Feds to Publish Public Comments on MS Settlement 365
Silas writes: "This AP Article notes that the government is going to be releasing the comments submitted by the public on the Microsoft anti-trust case. Highlight: 'Overall, the department said it received about 7,500 comments from people in favor of the settlement reached by the federal government and nine states, while 15,000 opposed it. Another 7,000 comments were dismissed as opinion, like "I hate Microsoft."' Apparently they have to publish and respond to each one." CNN is carrying the AP wire story as well.
Bill gets a new hat! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Bill gets a new hat! (Score:2)
he needs the rest of the outfit (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Bill gets a new hat! (Score:2)
That's it? (Score:5, Funny)
Come on, guys, where is your activistic spirit?
Re:That's it? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:That's it? (Score:3, Funny)
My guess is that the majority of Windows users were too busy running ScanDisk on their crashed systems, while the "angry Linux zealots" were unhampered by technical difficulties and thusly had a lot more free time.
Re:That's it? (Score:2, Troll)
Are you kidding me? I've been trying to get my computer to print for over a week. Stupid lpr.
Re:That's it? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:That's it? (Score:2)
It seems to me that the volume of letters shouldn't be considered much more than an interesting statistic. It's a actual quality of the arguments that should count, whether there were 15,000 or 15.
Re:That's it? (Score:2)
Re:That's it? (Score:2, Interesting)
Clearly, it shows the Government, Microsoft and the world and the people are against the Microsoft Settlement.
Re:That's it? (Score:5, Insightful)
We probably sent the 7,000 opinions..
Re:That's it? (Score:5, Interesting)
It's a sad state of affairs when even the trolls don't live up to their potential.
On a more serious note, what do you expect? /. can't even organize a boycott of DVDs. Hell, we even get frontpage stories about the latest anime DVDs to come out. You have a majority here that when you take an activist stand, like say voting for Nader, tell you you wasted your vote even when said critic admits to not voting at all.
Most of the /. crowd and even me to a shameful degree don't have an activist bone in their body. We're opinionated but not motivated and definately not inconvenienced enough to "get religion." The fact is we're too diverse of group to all congregate on any real issue. Having an interest in technology is simply not encompassing enough to organize this group.
Re:That's it? (Score:5, Insightful)
I wrote a 4 page letter expressing my view on the Microsoft case, (I did use the phrase "Microsoft sucks" followed by "the life out of the computer industry"). I did not use a template, or fire off a quick one liner.
I wrote my senators about the case.
I wrote my senators about the DeCSS case.
I wrote them about the passage of the DMCA.
SHAME on anyone here who has ever had to reinstall Windows just because "the registry got messed up" - and did not voice their opinion on this case. Shame on you.
Re:That's it? (Score:2)
I wrote my congressman about Sklyarov, Felten and the DMCA.
I spoke to him (very briefly) after he gave a talk at my synagogue.
Re:That's it? (OT) (Score:3, Informative)
Hell, we even get frontpage stories about the latest anime DVDs to come out.
Why should we boycott anime DVDs? Most of the publishers aren't members of the MPAA, and don't pay DVD CCA dues. (The exception being Manga, who generally carries only the really bad stuff anyway) Many anime DVDs don't even use macrovision or encryption, and the North American releases generally aren't region-coded.
I'd say these are the kinds of DVDs we should be buying, to show that we're willing to support companies that don't place ludicrous restrictions on their "intellectual property".
Thank god it was only 15,000! (Score:2, Insightful)
I was one of the few... (Score:2)
Why? Because as so often been pointed out on here, a physical manifestation of opinion is more likely to get attention and a response. I'm looking forward to receiving it, by US mail and come what may, a copy of the letter and the response will be family artifacts.
It feels good to participate in a democracy. I encourage it.
The Mass listening problem (Score:5, Insightful)
I am not surprised at the breakdown of the messages, except that the number of messages rejected as 'opinion' (7,000) sounds rather low if anything. The number of form letters (3,000)also sounds like it on the low side.
I doubt that anyone in the administrationis going to treat the messages as 'votes' [what start a lawsuit to stop them being counted? - Ed]. The number of messages on both sides will have been inflated by 'astroturf' (fake grass roots) campaigns by Microsoft, Sun, AOL etc. Fortunately messages of that type tend to be easier to spot than the people who purchase the campaigns think.
