Digital Identities Now Available 170
Largecranium writes, "I-names, the only globally unique, resolvable namespace in parallel to the DNS system and compatible with OpenID, are being introduced during Digital ID World in Santa Clara. I-Names are only as useful as the services they enable; the services that are available today are interesting but not life-changing. The ones that are coming in the next 6-12 months could change the way people interact online. I-names and their value (today and tomorrow) are casually explained at iwantmynamenow.com." I-names are the lineal descendant of the technology that began as
XNS and continues evolving today as XDI.
excellent! (Score:5, Funny)
Excellent! Because, you know, regular identity theft was just becoming boring.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Big words make BadAnalogyGuy crosseyed (Score:4, Insightful)
Pay $5 to use the internet.
or
Passport.NET for money.
Either way you slice it, it's unnecessary and dumb when the alternative is free and already exists. What is the alternative? Your email address and password. On top of that, you can get virtually any email address you'd like from any number of free online webmail sites like GMale and Hotmail.
What's the point?
Re: (Score:2)
email address and password do not work, unless you want everyone to know (and, why not, use) your password.
email address and a digital certificate are fine, thought. The critical point becomes the CA, but there are good solutions [cacert.org] to that.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Sorry, I just found the typo amusing.
Re: (Score:2)
Like that. Bwahahahaha.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
á = á
é = é
í = í
ó = ó
ú = ú
In portuguese we use those, but they have the inverse function they make the letter sound in a higher tone so 'é' in portuguese sounds like 'bed' while in french it sounds likes "touché".
Re:Big words make BadAnalogyGuy crosseyed (Score:5, Informative)
& aacute ; = á
& eacute ; = é
& iacute ; = í
& oacute ; = ó
& uacute ; = ú
Without the space, obviously.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No it isn't. I may be on your keyboard layout (English UK or English US-International?), but not "on Windows" in general.
On most European keyboards, Alt-Gr-E is the Euro sign.
Re: (Score:2)
in short, it's the Right Alt Key on International Keyboards. Layout shown on that Wikipedia page. (for non-US'ians, US standard keyboards just have identical left and right Alt keys.)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It would be useful to have a single point of contact which doesn't ever have to change. For example, for one reason or another, most people I know seem to change their e-mails or mobile numbers at least once every few years. (PEDANTS: Yes, yes, I know, you've had yours for the last three centuries. Sit down - I said "most people". I'm not talking to you.)
If you could have a system that makes that unnecessary (or at least, painless for all concerned)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Ever as in: as long as you pay $20 every year?
It doesn't make sense in any way, for customers. For people who seek to collect all data about you and are forever after a unique ID (see SSN) to organize their victi^H^H^H^H^Hcustomer database more effectively, it must seem like something really worth looking into. I reckon we are seeing a particularly blatant grab for investors money. More power to the guys who do it: stupid investors need to b
Re: (Score:2)
And how much do (for example) domain-names cost? And are they remotely as useful as this? This is like a meta-domain name, a meta-e-mail address, meta-phone number and meta-postal address all in one.
"It doesn't make sense in any way, for customers."
What, you mean apart from all those ways I listed in my previous post?
Hello-o?
"For people who seek to collect all data about you and are forever after a unique ID (see SSN) to organize their victi^H^H^H^H^Hcustome
Re: (Score:2)
Please explain how a repository of personal contact information that you personally grant access permissions to on a user-by-user basis is a boon to marketing scumbags.
I have a website.
It has a contact form.
Wanna contact me, fill in the form, I gets e-mail and decide what to do with your request.
Costs me less than $20/year, and it works with everybody's existing setup.
Single sign-on? Bah. Either I care about my "identity" on some site and create an account, or I'll just be an anonymous coward (or even creat
Re: (Score:2)
Surely by that metric you can write off the telephone, post, semaphore and morse code as "a boon to marketing scumbags", too then?
In fact, since you can apparently select precisely who gets to see what contact information using i-name, and you can't easily filter who completes a form on your (very public) website, your "solution" is clearly deeply defective compared to the one you're disparaging.
But lets take your assertions one-by-one:
I have a websi
Re: (Score:2)
I'll just point out the obvious ones
1) How would people know my URL? How would they know my "i-Name"? Hey! Same thing! FWIW there already are X.500/LDAP directories on the web (one was even pushed by microsoft and included in NetMeeting) and guess what, no one really thought it convenient enough so that it rose to any sort of popularity.
2) you can't invite all your friends to a party? Why, perhaps they're not all on "i-name".. Perhaps I don't want to receive mass mailing
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry - it's just that people posting "X is crap because I personally don't need it" are a pet hate of mine.
Regarding your other points... good points, every one.
I'm not saying i-name is an unimpeachably good idea, merely that BadAnalogyGuy had yet to voice a good objection. The overwhelming majority of people immediately wrote this off as a scam, apparently without even bothering to consider if it could turn into a useful idea.
