eBay To Offer Health Insurance 218
Logic Bomb writes "EBay has announced it will be offering group health coverage for "full time eBay merchants". Anyone who grosses over $1000/month in sales -- at least a whopping 80,000 users in good standing -- will be eligible to buy into a typical "employee" health plan. This is a big first in the Internet world. Full details from the LA Times." And the LA Times, trying to cop a pose from the NY Times, reqs a login.
.com health insurance?? (Score:1)
Please, don't let our HR department find out about this.
Flintstone Vitamins and Band-aids for everyone!
Come on dude... (Score:1)
You're in Michigan [usatoday.com] aren't you?
Re:LOL! (Score:2)
Hey (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Hey (Score:1, Troll)
ass.
Re:Hey (Score:2)
like i said. ass.
Re:Hey (Score:1)
Re:Hey (Score:2, Funny)
Disclaimer: OSDN cash cannot be used at the following sites: slashdot.org, freshmeat.net, thinkgeek.com, sourceforge.net or any other site owned by VA Software. Offer not valid in Tennessee, or any other place where Paul Anka makes guarantees
Re:Hey (Score:4, Informative)
Legalities? (Score:1)
Does eBay pay those who auction their goods? Obviously the auctioners make money for eBay, but what are the direct (from eBay) rewards to the seller?
Re:Legalities? (Score:2)
Many companies have independent contractors that are not employees, but qualify for benefits. You see this a lot in insurance sales, consulting agencies, legal firms, etc. I think this is wonderful for eBay [ebay.com] to not only be this creative, but also to help maintain their position as the best
Re:Legalities? (Score:1)
Or am I completely missing the point. Could I just simply start calling the users of www.dmarien.com my employee's?
.com users equal to employees? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Legalities? (Score:1)
Other industries like this include real estate - most realtors don't get paid salary, only commission. But they also can get insurance from their "employer", if it's offered.
This doesn't seem much different.
Re:Legalities? (Score:2)
No employment is necessary. It's a group policy. The group is eBay sellers who sell more than $1000 a month, that's all. It is not unusual to have a group policy that is not employment-related.
What expense do you think eBay is writing off? I don't see anything in the article that suggests that eBay is paying any part of the premium for the insurance
Re:Legalities? (Score:2, Interesting)
Ebay to Insurance company: "We have the names and addresses of 80,000+ people that spend so much time on our site, they probably don't have a real job or benefits."
Insurance Company to Ebay: "Cool. We'll call them a group and give you 5% of the premiums that they pay for the first 5 years"
Next Step. Big announcement.
Starting bid: $1.00 (Score:5, Funny)
Will they allow you to give feedback to health providers in your area?
Can you pay with PayPal?
Will you be able to set up a doctor's appointment for organ removal and simultaneously list the spare kidney for sale?
Re: not but the tools are available (Score:5, Funny)
I find that prospect likely. Afterall, Ebay does provide you with the necessary (unused) tools [ebay.com].
Re:Starting bid: $1.00 (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Starting bid: $1.00 (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Starting bid: $1.00 (Score:2)
what happens if? (Score:4, Funny)
Who said the .boom was entirely over? (Score:5, Insightful)
Can you trust it? (Score:1)
I know that the chances of ebay going under are miniscule, but I wouldn't risk paying into it to have it fold and be left empty handed.
Re:Can you trust it? (Score:1)
>miniscule, but I wouldn't risk paying into it to
>have it fold and be left empty handed.
Empty-handed? You pay for benefits as you get them. So, if eBay goes under, you stop paying for health insurance, you stop receiving health insurance. It works the same way with any employer...it's not as though ebay is having you to buy stock in the company as part of your retirement fund.
Health care is not as expensive as you think (Score:2)
I commented "it must stink paying for your own health coverage"- His response was that Health care coverage is nice, but not as expensive as everyone makes it seem. Actually the biggest expenses are that vacations are unpaid, and education costs are solely your own.
Insurance companies are always looking to make money and I'm sure they give volume discounts, just like everybody else! (who actually pays $1.50 for a resistor at radio shack?)