The bulk of the messages will simply repeat each other and standard positions fed to people by the media (including slashdot). I suspect that the 48 'substantive' comments are mainly the briefs written by industry lawyers to support one party or another. I strongly suspect however that it is the case that practically every idea expressed in the 22,000 contributions is covered in the 48 'substantive' contributions. Identifying a small number of contributions that put all the important issues well is a tremendous service to people trying to read the materials.
Taking the feedback as email will have helped sorting to an enormous degree. But a structured forum with some form of moderation could have helped the feedback further, collapsing repetative positions down to one instance and such. The moderation need not have been on the slashdot model in which there is a single pool of moderators, there could be twin panels of moderators representing each side. After all posting troll comments and pornography would do nothing for either side unless they wanted to discredit the dabate.
Finally the cost of publication at $400 a page does not seem unreasonable, it is roughly equivalent to the cost of printing and distributing about 1,000 copies. That is not much more than one per senator, congressman, state AG, party affected and news organization.
15,000 that were not trolls, etc (Score:4, Interesting)
Then there were the "me too"s
So you actually had a decnt chance of being included in the comment base if you took the time to actually write an intelligent thoughtful comment. Form letters were tossed as obvious attempts to flood the channel.
It probably winds up being similar to the number of comments in any number of Slash articles, and reading everything above 0.
!5,000 submittals that were not trolls, flamebait, etc, and which actually had some content is probably not that bad.
Heck, you could go for months here at slash before you hit that many.
Just taker a look at alterslash [alterslash.org]
Re:That's it? (Score:2)
I suspect the 7,000 "I hate Microsoft" comments were from slashdotters as well. So that's really 22,000 responses from here
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Inquiring minds would like to know... (Score:4, Redundant)
And...
How many of the 7,000 "I hate microsoft" comments came from
Anyone?
:)
Re:Inquiring minds would like to know... (Score:4, Insightful)
I think the process that they used to weed out the "useless" content clearly indicates that they are not in the slightest concerned with majority opinion, but are more interested in the actual content of opinions. Of course, it's also possible that it's just a formality. Hopefully the fact that 2/3 of the opinions are dissenting will make them think a bit.
Re:Inquiring minds would like to know... (Score:2, Insightful)
You say that like it's a bad thing!
Keep this in mind: do you give more weight to posts that contain an thoughtful arguement, or to a bunch of "me too" posts?
Also, I think you are confusing a legal determination from an election. The latter is a case where noone cares why someone favors one side or another, simply how many favorred a given side.
The legal detemriantion, however, looks to see why it is felt an action would be in violation of laws on the books, what the impact would be on affected groups (in this case, consumers, etc.). Quality over quantity matters.
Re:Inquiring minds would like to know... (Score:3, Insightful)
I agree with you. I didn't mean to say it that way, but that's how it came out. I think the purpose was to examine the content all along, but I believe there are a lot of disappointed petition signers out there who would have taken the time and thought to submit their own opinions if they had realized how the information was to be handled. Also, my guess is that these rules are clearly spelled out somewhere, but nobody bothered to check.
Re:Inquiring minds would like to know... (Score:2)
Re:Inquiring minds would like to know... (Score:2)
Why does it have to be "came from Microsoft". There must be some Windows lovers out there. Anyone?
Re:Inquiring minds would like to know... (Score:2)
I think the pro-Microsoft people out there realize that they have nothing to fear.
When, in 5 years, Microsoft is ordered to pay a $10 fine, the pro-Microsoft people will be glad they didn't waste 30 minutes coming up with a coherent sentence supporting Microsoft.
Re:Inquiring minds would like to know... (Score:2)
One needs only look at examples from Team OS/2 in the Infoworld 1996 scandal, and the astroturfing from Kevin Reichard over at linuxtoday.com.
Re:Inquiring minds would like to know... (Score:3, Funny)
one of the cdroms (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:one of the cdroms (Score:2)
What 'reasons' are the most popular.
And all other sorts of statitics.
here's the full report... (Score:4, Informative)
Veddy Interesting... (Score:4, Funny)
I can just see it...
<<dream sequence>>
M$: "And as the people of the united states have so eloquently spoken and made themselves clear on this matter, we at Microsoft would like to offer all of our products as Open Source and further, to address the financial hardships suffered by users of our non-secure products and those driven from business by our monopolistic practices, we offer to pay a find of $100 billion dollars, which we would prefer the government invest in Open Source initiatives."
DoJ: "Which still isn't good enough for us at the Justice Department, and we'd like to place Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer and other top Microsoft executives responsible, in irons and secure in the basement of a dairy barn for five years, or until they all go insane, whichever comes first."
