm just thinking and letting my fingers click away until I feel better.
This is Slashdot; you can do that.
Internet Saints Up a Couple Levels (Score:3)
St. Marconi of Unlimited Bandwidth
St. Turing the Mystic
St. Hopper of Transubstantiation of Bugs
St. Ada the Inscrutable
St. Stallman of Hoofed Mammals
St. Torvalds the Flightless
and from Jimhotep:
St. Tesla the Enabler
Big deal. There's lots of patron saints. (Score:3)
St. Isidore's already listed.
Re: (Score:2)
John Postel? (Score:1)
For those who speak spanish... (Score:1)
Jaculatoria....
San isidro de Sevilla, sabio y escritor, Que mi correo no traiga un virus destructor...
St. Linus? (Score:1)
The miracles are probably pretty easy to take care of. Anyone who can understand kernel level code obviously has some divine powers...
but they also have to be dead, and i dont think that anyone wants to make linus a martyr right now.
Now Bill Gates... maybe if we sacrificed him....
St. Vidicon of the Cathode (Score:1)
It should be St. Vidicon of the Cathode...
Unfortunatly I'm drawing a blank as the the series of books that's from, or what the real anme of the character was.
Re: I think you'll find that... (Score:2)
It's all too easy to bring up the Church's missteps throughout the centuries, but these are human errors, some graver than others. That they were wrongly committed in the name of God does not repudiate the value of the religion's message or its true core doctrines, IMHO. And for centuries the concept of personal freedom was largely unknown to the masses who knew only the Church as the starting and ending points of most aspects of their lives. I think for far too long religion got bogged down in the details of things like the Bible, a fascinatingly confusing document which led to the justification for all sorts of terrible deeds. Recently there have been shifts away from organized religions to "personal faith", a more direct connection to one's deity of choice. A lot of right-wing fundamentalist Christian groups emphasize this, as a result of their disillusionment with Lutherans, Methodists, Baptists, etc. etc.
All that aside, today you and I have the freedom to cheerfully ignore religion or complain about it as we see fit. That freedom comes from the labors of generations of our ancestors, Christian, Jew, Muslim, or none of the above. While acknowledging the fact that organized religions have made mistakes, their importance should not be so wantonly dismissed. While I am a Christian (Lutheran specifically), I'm quite liberal, and if you want to be a heathen, hey, that's fine with me. I wonder if the fierce reprisals against religion are because the online demographics are much different than the real world...i.e., a higher concentration of agnostics and atheists in the online population. Who knows?
I would also not be surprised (if you are Caucasian) if you owe your existence to the 'Catholic heritage' at some point way back in history.
Actually. . . (Score:1)
A Clear Error in BBC article. (Score:1)
Pliny the Elder was the known 1st encyclopedia compiler in the European setting. Isidore's work is regarded inferior to Pliny's in quality and quantity. And there are some Chinese candidates for the title "The 1st Encyclopedist", let alone other civilizations, though I believe that title must go to D'Alembert & Diderot.
Now I wonder, what happened to BBC writers' and editors' intelligence. When had this decline bagun?
St. Beuno, Patron of Computer Technicians (Score:1)
Pope Lx Streetmentioner
Re:You gotta... (Score:1)
I also have a difficult time with the belief that people are just like all other mammals in the act of procreation, since the human is the only mammal without a penile bone. Somehow, there is a significant difference in the procreation of humans compared to other mammals. This seems to lessen the role of a precedent that other mammals might set for us humans.
Re:You gotta... (Score:1)
Re:God no... (Score:1)
And no arguments that there are other places and other times for religion. Because there are other places and other times for atheism as well: the public schooling system.
And anyways, just because some organization says that they're going to name someone as the protector of all who travel the 'info superhighway', doesn't mean you have to observe that naming, or wear a medallion or anything.
What about Saint Dogbert? (Score:1)
whoa! (Score:1)
There has been no official statement from Rome (Score:2)
This is very signifigant. Unless there is an official statement from Rome, this is just a rumor. I'm not saying it won't happen.. I'm just saying that it's not definite yet. At all.
Re:thats nifty (Score:1)
The use of the 'net for distributing pornography and quasi-legal purposes also goes pretty well with the characteristics of Hermes.
Re:You gotta... (Score:1)
Of course it is intended to be pleasure (intended by who? I have to think you believe in a god), or else nobody would do it! It's just a simple fact of evolution! So when the humans reached a level of intelligence, connecting the sex with the babys, they also began to control it. See the bible, Onan for example!