Re:Can you trust it? (Score:1, Interesting)
On another note, I didn't realize there were that many people who made ebay (more or less) a full time job. I imagine someone who invests that much into ebay is more tolerant of risk than most people (same could be said of all self-employed).
It's only the beginning... (Score:2, Funny)
heh.. (Score:1)
what a way to live!
Re:heh.. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:heh.. (Score:2)
eBay, on the other hand, allows someone to sell an endless variety of items from a central site that's guaranteed to get more potential buyers viewing a given listing than almost any other method.
People can and do make livings off eBay. I've seen these folks interviewed on the news before. Typically, they specialize in some sort of collectible or craft; items that have very high profit margins and low production costs.
So no, you probably won't have much of a life if you try to live off of selling used computers on eBay... If you build you own unique furniture though, you just might have something.
eBay and health insurance coverage (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:eBay and health insurance coverage (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:eBay and health insurance coverage (Score:1)
Re:eBay and health insurance coverage (Score:1)
Re:eBay and health insurance coverage (Score:3, Insightful)
I've had no problem selling stuff on eBay - If you list it right, it gets found in a search along with all the other stuff.
I like the large businesses because there are some items I know I'm always going to be able to find cheap on eBay. (Cornelius kegs for homebrewing, a top for the convertible I'm planning on buying, cell phone faceplates, etc.)
Re:eBay and health insurance coverage (Score:2, Informative)
More sites to follow suit? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:More sites to follow suit? (Score:1)
and my (very) RSI!
Re:More sites to follow suit? (Score:2)
Don't listen guys... (Score:4, Funny)
Numbers talk.. (Score:3, Interesting)
An insurance company is out to make money, just like you and me, who get a job to make money (or sell things on eBay in this case.) So, if you offer them a large customer base, 80,000 people, then that's a big enough market you start to drop your prices signifigantely.
This will be an interesting precident to set in the marketplace of health insurance. If it goes through and works,
Whose going to manage these benefits? Will eBay have a new department for assisting their people with benefit claims?
Hmm...imagine if http://www.yahoo.com/ or http://www.msn.com/ were able to follow suit and offer health insurance. Anyone else think there's a web-organization that can claim more members?
Re:Numbers talk.. (Score:1)
Going by your logic, there's no way I'm paying to be in a health gambling pool with guys who live off pizza and high-caffeine drinks, in the dark, smoking heavily and sitting down all day (and night)...
Yahoo/MSN - Not gonna happen. (Score:5, Insightful)
eBay takes a commission from every sale - So those sellers are far, far beyond even paying customers at many sites as far as the revenue they bring into the company.
Meanwhile, Yahoo and MSN are free services, or if they charge, they don't charge nearly as much as the amounts of commissions eBay skims from the qualifying classes of sellers.
Re:Numbers talk.. (Score:3, Insightful)
No -- like in any job in the US with a group health plan, you deal with the insurance company providing the coverage and not your employer.
Re:Numbers talk.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Yup. Admittedly, not all of the people eligible will opt for this insurance -- either they have their own insurance already and eBay's offering isn't better, or they apply and the insurer turns them down due to liability issues (this is why it's critical to always have health insurance in the US -- once you are uninsured for 6 months you can be declined for just about any reason... or you can be insured and "preexisting conditions" will simply be declined coverage).
This will be an interesting precident to set in the marketplace of health insurance
Yup... to call a seller an employee of eBay is something of a stretch, but apparantly they have found an insurer who is willing to try. Kudos. And they're willing to test some very murky legal waters here -- once you offer health insurance for these pseudo-employees, you may discover that the federal government is going to start expecting more from you -- even if it's just forms stating that these people are contractors and that you aren't responible for their FICA and Federal taxes. What about FMLA? What about disability? There's a lot more here than meets the eye in my opinion.
Whose going to manage these benefits? Will eBay have a new department for assisting their people with benefit claims?
In theory, HR does this. If eBay has any clue, however, they'll be using a 3rd party administration service to provide these benefits. They're the ones that actually handle the interface between employees and the health plan -- all your HR does is forward them whatever you hand HR. These are popular nowadays because they significantly reduce the paperwork that HR has to deal with.