M$: "Fair enough."
<<exit dream sequence>>
Whoa! I must have been dreaming!
Outsiders (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Outsiders (Score:3, Interesting)
Besides, other countries can, and have, launched their own suits against Microsoft. I'm sure many of them would be offended if I suggested that I as an American should be able to critique and influence their decision.
Re:Outsiders (Score:4, Informative)
Now, as to if you think that people from other countries should weigh in or not, well, that's a good point. But apparently DOJ really was looking for a broad review & reaction to this settlement more than a specificly US reaction. It seems a little odd to me, but that's what I was told.
Mark
Re:Outsiders (Score:2)
Well -why does it seem odd?
Microsoft policy is written in Redmond and from there disseminated _globally_ with only minor tweaks to "handle" local market differences. I see this as the US Fed *correctly* (!) understanding that US consumers and businesses interest is very deeply tied into global business practices. As such, asking for comment from all corners of the globe will present a much more accurate picture of the REAL Microsoft, and as such present an opportunity to lay just the right amount of "smack down" to Bill and Co.
I wonder... (Score:3, Funny)
I wonder how many of the responses were thrown out because they were moderated to "-1 Troll"?
And how many just said "First post"?
Cheers,
Ethelred
A pattern! (Score:5, Informative)
15000 against
7000 trolls
That's 1:2:1, which tends to be about the same ratio seen in a slashdot thread!
The real world imitating slashdot, or vice versa?
You forgot to mention (Score:2)
Re:A pattern! (Score:3, Funny)
Horror:
Discovering after years that the rest of the world really is just like SlashDot.
Form Letters (Score:2, Insightful)
"About 2,800 of the comments were form letters - both pro- and anti-Microsoft groups offered their supporters a way to sign on to a prewritten document."
Wonder why the DoJ didn't tell us how those 2,800 form letters were divided between pro- and anti-Microsoft. Perhaps the number of genuine Microsoft "supporters" is lower than even the paltry 7,500 cited in the article....
Just a thought, I could be mistaken....
Pusblishing the comments (Score:3, Offtopic)
The story says they are required to publish the comments. Due to the sheer volume, this "will cost about $4 million and cover 10,000 pages". All I have to say is: Yeesh!.
Perhaps it's time to send in another letter urging them to pursue the option to publish online and on CD-ROM in order to fulfil this obligation.
It seems a bit excessive to spend $4 million and countless trees to publish the roughly 3000 substantive messages received out of the 30000 total messages.
And does the guy that mailed the ASCII goatse.cx message really need to be published in a federal registry?
Re:Pusblishing the comments (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Pusblishing the comments (Score:2)
Re:Pusblishing the comments (Score:2)
Re:Pusblishing the comments (Score:3, Insightful)
I disagree. I think that given the interests of those who might want to have a copy of this publication, the percentage interested in CDROM or Web access will probably be much higher than 10%.
Re:Pusblishing the comments (Score:2)
90% of all requests can't be denied.
Actually, no requests can be denied.
But if you read the full summary [usdoj.gov] from the DoJ, somewhere in there it will mention that petitioners must pay for the costs of materials (though not the work) in answering a Freedom of Information Act request.
If this were not the case, people could theoretically take down the government simply through making it provide piles of paper for them.
Re:Pusblishing the comments (Score:2)
Re:Pusblishing the comments (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Pusblishing the comments (Score:2)
Re:Pusblishing the comments (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Pusblishing the comments (Score:2, Informative)
Numbers could be misleading... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Numbers could be misleading... (Score:2)
'Overall, only a tenth of the more than 30,000 messages were classified by the department as "containing a degree of detailed substance."'
Nowhere does it say that the substantive were for or against the settlement.
Re:Numbers could be misleading... (Score:2)
Re:Numbers could be misleading... (Score:2)
Whoops, mine was probably a so-called 'Off-Topic' (Score:2, Funny)
Oh well, hopefully this settlement will be rejected and we all get another chance!
Must remember to talk about the settlement, must remember to talk about the settlement......
Waiting for the other shoe to drop... (Score:2, Funny)
What to do with all those comments... (Score:2)
Astroturfing? (Score:2, Interesting)
I wonder what percentage of the 7500 in favor of the settlement are Microsoft employees' sisters, or work at companies with Microsoft contracts, or were somehow contacted by Microsoft PR hacks and "encouraged" to write letters. It'd be hilarious to find that 6000 of the letters were all written by some poor intern at Microsoft, using names from the phone book.