Szo
Re:You gotta... (Score:1)
Every sperm is great
If a sperm is wasted
God gets quite irate.
SAINT BILL??? (Score:1)
The patron saint of the blue screen perhaps?
Re:Patron saint? (Score:1)
Brainwashed? If you believe that 1.1 billion people have been brainwashed and that you're not, you need to take a very hard look at your reality. EXAMPLE: Tear up a $100 bill. I mean into a thousand, untapeable pieces. Go ahead, right now. You won't, because you BELIEVE it's worth something.
You're as "brainwashed" as anyone else, my friend.
As for Windoze, say what you will. To the winner goes the spoils. That's capitalism. If Red Hat or someone else can wrest control, great! In 10 years others will be complaining about the lack of choice in Linux, and how much BETTER OSDEJURE is because it's cool because it's not as popular as the fascist Red Had.
WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE!
Ahhha, this will come in handy (Score:1)
Needless to say, I am very pleased at this initiative. All I would need to do is light a candle to St. Isidore to cleanse and protect me from the nasty little viruses, trojan horses and security holes that are clearly the work of
Satan.
Hell, the Vatican was ahead even of the Discordians on this one.
All hail St. Isidore!
Re:Patron saint? (Score:1)
Last count: ~ 5.7 Billion
Ergo, % RCC = ~ 19.3%
...which is still a heck of a lot of folks.
Ethnocentricity has no place on the internet? Who's saying that there is any? If the RCC says St. So-and-so is now the patron of the Internet, would it change the Net any more than the "Our Lady of the Highways" shrine changes the Jersey Turnpike? (read: it doesn't)
I don't think so.
Re:Burn THEM! (Score:1)
Really, they've un-excommunicated Galileo, and have done quite a bit since Vatican II (early 60s conference in Rome) to reverse the oppressiveness and backwardsness that were the hallmarks of the church from the inquisition through the industrial revolution.
Bottom Line: Hey, the RCC isn't perfect. But they're trying. Are you?
Re:One's Not Quite Enough (Score:1)
You forget St Jon! (Score:1)
Alas, the canonisation of St Jon the creator has been lost in the Postel.
(Collapses into hysterical laughter)
Re:BBC News == Supermarket Tabloid of the Internet (Score:1)
if the Vatican offends you, just pray to BOB, or Discordia, Cthulhu, etc...
it's all in good fun...
nmarshall
#include "standard_disclaimer.h"
R.U. SIRIUS: THE ONLY POSSIBLE RESPONSE
Top X Lines Uttered by the Internet Saint (Score:5)
2) "That'll be 20 Hail Marys and 5 lines of assembly code"
3) "Thou shall not covet thy cubicle neighbor's video card"
4) "And God shall smite thee by sending a power surge through your CPU"
5) "God is compassionate, my child...everyone is tempted by the Fruit of the Tree of Microsoft once or twice"
6) "And Apple begat Macintosh, Macintosh begat the PowerMac, and PowerMac begat iMac..."
7) "And on the Seventh Day, Torvald created Linux. And Torvald saw that it was good.
Re:St. Alan? (Score:1)
--
Re:St. Vidicon of the Cathode (Score:1)
Re:Patron saint? (Score:1)
Anyway, this is the wrong place for a spiritual debate.
Re:God no... (Score:1)
You neglect the influence of the ancient Greeks on those religious cultures, and on modern cultures despite the religions.
You imply that the religions are responsible for the intellectual foundation of Western society. Wouldn't it be more accurate to say the church scholars are responsible for it? It is the nature of those who would choose that life to treasure knowledge and history, regardless of religious teachings. With religion so dominant, where do you think academic-minded people would gravitate?
Now consider this, where is the scientific method in this religious tradition?
The internet and religion (Score:3)
If the catholic church were to declare a patron saint for the internet, that means the church either does not understand the internet, or that there may be hope yet for it to become less of a conservative patriarchal hierarchical institution.
Re:Internet Saints (Score:2)
Re:Whatever happened to... (Score:1)
I wonder if he'll see this post...
[OT] Kibo (was Re:Whatever happened to...) (Score:1)
Oh, sure, they claim it's Japanese for "hope," but we know better...
Eric
--
My favorite part... (Score:1)
It seems to me that anyone capable of witnessing such a feat should have an equal claim to the spot.
Re:God no... (Score:1)
Re:The Vatrican has a linux kernel site (Score:1)
The only two machine which have an FTP service on them both give back:
555-You are not permitted to use the ftp operation.
555-Please contact your system administrator.