Anyone else think there's a web-organization that can claim more members?
That's easy. AOL.
Re:Numbers talk.. (Score:1)
That's easy. AOL.
A very good point! But, the question is, how does one get them to be considered pseudo-employee's, opposed to customers of a service? I suspect that's the hook that eBay is using.
I have to admit, this whole idea sounds pretty interesting to me. Then again, I have a so-so health insurance company, from my own mickey-mouse company, which admittedly plays half of the monthly premiums. Certainly all this is better than a sharp stick in the eye (which would require I go to the doctor, of course). However, I know that the total cost of my plan is the same as if I was just this single guy who walked in off the street. (I just pay half since the company pays the other half.)
I suspect that eBay won't be picking up any of the slack for premiums on this health insurance, so people might find it's not the bargin that they expect for such a potentially large user base. If anyone fits into the 80,000 user-base that eBay is talking about, I'm sure it'd be elightening to know what their potential premiums are.
Re:Numbers talk.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Numbers talk.. (Score:2)
Re:Numbers talk.. (Score:2, Interesting)
insurance companies lose money on insurance, they know this, they deal with this, its not a real problem.
what they do make money on is investments
so you ask, then why do they sell insurance?
well then need to get capital from somewhere before they invest, dont they?
-rev
Re:Numbers talk.. (Score:5, Informative)
Whose going to manage these benefits? Will eBay have a new department for assisting their people with benefit claims?
What an insurer needs in order to spread risk is a large pool of people selected for some criteria not related to their health/propensity to make claims. The healthy group members pay and don't claim, while the unhealthy members claim a lot more than they pay, and the system works. Traditionally, such groups have been {all employees of a given company}. EBay is a good candidate for a new type of group. What will not work is any internet community that is self-selecting on the basis of wanting health insurance. Such groups will contain too high a percentage of unhealthy people.
EBay will be pretty limited as a precedent, I think. EBay's members have to really commit to EBay (be high volume sellers) to get covered. It's not as easy as saying, "I think I'll switch ISPs to Earthlink because I like the health plan."
On another note, it's not trivial to offer health insurance to a national group. Most health insurers have regional networks of physicians and services. (This is partly because insurance is licensed on a state by state basis.) Some few have enough regional networks to be effectively national, but you can bet that people outside population centers are going to find they have somewhat limited choices when it comes to selecting physicians near them. EBay sellers have got to be just about the most geographically diverse insurance group ever attempted. Many, many employers have one or a few locations, e.g. a plant. EBay users don't have any locations/concentrations other than the fact that more of them will be found in cities because that's where the people are.
Still and all, more power to 'em, I say.
Re:Numbers talk.. (Score:4, Funny)
last thing I need next time I'm in a hospital is some troll adding "goatse" to the doctors "to do" list.
ow.
unless the slashdot insurance offered protection from robots. that's the kinda insurance you can live with!
LA Times (Score:1, Flamebait)
And the LA Times, trying to cop a pose from the NY Times, reqs a login.
Would you rather they post a policy against linking directly to their articles?
I bid (Score:2, Funny)
Action closes 29/6/2002
Re:I bid (Score:1)
No Reg Copy of Story (Score:4, Informative)
This is so... (Score:2)
I can see it now. So many more people will now be hawking their wares on E-Bay in a desperate attempt to qualify for health insurance. The volume goes up. the quality goes down...
Oh wait, That's already happened.
What's their hidden agenda... (Score:1)
My question is 'why is ebay doing this?' I mean it's not like they really give a damn about anyone but themselves. So the thing is what's in it for them? Obviously offering benefits is a pain, but they still are choosing to do it. I wonder why....
Re: (Score:2)
Re:What's their hidden agenda... (Score:2)
There's a pretty simple profit motive here, too. Being known as the biggest and best doesn't mean you're done. Being the biggest and best is a hard spot to keep in most fields, and a move like this increases the incentive to sell on eBay, particularly when other companies like Yahoo! are trying to get a sizable percentage of the online auction market.