Re:Astroturfing? (Score:2)
Re:Astroturfing? (Score:3, Interesting)
In fact, I really hope that they don't find out who I work for, because my company has a relationship with Microsoft (as any software company in today's world really must, if they're to have any chance of long-term surival). They might think that my opinion reflects poorly on my employer.
Just great. (Score:3, Interesting)
My first reaction was that anti-Microsoft loonies would, by their zealous over-reaction, bile, vitriol, and social incompetence, play right into the hands of Microsoft. Of course, there's a handful of loonies on the pro-Microsoft, or anti-regulation side of the barricades, as well, but for the most part, even though I'm not a part of either of those camps, I suspect that none of their partisans are quite as fanatical about their cause, and so probably appear more reasoned and sensible. However, I'm sure that some loonies on each side posed as loonies on the other, and it all came out in the wash.
Like T.S. Eliot said in The Waste Land, "The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate
intensity".
Re:Just great. (Score:2, Informative)
>intensity".
Just a nitpick, that's actually from W.B. Yeats' The Second Coming, not Eliot 8-).
Interest (Score:2)
Re:Interest (Score:2)
Everybody gets it nowadays... (Score:3, Informative)
A small number of these submissions are simply advertisements or, in at least one case, pornography.
It also said that all submitters of comments will have their names listed in the Federal Register.
Cool! I'll be famous!
I submitted a comment...did you?
Be interesting to verify the 7500 (Score:4, Interesting)
Most likely that those 7500 people are just shareholders of MS.
Re:Be interesting to verify the 7500 (Score:2)
and the 15,000 are Linux users complaining about how they have no choice.
Microsoft not playing fair (Score:2, Interesting)
Somehow i fail to belive that those 7000 letters are from real people and just another fabrication from microsoft.
Re:Microsoft not playing fair (Score:2)
Well, they did actually exist, its just that sometimes they were already dead [newsfactor.com] at the time they sent the letters.
I really hope these new responses are put online in a form that can be easily converted to text (often the courts put these online only as scanned images). It seems that there is enough talent among SlashDot readers to determine if there is any MS astroturf interspersed with the grassroots.
Practically every lobbyist does this to some extent, but the less dishonest ones do it by providing sample text that actual humans voluntarily choose to cut and paste into their letters. Not forging mail from the deceased.
Spam and Porn (Score:4, Insightful)
The first thing I thought when I read this: I bet some bastard sent in the goat sex link. Evil.
Does this mean the government has to publish the porn and the spam in the register along with the legitimate comments?
Stile sent in the goatse.cx link (Score:2)
Doesn't anybody follow the links anymore? (Score:3, Informative)
From the above link, http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f9900/9946.pdf [usdoj.gov] (emphasis mine).
Online and on CD-ROM! (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm glad to see this has a good chance of happening. It would definitely be nice to have easy access to the comments. I'm kind of interested in the 90% that were not "substantive," including the "pornography."
The figures don't exactly add up though. The article states it received 30,000 comments and breaks it down into 15k, and 2 7.5k chunks. However, the first part of the article says only 10% was "substantive."
If the numbers are true, I must say I'm actually quite pleased at the turnout. I'm curious as to whether or not the uh... less constructive comments will have any bearing on the decision. The article seems to paint the picture that most of those opposed the settlement. It does make you wonder if Microsoft's "grassroots" efforts are responsible for those comments.
Any Viruses (Score:2, Funny)
I wonder how many viruses they got?
WUG (Score:4, Funny)
But they either crashed their computers every 12 minutes writing the letters or got blocked by Office XP's WPA after they replaced their broken network card.
Washington Post Article (Score:5, Interesting)
Clean the Augean Stables (Score:2)
WHO WOULD have predicted early in the case of the Department of Justice (DoJ) versus Microsoft that in 2002 both would not only be paddling the same canoe but spinning the same yarn?
But, good golly Miss Molly, and Holy Pixellation! the unthinkable seems to have happened, with the Dow Jones newswire saying that the Great Vole and the DoJ want a one day hearing to settle the affair.
So much so that they've issued a joint filing to the mediator appointed to clean the Augean stables, hmm, i mean, settle the matter.
Proposed Remedy (Score:4, Funny)
Under the terms of the proposed remedy Bill Gates will be required to pose for a photograph, to be published on the World Wide Web at http://goatse.microsoft.com/
A DOJ spokesman said "We really had no clue what these people were asking for when they asked for Microsoft to 'open up their APIs'. But then someone sent us a link to goatse.cx, and all became clear."