You're right - at the moment (lacking wi
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Ever as in: as long as you pay $20 every year?
Just like I pay $35 per year for my domain name. If this becomes widespread (which it probably won't), prices will come down. Plus, these i-names can be hierarchical, like domain names, so you can, for example, register = and then give i-names to all of your family members, and they won't have to pay a thing.
The part of the idea that I'm most skeptical of (well, other than the idea that it will actually be used) is the notion that you can "withdraw" acces
Re: (Score:2)
I mean, who would need your address in the first place that you feel you would want them to 'not know anymore' ?
I suppose you (correct me if I whoosh too
couldn't that also rely on external services ?
(the online store ships with only your digital identity that the delivery service (dhl,
Re: (Score:2)
Good points... I hadn't thought about how useful it would be to have one service provider hand your i-name to another, and for each of them to be able to translate it into the information they need, and *only* the information they need.
Taken to the extreme, you could even put the payment information into the i-name and give the retailer access to that. The retailer wouldn't have access to your shipping address, though. Then the retailer would pass your i-name to the shipper, who could use it to look up
Re: (Score:2)
You pay 35$ a years for you domain name?
WHOOOOOSSSSSHHHH
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your post clearly states: "Just like I pay $35 per year for my domain name" There is nothing about that comment that infers sarcasm or past tense.
Read the sentence that follows that one.
Re: (Score:2)
It may amuse you to notice that Norway (and other scandinavian countries) already has something sorta like this (and did for atleast the last 30 years!).
It works like
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Establishing critical mass for a directory scheme requires a huge amount of work. Establishing critical mass for a proprietary scheme which is intended to displace a large, deployed and reasonably open scheme is doomed from the start.
The XDI scheme is controlled through a series of patents which have been vested in a 'non-profit' entity controlled by the original owners which in turn re-licensed them back to the original owners. This series of moves is
Trust / No Trust (Score:2, Insightful)
But they don't explain anything which might make me consider them to be trustworthy.
This is a skethcy sketch, methinks.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I was looking at OpenID the other day, and if you really want, you can run an OpenID server (there's one written in PHP) on your own webserver.
RegardselFarto
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Slashvert (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Now I really haven't heard about OpenID or I-Names before, can somebody clarify? Is OpenID the (free) specification or standard, and I-Names the (charged) implementation?
And as everybody's already pointing out, whats wrong with good ol' email ID authent
Weakness of email ID (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
YATBFARIADS (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously though, can't we all just use our slashdot ID's? I'd much prefer to be a member of an organisation that looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which i joined.
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder how many low ID's are inactive. I figure we should be hitting user 1000000 soon. That makes me feel elite since I will be in the first 3% of
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
laaaaaameneeeesssss
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Let's just agree that we both need lives.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
1M, come and gone. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
-Rick
Re: (Score:2)
I can see the EBAY add now! (Score:3, Funny)
Starting bid of $500.
-Rick
Re: (Score:2)
New.Net? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
If this takes off remind me to fire up some spare domain name, install a big pile of whatever apps are lying around (forums, chats, IMs, auctions, blogs, networking, all that junk,) name it "teh REAL internets!!!" and then auction off the login names.
Re: (Score:2)
Nevertheless, that doesn't stop it being a good ide, if enough people get on-board.
I have absolutely no doubt there were forums full of people saying exactly the same things about DNS before that took off, too[1]. For-pay? Publically-accessible contact details? Right, like anyone's going to use *that* minority system! Fnord! FNORD!
Not to say it'll definitely take off, but I think the tide of scorn being heaped on it is perhaps a little premature.
[1] Or would hav
I'll keep my analog identity (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
A permanent online identity? (Score:5, Insightful)
The Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] article on i-names says this: "One problem XRIs are designed to solve is persistent addressing -- how to maintain an address that does not need to change no matter how often the contact data for a person or organization changes."
Uhhh... I don't want persistent addressing. I like the idea that if I really wanted to, I could change my e-mail accounts or shut down my web site I have several e-mail accounts for use with different kinds of contacts: some for shopping, some for friends, some for business. I don't mix them. I don't want to mix them.
This also sounds like what Social Security Numbers [wikipedia.org] have become in the U.S.: a catch-all identification number that you are asked for by every bank, employer, insurance company, hospital, car dealership, etc. I don't want to give them all my SSN. It's private, meant for government/tax purposes, but now everyone claims they need it. If I-names become popular, will something similar happen with them? (not trying to sound alarmist, just thinking out loud)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
This is what happens when the government sees itself as an interested party in all financial transactions.
KFG
Re: (Score:2)
I'll agree with you 100%...
Just point to the bit that says you won't be able to register more than one i-name.
Anyone?
Re: (Score:2)
I have several e-mail accounts for use with different kinds of contacts: some for shopping, some for friends, some for business. I don't mix them. I don't want to mix them.