So the motive is: In order to attract sales, one must attract sellers.
Even top dog needs to work to stay that way.
Re:What's their hidden agenda... (Score:3, Insightful)
It may seem like 1K/month in sales is a lot but compared to the liquidators who sell there, it isn't. eBay needs those 80,000 Power Sellers to be able to keep selling too.
My guess is that this arrangement won't cost eBay much, if any, money from their own pocket. I saw no mention that they are going to co-pay for the insurance. But, they've made it possible for the full-time eBay dealer to get decent group insurance. Not a bad incentive to stay with eBay.
New urban legends!!! (Score:5, Funny)
bad feedback = cancelled benefits? (Score:2)
Re:bad feedback = cancelled benefits? (Score:2)
Only 42,920,000 left to go (Score:1)
Of course, th 43 million without health insurance doesn't include those that are under insured.
It'll be interesting if this plan doesn't add to that larger number.
However, from a larger picture, it is good to see the new internet companies continuing to innovate and think outside the box. Competitive edge and something akin to a social-conscience.
HMO's are cheap (Score:2, Informative)
Plus you don't need to be in good standing with ebay to use it.
"oh no sir, I'm sorry, we can't operate until you take the link to your webstore off your auction pages"
Re:HMO's are cheap (Score:4, Informative)
Re:HMO's are cheap (Score:4, Informative)
It is available for uninsured working individuals, sole proprietors, and small buisness owners. They each have their own rules. However, the prices are in the 180-220
Re:HMO's are cheap (Score:3, Insightful)
Insurance companies will deny coverage to individuals, or will deny coverage for preexisting conditions, for the flimsiest of reasons. Also, there is no federal law preventing them from cancelling your insurance, or raising the rates through the roof if you get sick.
This same "medical underwriting" applies to small businesses and associations.
In the US, if you don't have a job, you run a real chance of losing everything in order to pay for a medical event. You can always get the treatment - you just may end up broke to get it.
All of the federal protections on health insurance is offered only to people covered by group insurance (companies, etc.) and not to individuals.
Oh, BTW, the insurance companies don't do this just because they are evil predators. They know that if they offer insurance without conditions, too many people will wait until they get sick, or at least until they get old, before applying. This negates the "share the risk" aspect of insurance. OTOH Company insurance, which is virtually forced on all employees, produces a crop of young and healthy people to pay the expenses for us older folks.
Some states have pools from which you can buy insurance regardless of your medical status. Unfortunately, these are almost impossible to get into, or are extremely expensive. And given the previous paragraph, you can see why this is not an ultimate solution.
Re:HMO's are cheap (Score:3, Insightful)
No head-shrinkers (Score:2)
Ehm, just a question (Score:2)
And no, they would not big higher than the previous one, but lower... ^_~
Re:Ehm, just a question (Score:2)
Bid : $200
(anaesthetic extra )
.Boom 2.0 (Score:4, Insightful)
Buying your couch online is out...earth to owner, couches cost A LOT more to ship than books, and people want to sit in them first. Commerce on the web that makes sense is in. eBay is probably the first in the second stream of successful internet companies to start gaining attention.
Can't wait to see more real profits from the internet...
-Pete
Re:.Boom 2.0 (Score:2)
Once again the /. editing calls attention to itsel (Score:3, Insightful)
the LA Times, trying to cop a pose from the NY Times, reqs a login.
I found myself asking these questions:
In the end, I'm left with the impression that this is just a young kid editing a web page who wants to use a clever turn of phrase he heard. It adds nothing to the story; it takes away much.
Re:Once again the /. editing calls attention to it (Score:3, Interesting)
I would waste more time trying to load a slashdotted page than reading a sentence fragment and deciding that since I'm not going to register anyway I might as well just go to the comments and hope someone has whored the story.