555-
555
Now I don't know what OS they're using on their WWW server, but it's running Netscape Enterprise server.
You might, of course, mean either vatican.org or vatican.com, neither of whihc has anything to do with the Holy See.
Even their search doesn't say anything about Linux, although it does mention Compaq and Altavista... And gives some mighty weird junk back if you simply ask it for the HEADer of '/'...
Sorry for pissing on your fire, and all.
Meanwhile, Isidore (Soon to be known, I hope, as Izzy), only gets a mention in the footnotes of Vatican II, in relation to the celibacy of the preisthood.
More St. Internet nominations (Score:1)
They will save us from the mess Intel left with us, and allow the Internet to spread the gospel of bigendianess.
Re:The Vatrican has a linux kernel site (Score:1)
Not sure if the site is physically located in VC, but it makes sense that it would be.
Re:Hoorah! (Score:1)
| in the United States, the Catholic Church
| doesn't consider the Internet to be a cesspool
| of paganism and various other Bad Things.
You're confusing the Catholics with the Southern Baptists - the Southern Baptists think everything is evil.
Re:The Vatrican has a linux kernel site (Score:1)
Upon inspection I found that the site is actually hosted in the UK. ???
Re:thats nifty (Score:1)
Arch Angel Gabriel (Score:1)
wouldn't the Internet fall under that?
Re:Patron saint? (Score:1)
I personally am GLAD the RCC moves slowly. Society needs an anchor, a set of ideals that keep it civilized. Imagine had the church gone pro-eugenics in the 1900s. Many of us would no doubt be dead. (unless you're PERFECT in every possible way. Yeah, right). Et cetera.
The point is that the church is actually very good about keeping up with the times, all things considered. Why NOT a patron saint for the 'Net? It HAS kept up with modern technology... ever go to the Vatican website? Remember the flood of fax machines, computers and other stuff the church smuggled into Poland during the Reagan years?
Santa Tecla (Score:1)
Re:Whatever happened to... (Score:2)
Can someone refresh me on this one?
Arch Angel Gabriel (Score:1)
(really, look it up!) . Wouldn't the Internet fall under his domain?
Re:What about Saint Dogbert? (Score:1)
With his right paw, he heals broken technology, and, with the scepter in his left paw, he drives out the Demons of Stupidity. He also has a cute little hat (which is actually modeled after a fancy folded napkin).
Eric
(*) OK, so it's just the little punch-out thing from a Dilbert calendar. Deal with it.
--
OT: Nitpick (Score:1)
The Vatican has their own TLD and domain name; vatican.va.
Re:God no... (Score:1)
The fact Algebra came out the Moslem world is unlikely a freak of nature.
I find it ironic that Newton concluded that being able to describe all physical movement with five simple equations was evidence of God.
Re:Internet Saints Up a Couple Levels (Score:1)
Re:You gotta... (Score:1)
Well, most of us wouldn't...
Interestingly enough... (Score:2)
I'm not declaring my stance on birth control here. I'm just saying that nothing is set in stone, not even what the Catholic Church teaches.
--Another practicing roman catholic/linux geek
Isn't this a little late? (Score:1)
another article on this... (Score:1)
Wired has this too, here [wired.com].
http://www.wired.com/news/news/culture/story/20
St. Coupertino[sic] == Cupertino, Ca? (Score:1)
Tom Byrum
Re:Patron Saint by the Pope?!?! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
God no... (Score:3)
Oh dear god no. I'm happy being a heathen without further indoctrination from a fucking organised religion as Catholicism which has traditionally been responsible for the alientation, persecution of many people advocating doctrines which did not fall with in the Vatican's political agenda.
There is no room for God here. We're a product in spite of the Catholic heritage certainly not as a result of it. If I want to pray it sure as hell will not to be what I am told is permissable by a body which murdered and desicrated scientists, philosophers, astronomers, witches...
I recant!
Re: (Score:2)
Whatever happened to... (Score:2)
And for that matter, Legba?
Though I suppose Isidore is appropriate for his accomplishments. Glad to see the Vatican is more techno-savvy than the extreme right-wing.
Hang on St. Christopher, on the passenger side (Score:2)
great line by Tom Waits. He's gone on tour again, and is better than ever.
the AntiCypher
Ia! Ia! Shub-Internet! (Score:3)
The church has no idea what peril they are entering; they live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that they should voyage far. Sending your prayer packets to this so-called "St. Isisdore" only helps to draw attention to both the source and destination addresses.