Microsofts attorneys were said to be considering the proposal, although an unnamed source pointed out that goatse.sun.com and goatse.oracle.com do not resolve.
"When Steve & Larry open their asses on the web, then Bill might think about it," was the source's opinion.
Re:Proposed Remedy (Score:2)
And I *did* preview it. I'm just a moron.
Polls and Openions (Score:3, Interesting)
I wander how many of those opinions came from people who *really* know what a computer is.
---
Polls and Opinions and the Tunney Act (Score:4, Insightful)
The law in this case requires the collection and publication of opinions. The judge can do with these opinions whatever she wishes, including disregard them completely.
So, don't get your panties in a twist.
This demonstrates strong progress in MS-Awareness (Score:4, Informative)
Only 5 years ago, a great many people would have e-mailed flame after flame to the DOJ against Microsoft; founded not on evidence or logic, but on emotional, personal opinion. But thanks to PR awareness and education in the community, more people can cite specific evidence or examples of Microsoft's illegal behavior, and make rational, well-formed arguments on how Microsoft has damaged innovation, broken published protocols, APIs and standards and how they have illegally leveraged their market position to force out competitors.
Gone, or at least greatly diminished, are the zealots who write "M$ SUCKS!" Instead, people are more educated on the issue and can express their comments with supporting evidence in a calm, rational manner.
Despite these advances and compelling arguments, the US-DOJ still backed down on its position in the antitrust suit; but it can no longer be said that the majority of people who disapprove of Microsoft's business practices are "Anti-MS-Zealots."
E-Mail addresses are included too... (Score:2, Informative)
I won't even think about the poor fools who thought it would be a good idea to include home addresses, phone numbers and other personal information in their signature.
I'm quite sure, though, that the media outlets will pour over these addresses to look for trends like what they did with the screwed up ballots in Florida after the last election....
Personally, I'm just glad that I used an account I barely ever use when I submitted my comment - no need having my work e-mail address published by DOJ!
-Mark
Wow! (Score:5, Funny)
So what happens if someone sent in the source to DeCss inside their email? Would they have had to publish it?
Comment breakdown (Score:2, Funny)
15,000 - mAnti-Microsoft
7,000 - CowboyNeal
hmmmm... (Score:2)
I was just reading about this on The Register, and I hit a link regarding what the 9 remaining states are preposing.
As usually happens, the article discusses what Microsoft will allow.
To that, I say this: Punish Microsoft. If they resist the punishment, revoke their charter, and heavily fine Microsoft Executives.
A simple ultimatum, isn't it? "You have broken the law. Accept the punishment, or die."
Those comments should be interesting reading (Score:2)
One thing for sure, this whole thing is never dull, just when you think you can see the outcome good or bad, it takes a turn in an unexpected direction. Overall I have good feelings about this. Maybe our system sort of works, just slowly...
Will they be posting my name? (Score:2)
Spam filter explained, etc (Score:4, Insightful)
The subject "Hose your grandmother's account" would be filtered out because it does not contain the required subject header.
Of those who said "I hate Microsoft" or "Linux Rulz", these give no constructive comment on either the settlement's comments or what has been excluded. Simply saying "I hate (some company)" may be an ethical statement that you hate them because they sell a product you hate, and is no indication that they are break the law. eg, "I hate Ford", because they sell cars, and I hate cars. This is not a reflection on Ford's business practices.
My comment largely centered on possible antitrust comments in upgrades. For example, there is nothing stopping MS from doing things in "required" upgrades, such as shutting down competitive dual boots [Win2k], applications, &c. Upgrades and retail versions should be subject to the same technical restrictions as OEM versions viz Abiltity to not install assorted middleware, honouring multi-boots, etc.
Different report from AP (Score:3, Informative)
The gov't received over 30,000 emails, 2,900 were "substantive", 45 were "major", 2,800 were form letters.
"Only about 10 percent had anything substantive to say, officials said, calling the volume unprecedented."
Possible response (Score:2, Funny)
"Thank you for taking the time to comment on the proposal. We must regret that even though they have been found to misuse monopoly power, we hold some skepticism that Microsoft is responsible for that on anything other than a very metaphoric level..."
Re:Democracy (Score:2)
Majority loses to the rich or important minority.
Re:SPAMmers (Score:2)
Re:So where did I fall? (Score:2)