I'm of mixed opinion on the reference. On one hand, it's childish and, as you indicated, is trying to be "hip". On the other hand, I'd rather have bad personality than none at all. I view slashdot as a community, not a newsfeed. If I want a newsfeed, I can check out Newsforge or C|Net or CNN's Tech section and get it there. I come to Slashdot because of the (sometimes) insightful commentary coming from people who know more than I do about a subject, and the occasional amusement from some troll who has been modded up. Sense of aquaitance is important. I don't want hemos and cmdtaco and whoever aloof from Slashdot's user base (even though they sometimes seem to be from themselves) - the site looses a lot of its appeal because it becomes just another newsfeed I'll check a few times a day.
Re:Once again the /. editing calls attention to... (Score:2)
Why do I need to be told a login is required? Won't I find that out soon enough?
Saves me a wasted click. Why should I go to the LA Times' site, and then be turned away due to a stupid 'free registration' policy? Wouldn't you want to know if a store is open or closed before you leave your house and head for it?
Why reference the NYTimes?
You must be new around here. The NYT's useless policy has been mentioned many times, and people have implemented [majcher.com] trivial workarounds. And LAT has switched to this 'free registration' thing recently.
What's this "coping a pose" reference?
What are you, a prude?
Is the LATimes copying from the NYTimes...
Seeing that NYT has had this 'free registration' BS for years, and LAT just started doing this, you make the call. (I hope 'BS' is not too hip for you...)
Learn to read. The italics stuff is that submitted by the submitter; the non-italics text is the editor's opinion/remarks . It is plain as daylight. Maybe you should lurk here longer?
Oh, and by the way: welcome to Slashdot! Next time, pick a name and post using that name.
Re:Once again the /. editing calls attention to it (Score:2)
2:Yes.
3:Yes.
4:Yes (not the other way around).
5:No.
6:That's what the different fonts are for. You'll get used to it if you hang around here for a while.
I'm left with the impression that this is just a young kid editing a web page
Welcome to CmdrTaco, Hemos, and CowboyNeil's clubhouse
-
Not Employees (Score:2, Informative)
Chamber of Commerce plans do the same thing for small businesses. The group buying power is what helps lower the rates.
So this insurance still ends up costing the Power Sellers more per month than most plans they would get as employees, because ebay isn't pitching in the 50-70% that many employers do.
Side effect: Now something else the IRS can use... (Score:5, Insightful)
Quality Health insurance? (Score:2)
TRADER: Honestly, how can you tell if you have health insurance that is good through eBay?
eBay SUPPORT: There is a BIG GOLD STAR next to their name.
TRADER: Oh. Okay... cool. Fine by me.
I've already got eBay health coverage... (Score:1)
I'm just waiting (Score:4, Funny)
L.A. Times? (Score:5, Informative)
Read about it on CNET without the hassle. [com.com]
Health Insurance for Open Source Developers? (Score:2, Insightful)
I could use it...
Insurance depends on feedback?!?! (Score:3, Interesting)
Lowest Bidder (Score:2)
- Serge Wroclawski
NOT EMPLOYEES! (Score:5, Informative)
This is simply a group policy, like those you can get thru the National Association of the Self-Employed, or dozens of other small-business and "group" organizations.
All you need for group discounts is a large group -- they don't have to be co-workers. E-Bay isn't contributing to the funds.
Disability (Score:2)
Slashdot Health Insurance!!! (Score:3, Interesting)
Although we would never find an underwriter that would insure this risk pool for capal tunnel and eyestrain related maladies.
why the mandatory login? my theory... (Score:2, Insightful)
I still hate it, and so should you, but I understand their logic.
This is precisely what we need for open source (Score:2, Interesting)
Now create a shell company, sorta like ebay, whose job is the following: (a) provide hosting, and company management tools to all these folks
(b) provide visibility, branding, and marketing (c) co-ordinate the release of the distribution (d) provide an internal market for equity redistribution and (e) provide benefits to participants as ebay is.
The app makers get contributed on a per sale royalty basis. The consultants earn their compensation on their gigs. Each has a certain equity in the company, and contributes a certain portion of revenues ( the ebay percentage) into this shell company.
The issue today as far as open source is concened from a business model perspective is, for example, that the Ximian developers see no monetary incentive from Red Hat's bundling of Evolution. From a free software perspective itself, this would be ok as I am sure Red Hat contributes bug reports, people, etc. But from a business model perspective this fails because the market is not so large, and each linux company is loosing money by doing stuff like packaging inhouse where they could eliminate duplication by outsourcing.