"But whose attention?" you ask. Well, perhaps it would be better to ask "What's attention?" There are impossibly ancient hungers that lurk out there, furtively waiting in the dark until the comm satellites are right. And when the time comes, it will be both swift and agonizingly slow at the same time. A swift tentacle probing here, a ping packet there, and then you will be beset by the true horror: Shub-Internet, the black beast of the 'Net with a thousand bastard processes!
We already have a patron ... thing. (I guess calling it a "saint" wouldn't quite be right, huh?) Better to leave well enough alone, and pray (quietly to yourself, where nothing can snoop your prayer) that the dawn of Its era comes long after you are safely in the grave.
The Vatrican has a linux kernel site (Score:2)
It's funny to tell newbies they can download the latest linux kernel from the vatican's ftp site.
Here! The Greek Pantheon (Score:2)
I was not able to fit the whole post in the Reply form (how do you do that?). For now here is an excerpt, but it well worth the effort fetching the original article from UseNet:
-Eos (goddess of dawn): goddess of the bootstrap processes (lilo, Drive A:, BootManager, boot.ini, IO.SYS, etc).
-Nyx (goddess of night): goddess of shutdown -h, screen blanking, and Jolt.
-Morpheus (god of dreams): god of vaporware.
-Muses (nine sisters, goddesses of respective arts and sciences): goddesses of Yahoo, and related Internet directories; goddesses of multimedia and multimedia plugins.
-Hestia (goddess of the hearth): goddess of servers and standalone units; patron of proxy servers and (with Aesculapius, see below) firewalls.
-Titans (various important, antecedant gods): Ada, Babbage, Turing, Hopper (goddess of _software_ programming**), Thompson, Kernighan & Ritchie, GHades (giving the devil his due), and many more.
-Ares (god of destructive war): god of flamers and flaming; also, patron god of all that is M$; god of Doom, Quake, etc.
-Pan (god of flocks & shepherds): god of NNTP; also, along with Demeter, protects databases; patron god of tarballs and PKWare.
-Hymen (first name, "Buster"; god of marriage): patron of device drivers; god of application suites (MS Office, Corel WP suite, StarOffice, etc.); god of Java.
-Eris (goddess of strife & discord--she began the Trojan War): another patron of Usenet; goddess of software copyright infringement. li>-Priapus (god of fertility): god of Internet; patron of the viruses that work by loading up one's ha unending Usenet strings and cascades; god of software bloat; god of AOL & MSN disks.
-Hermes (messenger of the gods, also, patron of thieves, highwaymen, and, I believe, of commerce): god of spam.
-Athena (goddess of wisdom, and all that is noble in war): (with Tux)Linux; patron goddess of GNU.
-Aesculapius (born mortal, deified as god of Medicine): patron god of Unix gurus; god of UPSs, spike protectors, firewalls, etc.
-Chaos: god of random # generators; patron of trolls; god of Error 404.
Re:The internet and religion (Score:2)
Just because the Internet is not a Catholics only club does not mean that the Catholic users of it can not have a patron saint for it.
St. Christopher is the patron saint of travelers. I do not hear travelers of non-Catholic faiths decrying this - or worse yet, refusing to travel to avoid the accidental labeling as Catholics by proxy. Most non-Catholics simply do not care.
As a recovering Catholic, I am encouraged to see the Church trying to look forward (albeit through ancient rose-colored glasses) rather than ignorantly overlooking the importance of the net or labeling it a fad or wose still - the vehicle of Satan.
Also, let's all take joy in the fact that Jerry Falwell has not discovered push technology.
Patron Saint (Score:2)
Al Gore was rejected because he isn't Catholic, and even if he gets elected, he'll only have one miracle to claim. [smile] This really seems like joke material. I had to check the date to make sure it wasn't April 1.
[/OBJOKE]
This really seems like joke material. I had to check the date to make sure it wasn't April 1.
All kidding aside, does the internet really need a patron saint? Maybe so. You see, this may actually help some technophobes overcome their instincitve Luddite fear of the net (remember the kids being "talked to" because they admitted to playing DOOM?). The technology can be seen as being "blessed" as it were, by the Vatican.
For its part, the vatican has been keeping tabs on the internet, with a web presense. Actually, only the Church of Scientology comes to mind as being more net savvy, although the stories associated with the Scientologists are usually negative with respect to the net.
The presense of the Vatican may be even more beneficial, as the internet currently has an image problem (maybe rightfully so) as being awash with pornography, weapons how-to's, and other negative things. Its nice to know there is a major organized religion that may actually champion this technology and help get it seen as acceptable for families, etc.
--
Re: (Score:2)