Water Basketball Robot 88
tisaak writes "Second-year Mechanical Engineering students of the ETH Zurich are required to participate in the so-called "Innovation Project". A subject is assigned each year and 12 teams battle it out to develop a complete product. This year's subject was "Sport and rehabilitation" and "Cleaning". One of the teams managed to build a floating, ball-throwing kind of robot. I think the whole idea is funny and the fact that it has a lot of cables and a processor in it should appeal to the Slashdot public :-) The electronics platform used is called C-Control and is used to control the sensors, the motor and the LCD-Display. The implementation of the game program is nice, considering it is written in a subset of BASIC."
Religion (Score:5, Funny)
That image looks like some kind of ritual, is it some kind of new robot religion? It seems like there is not much time left until the robots will rule.
OSQ (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Religion (Score:1)
I wonder if they can stuff a virgin into that thing.
Seems common (Score:2, Funny)
a good reason (Score:2, Insightful)
You don't program such chips with high-level languages like C & C++. Typically you only use assembly language or other machine-level codes.
The basic-like language (not really a subset, btw) was just provided as a convenience to the programmers.
-D
Re:a good reason (Score:2, Interesting)
Of course, this means that ANY language, high level or not, can be used, provided that you have the appropriate compiler.
Most compilers are BASIC compilers, but some, such as JAL [sourceforge.net] are more Pascal/C-like.
Re:a good reason (Score:1)
What Kind of Robot? (Score:5, Funny)
I don't know why, but I read the headline as White Basketball Robot, and all I thought was, "That's silly... everyone knows White Robots Can't Jump."
Nice (Score:4, Insightful)
Innovation projects sound like a pretty good idea. Too many science courses, including comp-sci, are excessively theory-oriented. Innovation is the lifeblood of science, not the ability to recite a text-book.
Every course should have something along these lines.
Re:Nice (Score:1)
Ya, but where do you think those theories came from? They didn't just drop out of the sky; they were innovated. On the other side of the coin, do you think theory played no role in this innovation contest? Sure, theory isn't everything, but it's also a necessary part of innovation.
Re:Nice (Score:1)
Re:Nice (Score:2)
Re:Clarification (Score:5, Informative)
That's incorrect:
[truebasic.com]John G. Kemeny and Thomas E. Kurtz invented BASIC in 1964 for use at Dartmouth College. They made it freely available to everyone who wanted to learn how to program computers. It soon became a world standard. -TrueBasic.com
You're probably thinking of this:
[microsoft.com]In 1973, Gates entered Harvard University as a freshman, where he lived down the hall from Steve Ballmer, now Microsoft's chief executive officer. While at Harvard, Gates developed a version of the programming language BASIC for the first microcomputer - the MITS Altair. -http://www.microsoft.com/billgates/bio.asp
"Invented" ?!?! (Score:3, Insightful)
Not a bad feat back then, but still, dont over do the credit..
You could build a toilet... (Score:5, Funny)
If it ran Windows, they would just love to make fun of it. [slashdot.org]
Re:You could build a toilet... (Score:1)
Re:You could build a toilet... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:You could build a toilet... (Score:1)
Re:You could build a toilet... (Score:3, Funny)
*crickets chirp*
Thanks alot, you've been great! *exits*
Houston, we have a problem (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Houston, we have a problem (Score:1)
"Houston, we are veering off course because we badly need a frollicking waterball vacation."
Hardware and stuff (Score:2, Funny)
It sure got me wet.
Did they.... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Did they.... (Score:2, Funny)
subset of BASIC (Score:3, Funny)
Re:subset of BASIC (Score:1)
Re:subset of BASIC (Score:1)
Re:subset of BASIC (Score:2, Funny)
"Extraordinarily BASIC"?
Or perhaps just BASICER.
A.
I'm shocked (Score:4, Funny)
What do you think we are, nerds or something?
Re:I'm shocked (Score:1)
Not a lot of processing power used (Score:4, Informative)
If you were looking for the lowest power microcontroller board available, this would be in the running. I guess it was inexpensive -- always a plus for student projects. (My first computer in 1979 could probably thrash this good, except in size.)
Re:Not a lot of processing power used (Score:1)
Re:Not a lot of processing power used (Score:1)
Re:Not a lot of processing power used (Score:2)
Re:Not a lot of processing power used (Score:1)
Yes, that's what I mean: For their course, they are using incredibly primitive resources, perhaps on purpose. Once they can do their project with that, they'll be able to do anything with a modern PIC.
Yeah, you have to program it in assembler
Really? Why?
Re:Not a lot of processing power used (Score:1)
At least their 256 only needs to used the stack and variables.
We'll wonder why... (Score:2, Funny)
mmm.. androids.. (Score:1)
OT (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:OT (Score:3, Funny)
Re:OT (Score:1)
Re:OT (Score:1)
Re:OT (Score:1)
Re:OT (Score:2)
Why bother???
No-one else does...
Thats part of why
Re:OT (Score:1)
Yeah, building robots that kill each other and fight over who owns what.
Re:OT (Score:1)
Re:OT (Score:1)
India will win because they can afford 8 operators per every one of ours.
Re:OT (Score:1)
Hmmm... (Score:2, Interesting)
From previous stories that have appealed to the
Mmmm... (Score:1)
from the cheap humor dept. (Score:3, Funny)
I imagine they only use floating point calculations
Re:from the cheap humor dept. (Score:1)
*Chucks a tomato*
This thing plays water basketball? (Score:2, Funny)
not a lot of cables (Score:2)
I looked at the pics and was deceived by the lack of cables: my very standard PC has more if you open it, and if I consider some of the network cable racks we have down in the computer basement, then the robot definitely doesn't shine in the cable dept...
That said, it's weird, it's quirky, it's useless and that nearly makes it funny
Basketball???? (Score:1)
Searching for Bobby Fischer? (Score:2)
Robot (Score:1)