Why not utilize a monetary model which provides benefits to the developers/packagers/integrators who put in the work in the first place? Instead we are using traditional business models in small markets and then giving the value to shareholders who couldnt care a damn. The stock markets can come later, lets give all them creative people a boost first, so that they dont have to become employees of even linux companies who all go after the same market with the same tactic..anyone think all will survive? Lets create a system where developers have the freedom to do what they love, with atleast some of the financial issues for them taken care of.
Check out the links I put up at 3point0.nareau.com if you care..Email me at tig@nareau.com to discuss more if you find this notion interesting..
Great! (Score:2)
Re:erm.... (Score:2)
Um. This is part of their program to help out the little guy. Your sense of scale is a little off here. The "big guys" here are Disney and IBM.
Do you really think someone who's making $1000 a month gross is not a little guy?
Re:erm.... (Score:2)
It's not living "the American dream" (ahem), but it's low-impact and quite comfortable. The best part of living on the cheap is not slaving away in an office for 40+ hours a week.
Re:Ebay is no longer worth it (Score:4, Insightful)
They started a medium that turned out to be wildly popular, and I'm sure that [insert company name here] noticed that a lot of people were turning to eBay to buy the same products. Who can blame them (the company) for auctioning directly on eBay also?
What's eBay supposed to do? Only allow individuals? Hah! I'm sure they have no plans to kill half of their revenue stream anytime in the near future. I say bravo to eBay for proving that it is possible to be profitable on the Internet.
Re:Ebay is no longer worth it (Score:2)
In which case they will see their revenue dry up very quickly as more and more people notice that e-Bay "deals" tend to cost them more in terms of price paid and the risk inherent in online trading. We'll see how long before former e-Bay addicts start leaving the service in droves. There are already alternative bidding sites that don't let spammers in.
Re:Ebay is no longer worth it (Score:2)
Re:I still don't understand insurance pools... (Score:2, Insightful)
First of all, you don't have to be an employer to get group insurance rates. All that you have to have is a group of people who are organized for some purpose OTHER THAN purchasing insurance. Most commonly, this is a group of people who work for a particular employer. However, there are other groups that offer group insurance (trade associations, unions, chambers of commerce).
The reason for the organization requirement is because of ADVERSE SELECTION. Adverse selection is where a person purchases insurance because he or she knows that it will be needed in the near future (bad health, pending surgery, etc). Insurance companies hate this because if too many people do this, they will go out of business and nobody will get insurance. This is why companies give you medical exams, don't cover pre-existing conditions, etc when buying an individual insurance policy.
The advantage of group insurance is that because entry into the group is limited to certain people, it is less likely that adverse selection will occur. Because people become members of the group for a reason not having anything to do with buying insurance, you probably won't get people joining just to get the health benefits. Usually you don't have to submit to a health exam to get group insurance. Also, pre-existing conditions are usually covered (with possible a short waiting period). If eBay opened the group membership to everyone, then membership would likely get flooded with sick people looking for the insurance benefits. This would drive up the costs of offering the insurance, and the insurer would probably cancel the policy (or increase the premium rates to much higher levels).
There are other things that insurers do to protect themselves from adverse selection. Group policies often have minimum enrollment requirements. The plan sponsor has to guarantee that a certain percentage of members gets the policy. This is to prevent the case where only the "sick" people in the group sign up. They want to make sure that the people who sign up are a good representative sample of the group. They also have enrollment periods where members can only sign up for the policy during a particular time period. Again, this prevents people from signing up just as they are entering the operating room. Finally, insurers adjust the group premiums from year to year, based upon the claim amount incurred by the group. This allows them to modify the premium if the group turns out to be less healthy than they originally thought.
One of the arguments in favor of nationalized health care is that everybody would be part of one big "group", so there will be maximum risk sharing. Thus, costs would be divided up evenly, as you say. Of course, given the business and political climate in the U.S., it isn't likely to happen any time soon!