As I understand it, you can do that with i-names. You can create as many names as you want (as many as you want to pay for!) and you can define them to be synonyms, so they link ultimately to the same identification data, but are completely distinct as far as anyone but you (and the registrar) knows. Or you can keep them completely s
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you should re-read the Wikipedia text you quoted. "Does not need to change" is not the same thing as "cannot be changed". If you want to shut down your I-name and start another one, you have the option of doing so. I also don't see any reason why you couldn't open several simulaneous accounts if you wanted to.
Re: (Score:2)
Given a system that provides persistent addressing, it is simple to get non-persistent addressing: simply stop using the persistent name, and get a new persistent name.
Golgolfrincham calling... (Score:4, Funny)
What's that you say? They work for "i-names" now?
"Internet sanitizers" you say? Well.... we're so delighted their safely with you.
(And not us!)
Bad Idea - Reawakens old problems and solves none (Score:4, Informative)
This doesn't go as far toward an actual unique and secure identity as an x.509 certificate, isn't as flexible at handling people who have the same name, has no track record for trust or security, and is controlled by a single organization.
This looks to me like someone's way to make money fast on the interweb by having a signup race for cool names at $5 (then $20) per year each.
We know how well regulated, fair, and efficient the DNS system has been.
Re:Bad Idea - Reawakens old problems and solves no (Score:2)
This doesn't go as far toward an actual unique and secure identity as an x.509 certificate
This idea is orthogonal to the purpose of a certificate. In fact, the ideas are complementary. The purpose of a certificate is to attest to a binding between some identification information and a private key which can be used to identify the holder of that identification information. All of the information in a certificate is visible and static. The (theoretical) purpose of this i-name is to be a link to a bundl
Not at all. x509 does more. (Score:2)
The "Who I am" is more than just my name. It can include my name, address, and other identifying features which make it far superior to simply a name. There is the uniqueid part, and then there is the name part. They are not the same.
What would help much more, is for x.509 to become more widespread. I suspect that eve
Re: (Score:2)
x.509 certificates essentially say "This is who I am, according to this trusted authority. Further, with this identification I've presented to you, you can secure your communication to me."
Other than not mentioning the use of the key pair to encrypt communications, that's exactly what I said. A certificate binds identification information to a key pair. All of the information in the certificate is visible and static, whereas an i-name is dynamic and visibility of the contained information is configurab
Marketingspeak sounds familiar... (Score:2, Insightful)
So... we'll all be browsing on Segways?
What's that you say? Single sign-in? (Score:2)
Identity-Schmydentity (Score:2)
Or, provide value through history (Score:2)
Think about it... anyone can get an eBay ID, but have you seen many spambots with a high feedback score? Whether allowed or not, there's not *that* much benefit in getting a ne
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But even in the eBay example, brick laptopping activity is at least *hindered* by having a reputation system in place, since the "gain reputation" ste
Authentication? Verification? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Advert (Score:3, Insightful)
reasonable idea, just horrible execution (Score:2, Interesting)
The biggest flaw in the proposed scheme (if I understand it correctly) is that the reference you give each organisation is the same
Um. Email? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But what I wanna know is ... (Score:2)
normally, the price is about $20 per year (Score:2, Funny)
Evidently you guys don't have a clue about XRI (Score:2, Informative)
XRI is an open sta
Re: (Score:2)
If you want people to not think it is just a DB record scam, it would be helpful to link to a site that explains what this is good for. Yes, I looked at every link in the header, and sub-links as well, and for the life of me, I can't see why this is useful. The i-names main site meanders around a bit, but mostly says it is a great deal at $5 because next year it will be $20. Whatev
Re: (Score:2)
MyOpenId.com ? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
'Special' characters (Score:2)
Why? Supporting these things is trivial! Trivial!
Whats wrong with .name? (Score:2)
OpenPGP keyid (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Supposedly it gives you a permanent internet identity that could be useful for ID and shipping purposes.
See the article in Wikipedia [wikipedia.org], it has a good explanation and lots of useful links.
They've been trying to get a successful launch of this for some time now and it has so far failed miserably. I'd say it's because many folks on the internet like being anonymous or hiding behind a nym.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Sorry, that was not clear at all, was it?
I used the term nym as shorthand for pseudonym, which is defined here [google.com] .
Somebody famous once said that small towns were wonderful: show up at school with a runny nose and be called sniffy for the rest of your life, fart at a picnic and be known as stinky until death. It's true.
There are a great many reasons to want to keep our names secret on the internet and most of them are logical and non-criminal. People insist on privacy as a defence against spammers, other ma
Re:Could somebody explain it? (Score:4, Funny)
They want your money.
. .
Big. Really big. Huuuuuge.
KFG
One to talk (Score:2)
(Emphasis mine)
Uhm . . . uh . . .
I am overcome with irony.